Designing Next-Generation Platforms with Machine Learning to Optimize Immune Cell Engineering for Enhanced Applications

Trends in Immunotherapy

Article

Designing Next-Generation Platforms with Machine Learning to Optimize Immune Cell Engineering for Enhanced Applications

Jadhav, S., Chakrapani, I., Sivasubramanian, S., RamKrishna, B. V., Mouleswararao, B., & Gangwar, S. (2025). Designing Next-Generation Platforms with Machine Learning to Optimize Immune Cell Engineering for Enhanced Applications. Trends in Immunotherapy, 9(4), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.54963/ti.v9i4.1402

Authors

  • Sachin Jadhav

    Department of Computer Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra 411048, India
  • I.S. Chakrapani

    Department of Zoology, PRR & VS Govt College, Vidavalur, Andhra Pradesh 52438, India
  • S Sivasubramanian

    Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, New Prince Shri Bhavani College of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600073, India
  • Bh. V. RamKrishna

    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vignana Institute of Technology and Science, Deshmukhi, Hyderabad 508284, India
  • B Mouleswararao

    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh 522502, India
  • Sanjeev Gangwar

    Department of Computer Applications, VBS Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh 222003, India

Received: 14 July 2025; Revised: 24 July 2025; Accepted: 6 August 2025; Published: 8 December 2025

Immune cell engineering is a cutting-edge strategy in modern immunotherapy, enabling precise, personalized treatments using modified immune cells such as CAR-T and NK cells. This paper introduces an Intelligent Optimized Machine Learning (IoML) framework with Sorting Slap Swarm Optimization (SSSO) to enhance immune cell design. The IoML model employs a ranking-based Deep Neural Network (DNN) to predict therapeutic metrics—cytotoxicity, persistence, safety, and antigen specificity—from high-dimensional biological data. Public datasets including GSE120575, ImmPort, and the Single Cell Portal were used for training and validation. The SSSO algorithm efficiently explores the immune cell design space, selecting optimal configurations based on predicted performance. Simulation results highlight the IoML model as an intelligent, low-overhead solution for personalized immunotherapy. It achieved a classification accuracy of 96.8%, precision of 96.1%, recall of 95.9%, and F1-score of 96.0%, outperforming Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, and Differential Evolution methods. In ranking analysis, the model attained a score of 0.92 within 30 iterations. Experimental validation confirmed optimized CAR-T cells with cytotoxicity of 96.2%, persistence of 93.8%, and apoptosis resistance of 94.3%, while reducing off-target effects to 3.2%. These findings demonstrate that the IoML–SSSO framework surpasses conventional approaches in accuracy, convergence speed, and biological relevance, effectively identifying top-performing immune cell configurations for next-generation immunotherapy platforms.

Keywords:

Immune Cell Machine Learning Optimization Deep Neural Network (DNN) Immunotherapy

