Reimagining Mathematics Education through Context and Culture: Emerging Opportunities and Pedagogical Challenges

Journal of Qualitative Research in Education - Eğitimde nitel araştırmalar dergisi

Articles

Reimagining Mathematics Education through Context and Culture: Emerging Opportunities and Pedagogical Challenges

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i46.2307
Legarde, M. A. (2026). Reimagining Mathematics Education through Context and Culture: Emerging Opportunities and Pedagogical Challenges. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (46), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i46.2307
Issue 46 (2026): in progress
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Angelo Legarde
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Journal of Qualitative Research in Education (ENAD)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by ENAD agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source are properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, and transform the content.

Authors

  • Michael Angelo Legarde

    Mathematics Education and Educational Management, Graduate School, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa City 5300, Philippines

Received: 21 January 2026; Revised: 10 February 2026; Accepted: 28 February 2026; Published: 25 March 2026

Palawan, Philippines, is characterized by deep cultural heterogeneity and multilingual classrooms, making it a critical context for examining culturally responsive and localized approaches to mathematics education. Anchored on the principles of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Ethnomathematics, and Social Constructivism, this study investigated the opportunities and challenges of contextualizing and localizing mathematics instruction and examined its implications for teaching practices, student learning, and curriculum development in this culturally complex frontier region. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, quantitative data were first collected through structured surveys from 100 secondary mathematics teachers and 300 students to identify general trends in perceptions of localized instruction. These findings then guided the qualitative phase, which involved semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to explain and deepen understanding of the quantitative results. Findings revealed that contextualized and localized mathematics instruction significantly enhanced student engagement, motivation, conceptual understanding, collaboration, and cultural identity, as lessons grounded in community experiences and familiar practices made abstract concepts more meaningful and accessible. However, several systemic challenges were also identified, including limited availability of high-quality localized instructional materials, increased teacher preparation demands, linguistic diversity within single classrooms, misalignment with standardized curriculum and assessment systems, and inconsistent institutional support. This study contributes new empirical evidence on the tension between linguistic plurality and standardized educational structures within Indigenous–migrant learning environments, a dimension that remains underexamined in Southeast Asian mathematics education research. Sustainable implementation requires targeted teacher training for multi-ethnic classrooms, alignment of localized instruction with curriculum and assessment systems, adequate instructional resources, and stronger institutional and community support.

Keywords:

Context-Based Learning Contextualized Assessment Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Inclusive Education Localization Pedagogical Implications

