Efficacy of a Novel Nanoparticle RSV Vaccine in Preventing Infection in Older Adults: Phase III Clinical Trial

Trends in Immunotherapy

Article

Efficacy of a Novel Nanoparticle RSV Vaccine in Preventing Infection in Older Adults: Phase III Clinical Trial

Tashbolotovich, T. K., Qasim, S. A., Jasim, I. K., Al-Ani, O. A. S., Kareem, F. A., & Abdirasulovna, A. Z. (2025). Efficacy of a Novel Nanoparticle RSV Vaccine in Preventing Infection in Older Adults: Phase III Clinical Trial. Trends in Immunotherapy, 9(4), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.54963/ti.v9i4.1004

Authors

  • Turdubaev Kursanbek Tashbolotovich

    Department of Pediatrics 1, Medical Faculty, Osh State University, Osh 723500, Kyrgyzstan
  • Suha Adel Qasim

    Department of Medical Laboratory Analysis, Al Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq
  • Ihsan Khudhair Jasim

    Department of Medical Laboratory Analysis, Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq
  • Omar Abdulwahid Salih Al-Ani

    Department of Medical Laboratory Analysis, Al-Rafidain University College Baghdad 10064, Iraq
  • Faris Abdul Kareem

    Department of Medical Laboratory Analysis, Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq
  • Abdirasulova Zhainagul Abdirasulovna

    Department of Clinical Disciplines 2, International Medical Faculty, Osh State University, Osh 723500, Kyrgyzstan

Received: 10 February 2025; Revised: 30 June 2025; Accepted: 16 July 2025; Published: 29 October 2025

In this susceptible population, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause severe lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI), which can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Adults who have RSV infection face a substantial burden. In this study, a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a liposome-encapsulated perfusion F protein nanoparticle-based RSV vaccine (Nano-RSV) in preventing RSV infection. Adults who were enrolled and 60 years of age or older were given either Nano-RSV or a placebo. The incidence of laboratory-confirmed RSV LRTI exhibiting three or more symptoms (cough, fever, and shortness of breath) was the main outcome. Severity of symptoms and hospitalization rates for RSV LRTI were secondary endpoints. When compared to a placebo, the Nano-RSV vaccine dramatically lowered the risk of RSV LRTI (vaccine efficacy: 82.6%, 95% CI: 74.1–90.2%). RSV LRTI-related hospitalization rates were likewise markedly lower in the immunization group. The safety profile of the Nano-RSV vaccine was comparable to that of a placebo, and it was well-tolerated. These results imply that Nano-RSV may prove to be a secure and reliable prophylactic against RSV infection and its sequelae in the elderly.

Keywords:

RSV Vaccine Liposome-Encapsulated Perfusion F Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine Phase III Clinical Trial LRTI RSV Infection

References

  1. Mascola, J.R.; Fauci, A.S. Novel Vaccine Technologies for the 21st Century. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 87–88.
  2. Røttingen, J.A.; Gouglas, D.; Feinberg, M.; et al. New Vaccines Against Epidemic Infectious Diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 610–613.
  3. Li, J.F.; Garnsey, E. Policy-Driven Ecosystems for New Vaccine Development. Technovation 2014, 34, 762–772.
  4. Kanekiyo, M.; Ellis, D.; King, N.P. New Vaccine Design and Delivery Technologies. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 219, S88–S96.
  5. Rossey, I.; Saelens, X. Vaccines Against Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Clinical Trials, Where Are We Now? Expert Rev. Vaccines 2019, 18, 1053–1067.
  6. Walsh, E.E.; Falsey, A.R.; Scott, D.A.; et al. A Randomized Phase 1/2 Study of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 225, 1357–1366.
  7. Green, C.A.; Scarselli, E.; Voysey, M.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Novel Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccines Based on the RSV Viral Proteins F, N and M2-1 Encoded by Simian Adenovirus (PanAd3-RSV) and MVA (MVA-RSV); Protocol for an Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Single-Centre, Phase 1 Clinical Trial in Healthy Adults. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008748.
  8. Schwarz, T.F.; McPhee, R.A.; Launay, O.; et al. Immunogenicity and Safety of 3 Formulations of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Candidate Vaccine in Nonpregnant Women: A Phase 2, Randomized Trial. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 220, 1816–1825.
  9. Abarca, K.; Rey-Jurado, E.; Muñoz-Durango, N.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity Evaluation of Recombinant BCG Vaccine Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I Clinical Trial. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 27, 100517.
  10. Ascough, S.; Vlachantoni, I.; Kalyan, M.; et al. Local and Systemic Immunity Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Induced by a Novel Intranasal Vaccine. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 200, 481–492.
  11. Mejias, A.; Rodríguez-Fernández, R.; Oliva, S.; et al. The Journey to a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020, 125, 36–46.
  12. Tameris, M.D.; Hatherill, M.; Landry, B.S.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of MVA85A, a New Tuberculosis Vaccine, in Infants Previously Vaccinated with BCG: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b Trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 1021–1028.
  13. Kharfan-Dabaja, M.A.; Boeckh, M.; Wilck, M.B.; et al. A Novel Therapeutic Cytomegalovirus DNA Vaccine in Allogeneic Haemopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 290–299.
  14. Silfverdal, S.A.; Icardi, G.; Vesikari, T.; et al. A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at 2, 4, and 11–12 Months. Vaccine 2016, 34, 3810–3816.
  15. Vesikari, T.; Becker, T.; Vertruyen, A.F.; et al. A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at Two, Three, Four and Twelve Months. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2017, 36, 209–215.
  16. Baden, L.R.; Karita, E.; Mutua, G.; et al. Assessment of the Safety and Immunogenicity of 2 Novel Vaccine Platforms for HIV-1 Prevention: A Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016, 164, 313–322.
  17. Moss, R.B.; Hansen, C.; Sanders, R.L.; et al. A Phase II Study of DAS181, a Novel Host Directed Antiviral for the Treatment of Influenza Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 1844–1851.
  18. Nell, A.S.; D’lom, E.; Bouic, P.; et al. Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Novel Antituberculous Vaccine RUTI: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial in Patients with Latent Tuberculosis Infection. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89612.
  19. Kono, K.; Iinuma, H.; Akutsu, Y.; et al. Multicenter, Phase II Clinical Trial of Cancer Vaccination for Advanced Esophageal Cancer with Three Peptides Derived from Novel Cancer-Testis Antigens. J. Transl. Med. 2012, 10, 1–9.
  20. Capeding, M.R.; Tran, N.H.; Hadinegoro, S.R.S.; et al. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Healthy Children in Asia: A Phase 3, Randomised, Observer-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet 2014, 384, 1358–1365.
  21. Vink, P.; Torrell, J.M.R.; Fructuoso, A.S.; et al. Immunogenicity and Safety of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Chronically Immunosuppressed Adults Following Renal Transplant: A Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 181–190.

Copyright © UK Scientific Publishing Limited.