References

  1. Son, A.; Park, J.; Kim, W.; et al. Integrating Computational Design and Experimental Approaches for Next-Generation Biologics. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1073.
  2. Mason, D.M.; Reddy, S.T. Predicting Adaptive Immune Receptor Specificities by Machine Learning is a Data Generation Problem. Cell Syst. 2024, 15, 1190–1197.
  3. Capponi, S.; Daniels, K.G. Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Advance Cell Therapy. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 320, 147–165.
  4. Irvine, E.B.; Reddy, S.T. Advancing Antibody Engineering through Synthetic Evolution and Machine Learning. J. Immunol. 2024, 212, 235–243.
  5. Parthiban, S.; Vijeesh, T.; Gayathri, T.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Systems Engineering for Next-Generation Plant-Derived Biopharmaceuticals. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1252166.
  6. Notin, P.; Rollins, N.; Gal, Y.; et al. Machine Learning for Functional Protein Design. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 216–228.
  7. Nosrati, H.; Nosrati, M. Artificial Intelligence in Regenerative Medicine: Applications and Implications. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 442.
  8. Gallo, E. The Rise of Big Data: Deep Sequencing-Driven Computational Methods Are Transforming the Landscape of Synthetic Antibody Design. J. Biomed. Sci. 2024, 31, 29.
  9. Bravi, B. Development and Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in Vaccine Target Selection. npj Vaccines 2024, 9, 15.
  10. Zhou, H.; Xu, L.; Ren, Z.; et al. Machine Learning-Augmented Surface-Enhanced Spectroscopy Toward Next-Generation Molecular Diagnostics. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 538–570.
  11. Rao, L.; Yuan, Y.; Shen, X.; et al. Designing Nanotheranostics with Machine Learning. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2024, 19, 1769–1781.
  12. Arras, P.; Yoo, H.B.; Pekar, L.; et al. AI/ML Combined with Next-Generation Sequencing of VHH Immune Repertoires Enables the Rapid Identification of de Novo Humanized and Sequence-Optimized Single Domain Antibodies: A Prospective Case Study. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1249247. .
  13. Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Fang, D.; et al. Informing Immunotherapy with Multi-Omics Driven Machine Learning. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 67.
  14. Zhang, W.Y.; Zheng, X.L.; Coghi, P.S.; et al. Revolutionizing Adjuvant Development: Harnessing AI for Next-Generation Cancer Vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1438030.
  15. Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Deciphering the Tumor Immune Microenvironment from a Multidimensional Omics Perspective: Insight into Next-Generation CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy and Beyond. Mol. Cancer 2024, 23, 131.
  16. Bai, G.; Sun, C.; Guo, Z.; et al. Accelerating Antibody Discovery and Design With Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances and Prospects. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2023, 95, 13–24.
  17. Teng, F.; Cui, T.; Zhou, L.; et al. Programmable Synthetic Receptors: The Next-Generation of Cell and Gene Therapies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 7.
  18. Singh, R.; Chandley, P.; Rohatgi, S. Recent Advances in the Development of Monoclonal Antibodies and Next-Generation Antibodies. Immunohorizons 2023, 7, 886–897.
  19. Akhtar, Z.B. Exploring Biomedical Engineering (BME): Advances Within Accelerated Computing and Regenerative Medicine for a Computational and Medical Science Perspective Exploration Analysis. J. Emerg. Med. OA 2024, 2, 1–23.
  20. Zeng, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; et al. Plasma Cytokine and Chemokine Profiles Predict Efficacy and Toxicity of Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025, 25, e474–e486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.009
  21. Xu, J.; Zhao, C.; Wei, Z.; et al. Screening Analysis of Predictive Markers for Cytokine Release Syndrome Risk in CAR-T Cell Therapy. Curr. Bioinform. 2025, 20, 428–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748936295986240619162816
  22. Su, M.; Chen, L.; Xie, L.; et al. Identification of Early Predictive Biomarkers for Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome in Pediatric Patients with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1450173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1450173
  23. Sidhom, J.W.; Larman, H.B.; Pardoll, D.M.; et al. DeepTCR Is a Deep Learning Framework for Revealing Sequence Concepts Within T-Cell Repertoires. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21879-w
  24. Tedesco, V.E.V.; Mohan, C. Biomarkers for Predicting Cytokine Release Syndrome Following CD19-Targeted CAR T Cell Therapy. J. Immunol. 2021, 206, 1561–1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2001249
  25. Rajeeve, S.; Wilkes, M.; Zahradka, N.; et al. Early Detection of Cytokine Release Syndrome Using Wearable Devices and Cytokine Profiling Following CAR-T Therapy for Myeloma: Results from an Investigator-Initiated Trial. submitted.
  26. Hao, Y.; Hao, S.; Andersen-Nissen, E.; et al. Integrated Analysis of Multimodal Single-Cell Data. Cell 2021, 184, 3573–3587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048
  27. Lotfollahi, M.; Wolf, F.A.; Theis, F.J.; et al. scGen Predicts Single-Cell Perturbation Responses. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 715–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0494-8
  28. Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Ni, F.; et al. CAR-T Cell Therapy-Related Cytokine Release Syndrome and Therapeutic Response Is Modulated by the Gut Microbiome in Hematologic Malignancies. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32960-3
  29. Daoudlarian, D.; Segot, A.; Latifyan, S.; et al. Tocilizumab and Immune Signatures for Targeted Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome in Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Ann. Oncol. 2025, 36, 444–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.12.004
  30. Conde, C.D.; Xu, C.; Jarvis, L.B.; et al. Cross-Tissue Immune Cell Analysis Reveals Tissue-Specific Features in Humans. Science 2022, 376, eabl5197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl5197
  31. Modoni, A.; Vollono, C.; Galli, E.; et al. Predictors of Neurotoxicity in a Large Cohort of Italian Patients Undergoing Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy. Brain Behav. 2025, 15, e70891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70891