References

  1. Madrazo, A.L.; Dio, R.V. Contextualized Learning Modules in Bridging Students’ Learning Gaps in Calculus with Analytic Geometry through Independent Learning. J. Math. Educ. 2020, 11, 457–476.
  2. Bature, I.J. The Mathematics Teachers Shift from the Traditional Teacher-Centered Classroom to a More Constructivist Student-Centered Epistemology. Open Access Libr. J. 2020, 7, e6389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106389
  3. Acharya, B.R. Promoting Inclusive Mathematics Classroom Practices in the Schools of Nepal: An Ethnographic Inquiry. Int. J. Res.-Granthaalayah 2020, 8, 223–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i3.2020.146
  4. Legarde, M.A. Working with Mathematical Problems: An Analysis of Students Misconceptions and its Impact on Mathematics Learning. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2022, 10, 25–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/14358
  5. Sinaga, B.; Sitorus, J.; Situmeang, T. The Influence of Students’ Problem-Solving Understanding and Results of Students’ Mathematics Learning. Front. Educ. 2023, 8, 1088556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1088556
  6. Pelenio, R.E.; Bacabac, M.A.A. The Impact of Indigenized Practical Tasks to Higaonon Students’ Learning Behavior and Mathematics Performance: A Case Study. Am. J. Educ. Res. 2024, 12, 141–146.
  7. Fouze, A.Q.; Amit, M. The Importance of Ethnomathematics Education. Creat. Educ. 2023, 14, 729–740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.144048
  8. Reyes, J.; Insorio, A.O.; Ingreso, M.L.V.; et al. Conception and Application of Contextualization in Mathematics Education. Int. J. Educ. Stud. Math. 2019, 6, 1–18.
  9. Xu, H.; Ball, R. Indigenous Mathematics: From Mainstream Misconceptions to Educational Enrichment. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 2024, 24, 160–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-024-00321-5
  10. Suh, J.M.; Calabrese, S.C. Culturally Responsive Mathematics Engagement through a Family-Inspired Mathematizing Routine. Educ. Stud. Math. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10411-2
  11. Turner, E.; Aguirre, J.; Carlson, M.A.; et al. Resisting Marginalization with Culturally Responsive Mathematical Modeling in Elementary Classrooms. ZDM Math. Educ. 2024, 56, 363–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01542-y
  12. Luzano, J.F.P. Culturally-Responsive Mathematics Teaching Strategies in the Contemporary Academic Tapestry: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 2025, 7, 373–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.347
  13. Payadnya, I.P.A.A.; Wulandari, I.G.A.P.A.; Puspadewi, K.R.; et al. The Significance of Ethnomathematics Learning: A Cross-Cultural Perspective between Indonesian and Thailand Educators. J. Multicult. Educ. 2024, 18, 508–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2024-0049
  14. Department of Education. DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2015: Adopting the Indigenous Peoples Education Curriculum Framework; Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines: Manila, Philippines, 2015. Available online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/DO_s2015_32.pdf
  15. Aguelo, J. Development and Validation of Contextualized Learning Material in Mathematics (Bikol Central) for Kindergarten. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ. 2024, 13, 24749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24749
  16. Molanda, J.M.; Martirez, J.O.; Ambos, M. Project CLMM (Contextualized Learning Materials in Mathematics) Its Effect on the Academic Performance of Grade 7 Students. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Stud. 2024, 7, 274–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i3p117
  17. Alabat, R.L.; Oledan, A.M. A Meta-Synthesis on the Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Ethnomathematics in the Philippine Mathematics Curriculum. J. Educ. Pract. 2024, 15, 8. DOI: https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/62532
  18. Palawan Biodiversity Conservation Advocates, Inc. Palawan: The Last Ecological Frontier. Available online: https://www.palawanconservationists.com/palawan-the-last-ecological-frontier/ (accessed on 2 December 2025).
  19. Briones, S.I.V.; Briones, S.C.; Palmes, M.P. Linking Mathematics and Cultural Practices of the Agta Tabangnon in the Upland Communities of Goa, Philippines. Ethnomath. J. 2023, 4, 149–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ej.v4i2.63235
  20. Villaruz, M.G.; Perez, D. Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education of Indigenous Peoples Learners in Southern Palawan, Philippines. Quantum J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2020, 1, 85–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v1i5.44
  21. Cansino, J.A.S.; Maulad, R.U.; Magbata, S.M.; et al. Teachers' Experiences in the Implementation of Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education in Indigenous People Learner-Dominated School in Southern Palawan, Philippines. Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud. 2022, 32, 33–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v32i230766
  22. Nicol, C.; Thom, J.S.; Doolittle, E.; et al. Mathematics Education for STEM as Place. ZDM Math. Educ. 2023, 55, 1231–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01498-z
  23. Chavarría-Arroyo, G.; Albanese, V. Contextualized Mathematical Problems: Perspective of Teachers about Problem Posing. Educ. Sci. 2022, 13, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010006
  24. Fabrigas, N.J.P.G.; Taban, N.J.G. Contextualization and Localization of Teaching Mathematics in the New Normal. Asian J. Educ. Hum. Dev. 2023, 4, 74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69566/ajehd.v4i1.74
  25. Kyeremeh, P.; Awuah, F.K.; Dorwu, E. Integration of Ethnomathematics in Teaching Geometry: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Report. J. Urban Math. Educ. 2023, 16, 68–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v16i2a519
  26. Barwell, R.; Wessel, L.; Parra, A. Language Diversity and Mathematics Education: New Developments. Res. Math. Educ. 2019, 21, 113–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1638824
  27. Planas, N.; McKinley, J.; Smith, K.; et al. Students’ Linguistic Challenges when Learning Mathematics: Voices of Teachers from Seven Countries. Afr. J. Res. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2025, 29, 239–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2025.2494292
  28. Cortez, C.P. Socio-Cultural Context-Based Inquiry Learning in a Mathematics Flipped Classroom. PhD Thesis, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, 2024. Available online: https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdd_scied/25
  29. Gerardo, L.; Mabansag, A. A Phenomenological Study on the Challenges of Contextualized Mathematics Teaching in the Countryside. SSU Digit. Arch. Theses Diss. 2022, 38, 1–67. Available online: https://datd.ssu.edu.ph/index.php/datd/article/view/19
  30. Alumia Jr., D.L.; Sullivan, M.B.; Martir, E.M. Integration, Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Contextualized Approach. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Stud. 2025, 8, 186–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v8i3p115
  31. Creswell, J.W.; Creswell, J.D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–500.
  32. Nowell, L.S.; Norris, J.M.; White, D.E.; et al. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2017, 16, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847