Background: To examine factors influencing satisfaction, perceived disability and handicap and to investigate whether satisfaction correlates with perceived disability and handicap among hearing aid (HA) users in the Turkish population. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study involving 133 patients using unilateral or bilateral HAs was conducted. Data on demographic factors, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, degree of hearing loss, HA experience, HA fitting side, daily HA usage, and HA style were collected. Satisfaction, perceived disability and handicap were assessed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and the Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap (AIADH), respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine factors influencing satisfaction, perceived disability and handicap. Pearson correlation test was used to assess the correlation of satisfaction with perceived disability and handicap. Results: Age, degree of hearing loss, and HA side were significant predictors of APHAB satisfaction scores, while only degree of hearing loss predicted AIADH scores (p < 0.05). Gender and HA experience did not consistently predict outcomes (p > 0.05). A weak negative correlation was obtained between APHAB satisfaction scores and the AIADH disability scores among HA users (p < 0.05; r: −0.390). Conclusion: The study highlights age, degree of hearing loss, and HA side as predictive factors for HA satisfaction. Furthermore,the degree of hearing loss influences perceived disability and handicap. HA satisfaction, perceived disability and handicap did not exhibit a notable relationship among HA users. These findings underscore the importance of healthcare professionals in addressing the specific needs of individuals with HA users to enhance their overall quality of life.

Background: Traumatic tympanic membrane (TM) perforations, although not life-threatening, can significantly impair quality of life by causing hearing loss, tinnitus, and discomfort. These perforations often result from blunt trauma, penetrating trauma, barotrauma, or blast trauma and may be managed either conservatively or surgically, depending on clinical characteristics. Methods: Patients with post-traumatic tympanic membrane perforations were retrospectively evaluated. Trauma type, time of hospital presentation post-trauma, otological complaints at presentation, perforation localization on the membrane, shape, size, and audiometric results were assessed. Results: A total of 48 ears from 47 patients with perforations were evaluated. Most patients (58.3%) presented to the hospital on the first day post-trauma, with initial audiometric evaluation conducted on the same day. Perforations were predominantly in the left ear (58%), anteroinferior quadrant (43.8%), medium-sized (72.9%), and oval/round-shaped (70.8%). Forty-two tympanic membranes underwent repair, while six perforations were managed conservatively. There was no significant difference in perforation healing between the repaired and non-repaired groups at one month post-assessment (p = 1); however, early repair showed statistically superior outcomes compared to late repair (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study contributes to the literature by comprehensively evaluating clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with traumatic tympanic membrane perforations, based on single-center, single-surgeon experience. These findings may assist in determining treatment strategies for managing traumatic tympanic membrane perforations.