Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters

Article

The Convincing Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis of the Strongest Geomagnetic Anomalies of the Magnetic Field of the Earth

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/ptnd.v3i1.221
V. Simonenko, S. (2024). The Convincing Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis of the Strongest Geomagnetic Anomalies of the Magnetic Field of the Earth . Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.54963/ptnd.v3i1.221
Volume 3 Issue 1: June 2024
Copyright (c) 2024 Sergey Simonenko
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters (PTND)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters (PTND) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Sergey V. Simonenko
    V.I. Il’ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690041, Russia

The author presents convincing evidence of the cosmic (planetary and solar) energy gravitational origin (related to the maximal and minimal combined planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influences on the internal rigid core of the Earth) of the maximal temporal intensifications of the global magnetic processes of the Earth. In fairly good agreement with the calculated date 2007.416666666 AD (of the local minimal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core), it was observed the very rapid changes of the geomagnetic field near the date March 2007 AD (corresponding approximately to 19-20 April 2007 AD). This fairly good agreement gives the additional convincing argument that the date March 2007 AD can be considered as the possible beginning of the geomagnetic reversal during the evaluated range (2007÷2216) AD. The strong magnetic anomaly occurred on 6 January 2020 AD in perfect agreement with the calculated date 2020.016666667 AD (corresponding to 6 January 2020 AD) related to the local maximal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core. In fairly good agreement with the calculated date 2023.26666666 AD (corresponding approximately to 7 April 2023 AD) of the local maximal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core, it was observed the strongest (during the last 6 years) magnetic anomaly on 23 March 2023 AD. These convincing agreements demonstrate the physical validity of the established global prediction thermohydrogravidynamic principles, which can be considered as the proven physical basis for the development of the general unified geophysical theory (describing the possible geomagnetic reversal during the evaluated  range (2007 ÷ 2216) AD) combining the Special Theory of Relativity, the relativistic electrodynamics and the relativistic theory of the non-stationary gravitation, which can be developed based on the established physical analogy between the established relation  for the energy flux (of the gravitational energy) and the Lorentz’s calibration condition (for the vector potential related with the scalar potential of the non-stationary electromagnetic field).

Keywords:

non-stationary gravitation of the solar system generalized formulation of the first laws of thermodynamics global seismotectonic and magnetic processes the problem of the geomagnetic reversal thermohydrogravidynamic theory and technology global prediction thermohydrogravidynamic principles

