Attitudes of Graduate Students in Speech and Language Therapy toward Individuals with Special Needs

Journal of Qualitative Research in Education

Articles

Attitudes of Graduate Students in Speech and Language Therapy toward Individuals with Special Needs

Uysal, H. T., Kirazli, M. C., Miraloglu, K., & Kose, A. (2025). Attitudes of Graduate Students in Speech and Language Therapy toward Individuals with Special Needs . Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (45), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.54963/jqre.i45.1991

Authors

  • Halil Tayyip Uysal

    Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Cubuk, Ankara 06760, Türkiye
  • Meltem Cigdem Kirazli

    Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara 06100, Türkiye
  • Kubra Miraloglu

    Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Merkez, Kutahya 43100, Türkiye
  • Aysen Kose

    Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara 06100, Türkiye

Received: 10 July 2025; Revised: 17 October 2025; Accepted: 17 October 2025; Published: 12 January 2026

Understanding the attitudes of healthcare professionals and students is crucial for enhancing the quality and accessibility of services provided to individuals with special needs (IWSN). Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) professionals play a central role in the multidisciplinary support of these individuals, making it essential to explore the perspectives of future practitioners. This study investigates the attitudes of graduate SLT students toward IWSN, with the goal of informing educational practices and contributing to professional development. A qualitative research design was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with 8 graduate-level SLT students enrolled in master’s and doctoral programs. Thematic analysis was conducted using MAXQDA software to identify patterns and insights within the data. The findings revealed that participants generally held positive attitudes toward IWSN, regardless of their level of study. Four overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (a) family relations, (b) academic, social, and public issues, (c) emotional responses of graduate students, and (d) perceived professional needs. Although some students initially expressed hesitation, they reported a shift in attitudes over time, attributing this change largely to experiential learning opportunities. The study highlights the importance of integrating real-life experiences into SLT training programs and promoting broader awareness among students, families, and the wider community to enhance support for IWSN.

Keywords:

Individuals with Special Needs Individuals with Disabilities Graduate Speech and Language Therapy Students Qualitative Design Attitudes

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  2. Clore, G.L.; Jeffery, K.M. Emotional role playing, attitude change, and attraction toward a disabled person. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1972, 23, 105–111.
  3. Goreczny, A.J.; Bender, E.E.; Caruso, G.; et al. Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: Results of a recent survey and implications of those results. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2011, 32, 1596–1609.
  4. Sinha, T.; Parish, A.; Lein Jr., D.H.; et al. Integration of disability awareness improves medical students’ attitudes toward people with disabilities. Med. Sci. Edu. 2024, 34, 561–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02004-0
  5. Yelpaze, I.; Turkum, A.S. Adaptation and validation of Turkey version of multidimensional attitudes toward persons with disabilities. OPUS Int. J. Soc. Res. 2018, 8, 167–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.377906
  6. American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
  7. Douma, I.; Warrens, M.; de Boer, A.; et al. Predicting peer acceptance among students with and without special educational needs in secondary educational settings. Front. Dev. Psychol. 2025, 3, 1380004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2025.1380004
  8. Rose, C.A.; Gage, N.A. Exploring the involvement of bullying among students with disabilities over time. Except. Child. 2017, 83, 298–314.
  9. Sen, M. Employment Policies for People with Disabilities in Türkiye: Problems and Recommendations. SGD Sosyal Güvenlik Derg. 2018, 8, 129–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.493016 (in Turkish)
  10. Ministry of Family and Social Services. Statistics Bulletin on Persons with Disabilities and Elderly; Ministry of Family and Social Services: Ankara, Türkiye, 2023. Available online: https://aile.gov.tr/media/135432/eyhgm_istatistik_bulteni_nisan_23.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2025). (in Turkish)
  11. Burnett, D.L. Preparation of Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Students to Work with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Open Educ. J. 2014, 7, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920820140108001
  12. Stachura, K.; Garven, F. A national survey of occupational therapy students' and physiotherapy students' attitudes to disabled people. Clin. Rehabil. 2007, 21, 442–449.
  13. Kritsotakis, G.; Galanis, P.; Papastefanakis, E.; et al. Attitudes towards people with physical or intellectual disabilities among nursing, social work and medical students. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017, 26, 4951–4963.
  14. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology; ASHA: Rockville, MD, USA, 2016. Available online: https://www.asha.org/siteassets/publications/sp2016-00343.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2024).
  15. Maviş, İ.; Louis, K.O.S.; Özdemir, S.; et al. Attitudes of Turkish speech and language therapists toward stuttering. J. Fluency Disord. 2013, 38, 157–170.
  16. Chen, Y.A.; Miyamoto, S. Attitude of speech-language pathology students and specialists toward people who stutter: Inter-and intraregional comparisons. Perspect. ASHA Spec. Interest Groups 2024, 9, 542–561.
  17. Ajzen, I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 27–58.
  18. Bakanauskas, A.P.; Kondrotienė, E.; Puksas, A. The theoretical aspects of attitude formation factors and their impact on health behaviour. Manag. Organ. Syst. Res. 2020, 83, 15–36.
  19. Satchidanand, N.; Gunukula, S.K.; Lam, W.Y.; et al. Attitudes of healthcare students and professionals toward patients with physical disability: A systematic review. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 91, 533–545.
  20. Student-Friendly Higher Education Council (YÖK). All Universities Offering the Program. Available online: https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=19015 (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  21. Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357.
  22. Smith, J.A. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2004, 1, 39–54.
  23. Rubin, H.J.; Rubin, I.S. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011.
  24. Kuckartz, U.; Rädiker, S. Using MAXQDA for mixed methods research. In The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021. pp. 305–318.
  25. Guba, E.G.; Lincoln, Y.S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research; Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., Eds.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994; pp. 105–117.
  26. Balandin, S.; Hines, M. The involvement of people with lifelong disability and communication impairment in lecturing to speech-language pathology students. Int. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 2011, 13, 436–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.513738
  27. Corden, K.; Brewer, R.; Cage, E. A systematic review of healthcare professionals’ knowledge, self-efficacy and attitudes towards working with autistic people. Rev. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2022, 9, 386–399.
  28. Gore, K.; Gilbert, M.; Hawke, M.; et al. Investigating autism knowledge, self-efficacy, and confidence following maternal and child health nurse training for the early identification of autism. Front. Neurol. 2024, 14, 1201292.
  29. Peiris-John, R.; Jain, N.R.; Hogan, A.; Ameratunga, S. Educating health science students about disability: Teachers’ perspectives on curricular gaps. Disabil. Health J. 2021, 14, 100985.
  30. Aslan, F.; Yücel, E.; Atkins, C.P. Counseling in audiology: Students’ perspectives. J. High. Educ. 2018, 8, 133–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.005
  31. Atkins, C.P. Graduate SLT/Aud clinicians on counseling: Self-perceptions and awareness of boundaries. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord. 2007, 34, 4–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_34_S_4
  32. Phillips, D.T.; Mendel, L.L. Counseling training in communication disorders: A survey of clinical fellows. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord. 2008, 35, 44–53.
  33. Giuntoli, G.; Idle, J.; Newman, C.; et al. Towards a more inclusive society: A scoping review of interventions and policies for changing attitudes towards people with disability. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 2024, 26, 315–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1084