Journal of Qualitative Research in Education - Eğitimde nitel araştırmalar dergisi

Articles

Comparison of the Content Structures of Environmental Topics in Science Textbooks in Türkiye and Iran

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i46.2313
Inaltekin, T., Akcay, H., & Karaçöp, A. (2026). Comparison of the Content Structures of Environmental Topics in Science Textbooks in Türkiye and Iran. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (46), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i46.2313
Issue 46 (2026): in progress
Copyright (c) 2026 Tufan Inaltekin, Hakan Akcay, Ataman Karaçöp
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Journal of Qualitative Research in Education (ENAD)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by ENAD agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source are properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, and transform the content.

Authors

  • Tufan Inaltekin

    Dede Korkut Faculty of Education, Kafkas University, Kars 36100, Türkiye
  • Hakan Akcay

    The Faculty of Education, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul 34342, Türkiye
  • Ataman Karaçöp

    Dede Korkut Faculty of Education, Kafkas University, Kars 36100, Türkiye

Received: 14 August 2025; Revised: 15 December 2025; Accepted: 8 April 2026; Published: 21 April 2026

The aim of this study was to compare the content structures related to environmental topics in primary and middle school science textbooks in Türkiye and Iran. A total of six textbooks from Türkiye and nine from Iran were analyzed as data sources. Conducted using document analysis, a qualitative research method the study revealed significant differences in how environmental topics are addressed in the textbooks of the two countries. It was found that the richness of content regarding environmental issues varies significantly between primary and middle school levels in both Turkish and Iranian textbooks. It was determined that science textbooks for primary and middle school in Türkiye offer much richer content compared to their Iranian counterparts in terms of data usage, content depth, scientific and technological perspectives, and the development of environmental awareness. Differences emerged between the two countries’ curriculum approaches regarding the effectiveness of environmental education. It was observed that science textbooks in Türkiye support a sustainability-based approach to environmental education to a greater extent than those in Iran. Although textbooks in both countries address many environmental topics, shortcomings were identified. A common shortcoming in both countries is the insufficient integration of the cultural context into environmental education. In this context, it is clear that environmental issues in the textbooks of both countries need to be addressed more comprehensively and evaluated from a global perspective. Furthermore, taking educational levels into account, the content should be structured in a more balanced and inclusive manner that reflects current conditions.

Keywords:

