Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

Academic Leaders’ Experiences of Inclusive Education through the Lens of Positive Psychology

Jason V. Chavez ORCID ,  Rolly G. Salvaleon ORCID ,  Maria Lady Sol A. Suazo ORCID ,  Abundio C. Miralles ORCID ,  Maria Cristina S. Dela Cerna ORCID ,  Sitti Khadija M. Dammang ORCID ,  Nuryneil M. Joe ORCID ,  Cindy May P. Tacbobo ORCID ,  Kier P. Dela Calzada ORCID

    Received: 17 December 2025; Revised: 2 January 2026; Accepted: 22 January 2026; Published: 3 March 2026

    Abstract

    This study explored how academic leaders applied principles of positive psychology in fostering inclusive educational environments and examined how positive psychological traits shaped their leadership experiences, challenges, and strategies. Anchored in an exploratory qualitative research design, the study sought to capture the lived experiences and leadership practices of academic leaders within diverse institutional contexts. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with eighteen (18) academic leaders, allowing for in-depth insights into how inclusion was enacted beyond formal policies. The collected data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and meanings across participants’ narratives. Findings revealed that academic leaders operationalized positive psychology through hope-oriented practices, well-being initiatives, strengths-based leadership approaches, and the intentional cultivation of belongingness within their institutions. These practices played a significant role in nurturing inclusive cultures by promoting psychological safety, collaboration, mutual respect, and active engagement among both students and staff. Moreover, the results highlighted that positive psychological traits, particularly resilience, optimism, empathy, and gratitude, served as essential leadership resources. These traits enabled leaders to navigate institutional constraints, sustain inclusive initiatives over time, and respond adaptively to resistance, change, and learner diversity. The study concluded that inclusive education was strengthened not solely through policies, frameworks, or structural mechanisms, but through everyday leadership practices grounded in positive psychological principles. Embodying and modeling these traits, academic leaders translated inclusive ideals into meaningful institutional practice. The study concluded that inclusive education was strengthened not only through policies and structural mechanisms but through leadership practices grounded in positive psychological principles, underscoring the central role of academic leaders in translating inclusion from policy intent into institutional practice.

