Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

Fostering Cultural Self‑Awareness through Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Case Study of EFL Pedagogy in Chinese Higher Education

Jing Hou ORCID ,  Xiaoming Tian ORCID ,  Ruoyi Yang ORCID

    Received: 30 June 2026; Revised: 14 July 2026; Accepted: 27 August 2026; Published: 18 September 2026

    Abstract

    In many Chinese university English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms, culture is still presented as a collection of factual information regarding festivals, foods, and other visible symbols. Students may recognize these items without being able to explain what they mean or to discuss Chinese cultural experience critically in English. This study develops and examines a localized Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) sequence designed to foster cultural self-awareness and cultural narrative competence through three stages: critically unpacking cultural representations, comparing local and foreign cultural practices, and producing multimodal narratives. A single-group pre-post mixed-methods case study was conducted with 29 first-year engineering students at a local university over a 16-week semester. Evidence came from Likert questionnaires, language tests, classroom worksheets and mind maps, oral presentations, and English vlogs assessed with a three-dimensional rubric for cultural self-awareness, linguistic performance, and multimodal production. The results show the largest gains in cultural self-awareness and multimodal storytelling, with more modest progress in linguistic accuracy. Classroom records suggest that comparative inquiry and hometown-based vlog work helped students move beyond naming cultural objects toward explaining their social and personal significance. These findings provide preliminary, triangulated evidence associated with the localized CRT sequence and illustrate how CRT can be operationalized through comparative inquiry and multimodal cultural narrative production in Chinese university EFL instruction. The study also offers an empirically grounded pedagogical model and a basis for further comparative research on culturally responsive EFL pedagogy.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1.Wang, Q.; Teo, T. Explaining the relationships among components of intercultural competence: A structural equation modelling approach. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2024, 99, 101953.
    2. 2.Fei, X.T. The Intellectual Origins and Contemporary Significance of Cultural Self-Awareness. Wen Shi Zhe 2003, 3, 15–16, 23. (in Chinese)
    3. 3.Zhang, H.; Nordin, N.R.M. Cultural representation in Chinese university English language teaching textbooks. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 9–15.
    4. 4.Lu, B.; Shao, X.; Ge, L.; et al. Challenges and opportunities in implementing intercultural education in higher education: The perceptions and practice of foreign language teachers in a Chinese university. Lang. Intercult. Commun. 2026, 26, 87–103.
    5. 5.He, J.M. Analysis of the current state of cultural self-awareness among college students. Sch. Party Build. Ideol. Educ. 2019, 10, 56–58. (in Chinese)
    6. 6.Bruner, J. Life as narrative. Soc. Res. 2004, 71, 691–710.
    7. 7.Arnold, J. Affect in Language Learning; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999.
    8. 8.Gay, G. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
    9. 9.Richards, H.V.; Brown, A.F.; Forde, T.B. Addressing diversity in schools: Culturally responsive pedagogy. Teach. Except. Child. 2007, 39, 64–68.
    10. 10.Paris, D. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice. Educ. Res. 2012, 41, 93–97.
    11. 11.Wlodkowski, R.J.; Ginsberg, M.B. Diversity and Motivation: Culturally Responsive Teaching in College, 2nd ed.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009.
    12. 12.Huang, L. Developing intercultural competence through a cultural metacognition-featured instructional design in English as a foreign language classrooms. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1126141.
    13. 13.Liao, H.; Li, L. Facilitating EFL Learners’ Intercultural Competence through Culturally Responsive Teaching in Oral English Classrooms. System 2023, 115, 103070.
    14. 14.Wang, G. The model of “culturally responsive teaching” and foreign language teaching reform in ethnic regions. Ethn. Educ. Res. 2018, 29, 65–70. (in Chinese)
    15. 15.Kong, D.; Zou, M.; Chen, J. English as a Foreign Language Teacher Engagement with Culturally Responsive Teaching in Rural Schools: Insights from China. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 990363.
    16. 16.Zhou, R.; Samad, A.; Perinpasingam, T. A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Communicative Competence in EFL Teaching: Insights from China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1750.
    17. 17.Guo, Y.H.; Guo, Y.X. The cross-cultural expression of linguistic nationality and narrativity: How foreign language teaching can tell China’s story well. Glob. Educ. Outlook 2025, 54, 82–94. (in Chinese)
    18. 18.Moll, L.C.; Amanti, C.; Neff, D.; et al. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Pract. 1992, 31, 132–141.
    19. 19.Hull, G.A.; Nelson, M.E. Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Commun. 2005, 22, 224–261.
    20. 20.Harper, J. Using Byram’s Savoirs to Ensure the Incorporation of Intercultural Communicative Competence into Language Teaching. J. Engl. Lang. Teach. Linguist. 2023, 8, 227–236.
    21. 21.Fang, X. Chinese English teachers’ attitudes towards a multicultural approach to English language teaching in China’s college classrooms. Taiwan J. TESOL 2022, 19, 145–174.
    22. 22.Gardner, R.C. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. In Bilingualism, Multiculturalism, and Second Language Learning; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 43–63.
    23. 23.Messick, S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am. Psychol. 1995, 50, 741–749.
    24. 24.Noels, K.A.; Pelletier, L.G.; Clément, R.; et al. Why Are You Learning a Second Language? Motivational Orientations and Self-Determination Theory. Lang. Learn. 2000, 50, 57–85.
    25. 25.Byram, M. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence: Revisited; Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK, 2020.
    26. 26.Yu, S.; Di Zhang, E.; Liu, C. Research into practice: Digital multimodal composition in second language writing. Lang. Teach. 2026, 59, 197–213.
    27. 27.Vygotsky, L.S.; Cole, M. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978; pp. 84–91.
    28. 28.Darvin, R. Identity and Investment in the Age of Generative AI. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 2025, 45, 10–27.
    29. 29.New London Group. A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harv. Educ. Rev. 1996, 66, 60–93.
    30. 30.Kim, H.J. Guidelines for culturally and linguistically responsive instruction in higher education. TESOL J. 2024, 15, e807.
    31. 31.Wesley-Nero, S. Culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy: Examining teachers’ conceptualizations of affirmative instructional practices for multilingual learners. TESOL J. 2024, 15, e881.
    32. 32.Kehl, J.; Krachum Ott, P.; Schachner, M.; et al. Culturally responsive teaching in question: A multiple case study examining the complexity and interplay of teacher practices, beliefs, and microaggressions in Germany. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2024, 152, 104772.
    33. 33.Ialuna, F.; Civitillo, S.; Jugert, P. Culturally responsive teaching, teacher-student relationship and school belongingness: A multi-informant study in ethnically diverse classrooms. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 2024, 47, 100839.
    34. 34.Lan, Q. Culturally responsive teaching practices and student attitude towards learning the English language in China. Int. J. Educ. Humanit. 2024, 14, 108–113.
    ×