References

  1. Mandea, M.; Panet, I.; Lesur, V.; De Viron, O.; Diament, M.; Le Mouël, J.L. Recent changes of the Earth’s core derived from satellite observations of magnetic and gravity fields. PNAS USA. 2012, 109, 19129–19133. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207346109
  2. Simonenko, S.V. The evidence of the cosmic energy gravitational genesis of the possible forthcoming geomagnetic reversal of the magnetic field of the Earth. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Innov. Technol. 2014, 3, 568–585.
  3. Simonenko, S.V. The cosmic energy gravitational genesis of the forthcoming intensifications of the global seismotectonic, volcanic, climatic and magnetic activities since 2016 AD. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 2, 211–229.
  4. Unexpected Electrical Surge and Magnetic Anomaly Reported in Norway. Available online: https://strangesounds.org/2020/01/mysterious-electrical-surge-magnetic-anomaly-ground-norway.html (accessed on 7 January 2020).
  5. G3 (strong) geomagnetic storming observed 23 March, 2023. Available online: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/g3-strong-geomagnetic-storming-observed-23-march-2023
  6. Simonenko, S.V. The evidence of the cosmic energy gravitational origin of the forthcoming intensification of the global seismotectonic, volcanic, climatic and magnetic activity of the Earth, and the problem of the controlled thermonuclear reactions. Int. J. Latest Res. Sci. Tech. 2014, 3, 206–214.
  7. Bucha, V. Archaeomagnetic and palaeomagnetic study of the magnetic field of the Earth in the past 600000 years. Nature. 1967, 213, 1005–1007. https://doi.org/10.1038/2131005a0
  8. Crain, I.K.; Crain, P.L.; Plaut, M.G. Long period Fourier spectrum of geomagnetic reversals. Nature. 1969, 223, 283. https://doi.org/10.1038/223283a0
  9. Richter, C.F. Elementary Seismology; W.H. Freeman: San Francisco, USA, 1958; pp. 768.
  10. Sgrigna, V.; Conti, L. A deterministic approach to earthquake prediction. Int. J. of Geophys. 2012, 406278. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/406278
  11. Simonenko, S.V. Fundamentals of the thermohydrogravidynamic theory of the global seismotectonic activity of the Earth. Int. J. of Geophys. 2013, 519829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/519829
  12. Tinivella U.; Giustiniani M.; Cassiani G. Geophysical methods for environmental studies. Int. J. of Geophys. 2013, 950353. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/950353
  13. Simonenko, S.V. The prognosticating aspects of the developed cosmic geophysics concerning the subsequent forthcoming intensifications of the global seismicity, volcanic and climatic activity of the Earth in the 21st century. Brit. J. of Appl. Sci. & Techn. 2014, 4, 3563–3630. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2014/10766
  14. Simonenko, S.V. The Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis of the Increase of the Seismic and Volcanic Activity of the Earth in the Beginning of the 21st Century AD; Institute of Technology and Business Press: Nakhodka, Russia, 2012; pp. 220.
  15. Simonenko, S.V. Statistical thermohydrodynamics of irreversible strike-slip-rotational processes. In Rotational Processes in Geology and Physics; KomKniga: Moscow, Russia, 2007; pp. 225–251. (in Russian)
  16. Simonenko, S.V. Thermohydrogravidynamics of the Solar System; Institute of Technology and Business Press: Nakhodka, Russia, 2007; pp. 182.
  17. Simonenko, S.V. Non-equilibrium Statistical Thermohydrodynamics of Turbulence; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2006; pp. 174.
  18. De Groot, S.R.; Mazur, P. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Holland, 1962; pp. 441.
  19. Gyarmati, I. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics. Field Theory and Variational Principles; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1970; pp. 184.
  20. Simonenko, S.V. The confirmed validity of the thermohydrogravidynamic theory concerning the strongest intensifications of the global natural processes of the Earth in 2016 since 1 September, 2016. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Tech. 2016, 18, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2016/30049
  21. Gibbs, J.W. Graphical methods in the thermodynamics of fluids. Trans. of the Connect. Acad. 1873, 2, 309–342.
  22. Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. Theoretical Physics. Vol. 5. Statistical Physics, 3rd ed.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1976; pp. 584. (in Russian)
  23. Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2. Field Theory, 7th ed.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1988; pp. 512. (in Russian)
  24. Simonenko, S.V. The confirmed cosmic energy gravitational genesis of the strongest Japanese, Italian, Greek, Chinese and Chilean earthquakes. Energy Res. 2018, 2, 1–32.
  25. Simonenko, S.V. The thermohydrogravidynamic theory concerning the first forthcoming subrange 2020 ÷ 2026 AD of the increased intensification of the Earth. New Horiz. Math. Phys. 2019, 3, 13–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.22606/nhmp.2019.32001
  26. Simonenko, S.V. The confirmed validity of the thermohydrogravidynamic theory concerning the forthcoming intensification of the global natural processes from December 7, 2019 to April 18, 2020 AD. J. Geosci. Env. Prot. 2020, 8, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.810022
  27. Simonenko, S.V. Fundamentals of the Thermohydrogravidynamic Theory of Cosmic Genesis of the Planetary Cataclysms, 1st ed.; Institute of Technology and Business Press: Nakhodka, Russia, 2009; pp. 273.
  28. Simonenko, S.V. Fundamentals of the Thermohydrogravidynamic Theory of Cosmic Genesis of the Planetary Cataclysms, 2nd ed.; Institute of Technology and Business Press: Nakhodka, Russia, 2010; pp. 281.
  29. Abbott, B.P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 061102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
  30. Simonenko, S.V. An update of the global prediction of thermohydrogravidynamic principle concerning the strongest intensifications of the seismotectonic processes: Special reference to California. Amb. Sci. 2019, 6, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.21276/ambi.2019.06.1.aa02
  31. Simonenko, S.V. The confirmed validity of the explanatory aspect of the thermohydrogravidynamic theory concerning the evaluated maximal magnitude of the strongest earthquake of the Earth near the predicted date 2021.1 AD during the range from October 27, 2020 to May 17, 2021 AD. J. Geosci. Env. Prot. 2022, 10, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.107019
  32. Mörner, N.A.; Lanser, J.P.; Hospers, J. Late Weichselian palaeomagnetic reversal. Nat. Phys. Sci. 1971, 234, 173–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/physci234173a0
  33. Barbetti, M.; McElhinny, M. Evidence of a geomagnetic excursion 30000 yr BP. Nature. 1972, 239, 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/239327a0
  34. LØvlie, R. Palaeomagnetic excursions during the last interglacial/glacial cycle: A synthesis. Quat. Int. 1989, 3–4, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-6182(89)90068-2
  35. Hawking, S.; Mlodinow, L. A Briefer History of Time; AST: Moscow, Russia, 2019; pp. 176. (in Russian)
  36. McVittie, G.C. General Relativity and Cosmology; Chapman and Hall Ltd: London, UK, 1956.
  37. Simonenko, S.V. The macroscopic non-equilibrium kinetic energies of a small fluid particle. J. Non-Equil. Thermod. 2004, 29(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/JNETDY.2004.007