Türkiye Iran Environmental Topics Science Textbooks Primary-Middle School

References

  1. Hariram, N.P.; Mekha, K.B.; Suganthan, V.; et al. Sustainalism: An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model to Address Sustainable Development and Sustainability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10682.
  2. Ahmad, F.; Saeed, Q.; Shah, S.M.U.; et al. Environmental Sustainability: Challenges and Approaches. In Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability; Jhariya, M.K., Meena, R.S., Banerjee, A., et al., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 243–270.
  3. Awewomom, J.; Dzeble, F.; Takyi, Y.D.; et al. Addressing Global Environmental Pollution Using Environmental Control Techniques: A Focus on Environmental Policy and Preventive Environmental Management. Discov. Environ. 2024, 2, 1–20.
  4. Kolawole, A.S.; Iyiola, A.O. Environmental Pollution: Threats, Impact on Biodiversity, and Protection Strategies. In Sustainable Utilization and Conservation of Africa’s Biological Resources and Environment; Izah, S.C., Ogwu, M.C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 377–409.
  5. Ogidi, O.I.; Akpan, U.M. Aquatic Biodiversity Loss: Impacts of Pollution and Anthropogenic Activities and Strategies for Conservation. In Biodiversity in Africa: Potentials, Threats and Conservation; Izah, S.C., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 421–448.
  6. Farrukh, M.; Ansari, N.; Raza, A.; et al. Fostering Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behavior through Green Transformational Leadership, Green Human Resource Management and Environmental Knowledge. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2022, 179, 121643.
  7. Gomes, S.; Lopes, J.M.; Nogueira, S. Willingness to Pay More for Green Products: A Critical Challenge for Gen Z. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 390, 136092.
  8. Lee, A. The Importance of Cultivating Awareness of Environmental Matters in Science Classrooms: A Cross-Regional Study. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 2023, 39, 467–491.
  9. Biström, E.; Lundström, R. Textbooks and Action Competence for Sustainable Development: An Analysis of Swedish Lower Middle Level Textbooks in Geography and Biology. Environ. Educ. Res. 2020, 27, 279–294.
  10. Darayseh, A.; AlHawamdeh, B. Science Textbooks as an Education Resources for Sustainability: A Content Analysis. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Tech. Ed. 2024, 20, em2383.
  11. Boujemaa, A.; Silvia, C.; Adriana, V.; et al. Knowledge and Values in Science Textbooks Concerning Complexity in Ecological Systems and Environmental Problems: A Cross-Cultural Study on Middle School Manuals. US-China Educ. Rev. 2009, 6, 25–37.
  12. Choi, S.; Niyogi, D.; Shepardson, D.P.; et al. Do Earth and Environmental Science Textbooks Promote Middle and High School Students’ Conceptual Development about Climate Change? Textbooks’ Consideration of Students’ Misconceptions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2010, 91, 889–898.
  13. Sharma, A.; Buxton, C.A. Human-Nature Relationships in School Science: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Middle-Grade Science Textbook. Sci. Educ. 2015, 99, 260–281.
  14. Lebanese American University. Available online: https://laur.lau.edu.lb:8443/xmlui/handle/10725/13779 (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  15. Gola, B. Is Formal Environmental Education Friendly to Nature? Environmental Ethics in Science Textbooks for Primary School Pupils in Poland. Ethics Educ. 2017, 12, 320–336.
  16. Vojíř, K.; Svobodová, S. Environmental Literacy Curriculum: An Analysis of Science Textbooks for Lower Middle Education. J. Biol. Educ. 2024, 59, 799–817.
  17. Morris, H. Socioscientific Issues and Multidisciplinarity in School Science Textbooks. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2014, 36, 1137–1158.
  18. Fonseca, R.P. The Impacts of Animal Farming: A Critical Review of Middle and High School Textbooks. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 2023, 18, 829–852.
  19. Özdemir, F. Opinions of Social Studies Teachers on Environmental Education Through Social Studies Curriculum and Textbooks. Particip. Educ. Res. 2022, 9, 486–501.
  20. Lacin Simsek, C. Investigation of Environmental Topics in the Science and Technology Curriculum and Textbooks in Terms of Environmental Ethics and Aesthetics. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 2011, 11, 2252–2257.
  21. Karimzadegan, H.; Meiboudia, H. Exploration of Environmental Literacy in Science Education Curriculum in Primary Schools in Iran. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 46, 404–409.
  22. Zamani, B.E.; Azimi, S.A.; Soleimani, N. Content Analysis of Primary Science Books by Using Soft Educational Technology to Teach Environmental Issues in Iran and Russia. J. Environ. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 8, 15–36.