    References

    1. 1. Leow, K.; Leow, S.; Chee, K.F.; et al. The Role of Positive Psychology in Promoting Student Well-Being. In Nurturing Student Well-Being in the Modern World; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024.
    2. 2. Coulombe, S.; Hardy, K.; Goldfarb, R. Promoting wellbeing through positive education: A critical review and proposed social ecological approach. Theory Res. Educ. 2020, 18, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878520988432
    3. 3. Gao, J.; Samsilah, R.; Kim, G.S.; et al. Effects of positive education intervention on growth mindset and resilience among boarding middle school adolescents in China: A randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 144626.
    4. 4. Leon, A.J.T.D.; Jumalon, R.L.; Chavez, J.V.; et al. Analysis on the implementation of inclusive classroom: Perception on compliances and obstructions of selected public-school teachers. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 2537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2537
    5. 5. Karakasidou, E.; Raftopoulou, G.; Raftopoulou, K.; et al. Positive Education in Schools: Teachers’ Practices and Well-Being. Psychol. Int. 2025, 7, 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7020051
    6. 6. Huppert, F.A.; Johnson, D.M. A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: The relevance of positive education. J. Posit. Psychol. 2010, 5, 264–274.
    7. 7. Oh-Young, C.; Filler, J. Inclusive education outcomes: Academic achievement and social contact. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2015, 19, 1–15.
    8. 8. Nakken, H.; Pijl, S.J. Social contact in inclusive settings. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2002, 6, 1–12.
    9. 9. Deroncele-Acosta, A.; Ellis, A. Overcoming challenges and promoting positive education in inclusive schools: A multi-country study. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111169
    10. 10. Adalia, H.G.; Chavez, J.V.; Hayudini, M.A.A.; et al. Relevance of Grammar among Gen Z College Students Using Social Learning Perspectives. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2025, 7, 432–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8401
    11. 11. Hall, D.A.; Juliana, J.; Manickam, M.; et al. Contributions of positive psychology to higher education across Asia: A scoping review and unifying thematic framework. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2023, 32, 1275–1285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00798-y
    12. 12. Chavez, J.V.; Del Prado, R.; Estoque, M. Disrupted income of women educators during pandemic: Economic effects, adaptive strategies, and government recovery initiatives. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 2023, 7, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i2.1973
    13. 13. Kilag, O.K.; Diano Jr., F.; Bulilan, R.; et al. Leadership strategies for building inclusive school communities: The challenges of managing diversity in schools. Int. J. Incl. Sustain. Educ. 2024, 2, 92–100.
    14. 14. Ainscow, M. Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy 2020, 6, 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
    15. 15. Joyno, A.T. Development of research tool for inclusive education in the Philippine context. Int. J. Innov. Res. Multidiscip. Educ. 2025, 4, 320–334.
    16. 16. Chavez, J.V. Academic and Health Insecurities of Indigent Students during Pandemic: Study on Adaptive Strategies under Learning Constraints. J. Multidiscip. Soc. Sci. 2020, 16, 74–81.
    17. 17. Cherkowski, S.; Kutsyuruba, B.; Walker, K. Positive leadership: Animating purpose, presence, passion and play for flourishing in schools. J. Educ. Adm. 2020, 58, 401–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2019-0076
    18. 18. Goel, S.; Mohammad, A.; Wani, M. The Power of Psychological Capital: A Comprehensive Review of Data on Resilience, Hope, Optimism, and Efficacy. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 2024, 27, 2182–2191.
    19. 19. Chavez, J.V.; Cuilan, J.T.; Mannan, S.S.; et al. Discourse Analysis on the Ethical Dilemmas on the Use of AI in Academic Settings from ICT, Science, and Language Instructors. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2024, 6, 349–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6765
    20. 20. Edara, I.R.; del Castillo, F.; Ching, G.S.; et al. Religiosity and Contentment among Teachers in the Philippines during COVID-19 Pandemic: Mediating Effects of Resilience, Optimism, and Well-Being. Religions 2021, 12, 879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100879
    21. 21. Onan, G.; Sürücü, L.; Bekmezci, M.; et al. Relationships between Positive Leadership Styles, Psychological Resilience, and Burnout: An Empirical Study among Turkish Teachers. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060713
    22. 22. Mugabekazi, J.C.; Mukanziza, J.; Nizeyimana, P.; et al. Emotional intelligence in educational leadership: A systematic review of impacts and challenges. Cogent Educ. 2026, 13, 2615486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2615486
    23. 23. Culduz, M. The Impact of Educational Leadership in Improving the Learning Experience; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8332-9.ch008
    24. 24. Mbelu, S.E. Ethical leadership in full-service schools: The (im)possibilities of inclusive practice in South Africa. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2025, 29, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2581759
    25. 25. Sese, L.V.C.; Guillermo, M.C.L. A story of hope: How a community project is transforming the lives of Filipino children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Clin. Pediatr. 2023, 62, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X231211215
    26. 26. Navas-Bonilla, C.d.R.; Guerra-Arango, J.A.; Oviedo-Guado, D.A.; et al. Inclusive education through technology: A systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. Front. Educ. 2025, 10, 1527851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851
    27. 27. Gelizon, M.J.B. Qualitative exploration in mainstreaming classroom inclusivity through the lenses of anti-bias education (ABE). Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2025, 9, 3233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3233
    28. 28. Lamorinas, D.D.; Luna, L.A.; Lai, M.N.D.; et al. A General Perspective on the Factors Influencing the Low Preferences of Gen Z College Students towards the Filipino Language. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2025, 7, 451–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8482
    29. 29. Shabalala, N.P. Global citizenship education as a strategy for social, justice and identity: Achieving balance for meaningful social impact. Glob. Soc. Educ. 2025, 23, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2025.2537371
    30. 30. Zurba, M.; Suchet-Pearson, S.; Bullock, R.; et al. Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums. Environ. Sci. Policy 2024, 162, 103864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103864
    31. 31. Valentos, H.L.; Junsay, M. Voices from the field: A narrative case study on inclusive education as reflection for practice, policy, and research. Mindoro J. Soc. Sci. Dev. Stud. 2025, 2, 52–65.
    32. 32. Enriquez, V. Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Perspektibo at Direksiyon; University of the Philippines Press: Quezon City, Philippines, 1976. (in Filipino)
    33. 33. Juanillo, C. Exploring the Philippine Cultural Value “Malasakit” in Filipino Mental Health Care: A Narrative Analysis. Psychol. Educ. 2026, 51, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.510801
    34. 34. Jain, N. Survey Versus Interviews: Comparing Data Collection Tools for Exploratory Research. Qual. Rep. 2021, 26, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492
    35. 35. Bucoy, R.K.; Enumerabellon, K.M.; Amilhamja, A.J.; et al. Knowledge deficits and analysis on comprehension of teachers on their common legal rights as teachers. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 2559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2559
    36. 36. Bernarte, R.A. Doing Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences; Rex BookStore: Manila, Philippines, 2021.
    37. 37. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    38. 38. Creswell, J.W.; Poth, C.N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018.
    39. 39. Dweck, C.S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
    40. 40. Pillow, D.R.; Malone, G.P.; Hale, W.J. The need to belong and its association with fully satisfying relationships: A tale of two measures. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2015, 74, 259–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.031
    41. 41. Chavez, J.V.; Garil, B.A.; Padirque, C.B.; et al. Assessing innovative and responsive young leaders in public service: Lens from community clientele. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 2876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2876
    42. 42. Clifton, D.O.; Harter, J.K. Investing in strengths. In Positive Organizational Scholarship; Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., Quinn, R.E., Eds.; Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 111–121.
    43. 43. Tadayon Nabavi, R.; Bijandi, M. Bandura’s Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory; University of Science and Culture: Tehran, Iran, 2012.
    44. 44. Bwalya, A. Leadership Styles. J. Entrep. Manag. Innov. 2023, 11, 181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23932113
    45. 45. Masten, A. Ordinary magic: Resilience process in development. Am. Psychol. 2001, 56, 227–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
    46. 46. Li, T.; Tang, N. Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Performance: A Multi-Level Mediation Model of Psychological Safety. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 934831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831
    47. 47. Heenan, I.W.; Lafferty, N.; McNamara, P.M. An Applied Approach to Transformational Leadership for Whole School Communities: Perspectives of Primary School and System Leaders. Societies 2024, 14, 275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120275
    48. 48. Manke, S.N.; Pietsch, M.; Freund, P.A. The role of empathy and empathic leadership practices in schools—A scoping review. Educ. Rev. 2025, 77, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2025.2510969
    49. 49. Mundo, M.A.D.; Reyes, E.F.D.; Gervacio, E.M. Discourse analysis on experience-based position of science, mathematics, and Tech-Voc educators on generative AI and academic integrity. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 3028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.3028
    50. 50. Emmons, R.A.; McCullough, M.E. Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84, 377–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377
    51. 51. Rachmad, Y.E. Resilient Empathy Theory. Available online: https://osf.io/w4c3x/files/9xkcj (accessed on 12 December 2025).
    52. 52. Waugh, C.E.; Sali, A.W. Resilience as the Ability to Maintain Well-Being: An Allostatic Active Inference Model. J. Intell. 2023, 11, 158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11080158
    ×