New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

Victoria’s Energy Transition using n Bottom Line Analysis

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v2i2.116
Currie, G., Cousins, R., Diplaris, A., Drimer, S., & Foley, M. (2023). Victoria’s Energy Transition using n Bottom Line Analysis. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v2i2.116
Volume 2 Issue 2: December 2023
Copyright (c) 2023 Glen Currie, Riley Cousins, Alexander Diplaris, Sebastian Drimer, Matthew Foley
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Glen Currie
    Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Australia
  • Riley Cousins Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Australia
  • Alexander Diplaris Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Australia
  • Sebastian Drimer Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Australia
  • Matthew Foley Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Australia

To achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, Australia must decarbonise the energy sector and other sectors. The 'energy transition' is driven by policy-led construction of renewable infrastructure and regulation changes. However, no holistic analysis of the path forward currently exists. This research aims to develop a clear plan for Victoria's energy transition by evaluating three scenarios. A Business as Usual (BAU) scenario is compared against two alternative solutions. The alternates emulate two of Victoria's possible trajectories. Alternative 1 (ALT1) focuses on Victoria's reliance on imported interstate renewable energy, while Alternative 2 (ALT2) involves Victoria becoming self-sufficient through renewable generation. Each of the three scenarios is compared across four bottom lines: technical performance, social, economic, and environmental. Interviews among energy experts revealed that economic and social metrics were considered most important. Applying the n-bottom line (nBL) assessment framework delivers a result that finds ALT2 and ALT1 tied as the preferred solution. Hence, the construction of renewable infrastructure in Victoria and increased interstate transmission capacity should be built. Further research could include a deeper understanding of the embodied carbon in infrastructure built for the energy transition.

Keywords:

Energy transition Victoria Mixed-method Renewable energy N bottom Line Electricity Carbon