  23. Salmani, B.; Hakimzadeh, R.; Asgari, M.; et al. Environmental Education in Iranian School Curriculum, Acontent Analyses of Social Studies and Science Textbooks. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2015, 9, 151–156.
  24. Najjari, R.; Darvish, M. Analysis of the Content of Iran’s Fourth-Grade Textbooks Based on the Level of Attention to Green Management Components. J. Environ. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 10, 147–155.
  25. Gülersoy, A.E.; Aydemir, N. Analysis of 4th Grade Science Textbooks in Terms of Sustainable Environmental Education. Ankara Univ. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 11, 23–42.
  26. Demirezen, S.; Kaya, E. Environmental Issues in Social Sciences and Sciences Curriculum and Textbooks. J. Educ. New Approaches 2022, 5, 240–265.
  27. Koyuncu, S.; Köksal, E.A. Environmental Problems and Solutions in the 5th Grade Science Textbook. Educ. Sci. 2023, 18, 1–12.
  28. Erten, S.; Köseoğlu, P. Zero Waste Project in Middle School Science Course Books. Milli Egitim J. 2022, 51, 1085–1110.
  29. Erbaş, A.A. Global Warming and Climate Change in Primary School Curriculums and Textbooks. Abant Izzet Baysal Univ. J. Fac. Educ. 2023, 23, 728–746.
  30. Derman, M.; Gurbuz, H. Environmental education in the science curriculum in different countries: Turkey, Australia, Singapore, Ireland, and Canada. J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Health 2018, 4, 129–141.
  31. Zidny, R.; Sjöström, J.; Eilks, I. A Multi-Perspective Reflection on How Indigenous Knowledge and Related Ideas Can Improve Science Education for Sustainability. Sci. Educ. 2020, 29, 145–185.
  32. Örnek, F.; Alaam, S. Five Essential Features of Scientific Inquiry in Bahraini Primary School Science Textbooks and Workbooks. Sci. Educ. 2025, 34, 1551–1599.
  33. Bowen, G.A. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qual. Res. J. 2009, 9, 27–40.
  34. Morgan, H. Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. Qual. Rep. 2022, 27, 64–77.
  35. Halawa, S.; Hsu, Y.-S.; Zhang, W.-X. Inquiry Activity Design from Singaporean and Indonesian Physics Textbooks. Sci. Educ. 2024, 33, 581–607.
  36. Ma, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; et al. A Comparative Study on Scientific Inquiry Activities of Chinese Science Textbooks in High Schools. Res. Sci. Educ. 2021, 51, 407–427.
  37. Wan, D.; Lee, Y.-J. Coherence of Topics from Middle-School Integrated Science Textbooks from Taiwan and Korea. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2022, 20, 881–899.
  38. Sandelowski, M.; Voils, C.I.; Knafl, G. On Quantitizing. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2009, 3, 208–222.
  39. Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–400.
  40. Miles, M.B.; Huberman, M.A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994.
  41. Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed.; Sage Publications Ltd: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014.
  42. Yilmaz Na, E. A Critical Analysis of Turkish Environmental Education and Climate Change Curriculum through Posner Curriculum Analysis Model. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. Res. 2026, 15, 1–21.
  43. Karahasan, B. C.; Pinar, M. Climate Change and Spatial Agricultural Development in Turkey. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2023, 27, 1699–1720.
  44. Bulut, U.; Atay-Polat, M.; Bulut, A.S. Environmental Deterioration, Renewable Energy, Natural Resource Rents, and Schooling in Türkiye: Does the Degree of Energy Transition Matter for Environmental Quality? J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 365, 121639.
  45. Yücel, D.; Önal Çalışkan, İ. A Comparative Investigation of Environmental Literacy Dimensions in Science Curricula of Several Countries. Particip. Educ. Res. 2025, 12, 210-228.
  46. Mousavi, N.; Ahmadi, S.; Sharifian Sani, M.; et al. Identifying Environmental Education Strategies for Children with an Emphasis on Children under Four Years Old: A Qualitative Study in Iran. Heliyon, 2024, 10, e37161.
  47. Gürhan, E. Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Perspectives on Environmental Education, Cultural Heritage, and Values Education: An Action Research Study. Tarbiyah J. Ilmiah Kependidikan 2025, 14, 41–50.
  48. Oe, H.; Yamaoka, Y.; Ochiai, H. A Qualitative Assessment of Community Learning Initiatives for Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Change: Applying UNESCO Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Framework. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3528.
  49. Ghanbari, S.; Jafari, M.; Eastin, I.; et al. Education of climate changes and evaluation among high school students in Iran. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 2023, 22, 43–60.