References

  1. Australian_Government. (2019). Annual Report to the Parliament of Australia. Office of the National Wind Farm Commissioner. Australian_Government. Retrieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://www.aeic.gov.au/ publications/2019-annual-report.
  2. Behrangrad, M. (2015). A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re-views, 47, 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG. 2012. 2203341
  3. Boeri, A., Antonini, E., Gaspari, J., & Longo, D. (2014). Energy design strategies for retrofitting: methodology, technologies and applications. WIT Press. https://doi.org/978-1-84564-998-2
  4. Brazier, R., De Luca, E., de Wit, P., Eklund, H., Gimeno, C., Herbretau, S., & Zawadska, K. (2020). Smart Grid Key Performance Indicators. A DSO perspective. Cedec, EDSO, Geode, Eurelectric. Re-trieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://cdn.eurelectric.org/ media/5272/smart_grid_key_performance_ indi-ca-tors__a_dso_perspective-2021-030-0129-01-e-h-B85F16BF.pdf
  5. Buchanan, K., Russo, R., & Anderson, B. (2015). The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy, 77, 89-96. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.008
  6. Christoff, P. (2013). Climate discourse complexes, national climate regimes and Australian climate policy. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12020
  7. Climate Change Act, (2017). https://www. legisla-tion.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/climate-change-act-2017/007
  8. Cozzi, L., & Motherway, B. (2021). The importance of focusing on jobs and fairness in clean energy transitions. IEA. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-importance-of-focusing-on-jobs-and-fairness-in-clean-energy-transitions
  9. Currie, G. (2020). Australia's Energy Transition. Spring-er.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6145-0
  10. EnergyAustralia. (2021). EnergyAustralia powers ahead with energy transition. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://www.energyaustralia.com.au/about-us/ energy-generation/yallourn-power-station/energy- transition#:~:text=EnergyAustralia%20has%20 reached%20an%20agreement,will%20be%20completed%20by%202026.
  11. Ernst_&_Young_Australia. (2021). CCS Regional Economic Benefit Assessment - Gippsland. Ernst & Young Australia. Retrieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://earthresources.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/695197/CarbonNet-Regional-Economic-Analysis-Report-Gippsland_2021.pdf
  12. Faria, P., Lezama, F., Vale, Z., & Khorram, M. (2021). A methodology for energy key performance indicators analysis. Energy Informatics, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-021-00140-0
  13. Finkel, A., Moses, K., Munro, C., Effeney, T., & OKane, M. (2017). Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the Future. Australian Government. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from http://www.environment. gov.au/energy/publications/electricity-market-final-report
  14. Flannery, T., Stanley, F., & Hanna, L. (2014). Climate Council: Joint Statement of the Health Effects of Coal in Australia. Climate Council. Re-trieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://www.climatecouncil. org.au/resources/health-effects-of-coal/
  15. Foliente, G., Kearns, A., Maheepala, S., Bai, X., & Barnett, G. (2007). Beyond triple bottom line–sustainable cities RD&D at CSIRO. Retrieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://www.researchgate.net/ publica-tion/254970926_Beyond_Triple_Bottom_Line _-_Sustainable_Cities_RDD_at_CSIRO
  16. Government, V. (2016). Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry: Victorian Government Implementation Plan. VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER. https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-01/Hazelwood-Mine-Fire-Inquiry-Vic-Gov- Imple-ment ation-Plan.pdf
  17. Gungor, V. C., Sahin, D., Kocak, T., Ergut, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., & Hancke, G. P. (2011). Smart grid technologies: Communication technol-ogies and standards. IEEE transactions on Industrial informatics, 7(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TII.2011.2166794
  18. Hardisty, P. (2019). Environmental And Economic Sustainability. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NInLBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Environmental+And+Economic+Sustainability&ots = Mi-idkEq3kS&sig=YGQVOs7g-cMDgM0r6SKoJSOkCyw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Environmental%20And%20Economic%20Sustainability&f=false
  19. Hashemi, S., & Østergaard, J. (2017). Methods and strategies for overvoltage prevention in low voltage distribution systems with PV. IET Renewable power generation, 11(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1049/ iet-rpg.2016.0277
  20. International_Energy_Agency. (2021). The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. IEA. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://www.iea.org/ reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean- en-ergy-transitions
  21. Jennens, D. H. (2021). Air Pollution Inquiry- Healthy Futures submission.
  22. Kariuki, D. (2018). Barriers to renewable energy technologies development. Energy Today. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348936339_Barriers_to_Renewable_Energy_Technologies_Development
  23. Kazi, B. K. (2014). Catalytic gasification and as-sessment of Dimethyl ether synthesis from Victo-rian brown coal Monash University].
  24. MacKay, D. (2008). Sustainable Energy-without the hot air. UIT Cambridge. http://www.dspace.cam. ac.uk/handle/1810/217849
  25. Mareels, I., de Hoog, J., Thomas, D., Brazil, M., Alpcan, T., Jayasuriya, D., Muenzel, V., Xia, L., & Kolluri, R. R. (2014). On making energy demand and network constraints compatible in the last mile of the power grid. Annual Reviews in Control, 38(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2014.09. 007
  26. Markard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3(8), 628-633. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7
  27. McGreevy, M., MacDougall, C., Fisher, M., Henley, M., & Baum, F. (2021). Expediting a renewable energy transition in a privatised market via public policy: The case of South Australia 2004-18. En-ergy Policy, 148(111940). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2020.111940
  28. Moss, S. (2020). Costs and Technical Parameter Review. AEMO. Retrieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://aemo.com.au/-/media/files/electricity/nem/planning_and_forecasting/inputs-assumptions -meth odologies/2021/aurecon-cost-and-technical- parameters-review-2020.pdf?la=en
  29. Naus, J., van Vliet, B. J. M., & Hendriksen, A. (2015). Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation. Energy Research & Social Science, 129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.025
  30. Pramangioulis, D., Atsonios, K., Nikolopoulos, N., Rakopoulos, D., Grammelis, P., & Kakaras, E. (2019). A methodology for determination and defi-nition of key performance indicators for smart grids development in island energy systems. Energies, 12(2), 242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ en12020242
  31. Reuters. (2021). China aims to install over 30 GW of new energy storage by 2025. Reuters. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://www.reuters.com/business/ energy/china-aims-install-over-30-gw-new-energy -storage-by-2025-2021-07-23/
  32. Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027
  33. Sunpower. (2019). Maxeon 3 400W Datasheet. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://www.solargain. com.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/Sunpower%20Maxeon%203%20Datasheet.pdf
  34. United_Nations. (2015). Paris agreement. Hei-nOnline. Retrieved 5 Jan 2022 from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  35. Watson, J., Sonter, L., & Valenta, R. K. (2020, August 2). Renewable energy can save the natural world – but if we’re not careful, it will also hurt it. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://theconversation. com/renewable-energy-can-save-the-natural-world-but-if-were-not-careful-it-will-also-hurt-it-145166
  36. Weller, S. A. (2018). Globalisation, marketisation and the transformation of Australia’s electricity sector. Australian Geographer, 49(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2017.1385117
  37. Wood, T., Blowers, D., & Moran, G. (2017). Price shock: is the retail electricity market failing con-sumers? Grattan Institute. Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/03/Price-shock-is-the-retail-market-failing-consumers.pdf
  38. World_Bank. (2018). Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output). Retrieved 5 Dec 2021 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS
  39. Zachmann, G., Fredriksson, G., & Claeys, G. (2018). The distributional effects of climate poli-cies. Bruegel. https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/11/Bruegel_Blueprint_28_final1.pdf