What Sustains Academic Buoyancy of Vietnamese English-as-a-Foreign-Language Teachers Navigating Graduate Education?

Phan Nhat Hao ORCID ,  Le Hoang Phuc ORCID
    Received: 14 June 2026; Revised: 6 July 2026; Accepted: 17 July 2026; Published: 21 July 2026

    Abstract

    Academic buoyancy enables teachers to manage academic challenges associated with professional life. Despite increasing interest, little is known about what sustains academic buoyancy among English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) teachers pursuing further education. Drawing upon Hobfoll’s Conservation of Resources Theory, this qualitative multiple-case study traces how Vietnamese teachers manage their unique resources to remain academically buoyant in graduate education. Five teachers enrolled in Master’s programs in Teaching English as a Foreign Language participated in two rounds of in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The findings indicated that academic buoyancy is sustained by four resource domains. Personal resources (future-oriented aspirations, self-regulation, and personal teaching experiences) provide a foundation for enduring academic pressures. Psychological resources (optimism, perseverance, and self-efficacy) enable participants to embrace their day-to-day challenges as opportunities for personal growth. Institutional resources (administrative flexibility and alignment between graduate coursework and teaching responsibilities) reduce workload-based strain. Socio-cultural resources (Confucian values, professional prestige, and familial support) further reinforce participants’ persistence and intrinsic motivation. The study extends the theory by shedding light on how various resource domains sustain academic buoyancy among language teachers partaking in their continuing professional learning. Pedagogical implications are offered for various stakeholders seeking to aid teachers’ development as lifelong learners.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. Quoc Lap, T.; Nhat Hao, P.; Cong Tuan, L. Examining teacher-researcher identity construction of a novice teacher from dialogical perspectives. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2025, 12, 102025.
    2. 2. Kritikou, M.; Giovazolias, T. Emotion regulation, academic buoyancy, and academic adjustment of university students within a self-determination theory framework: A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1057697.
    3. 3. Putwain, D.W.; Daumiller, M.; Hussain, T.; et al. Revisiting the relation between academic buoyancy and coping: A network analysis. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2024, 78, 102283.
    4. 4. Martin, A.J.; Marsh, H.W. Investigating the reciprocal relations between academic buoyancy and academic adversity: Evidence for the protective role of academic buoyancy in reducing academic adversity over time. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2020, 44, 301–312.
    5. 5. Khotbesara, Z.E.; Mahdian, H.; Bakhshipour, A. Comparing the effectiveness of academic buoyancy and psychological capital training on academic procrastination in female high school students. Iran. J. Educ. Sociol. 2024, 7, 149–160.
    6. 6. Huang, S. A review of the relationship between EFL teachers’ academic buoyancy, ambiguity tolerance, and hopelessness. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 831258.
    7. 7. Dong, H.; Li, W.; Ye, D. The influence of English as a foreign language teachers’ positive mood and hope on their academic buoyancy: A theoretical review. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 801435.
    8. 8. Ding, J.; He, L. On the association between Chinese EFL teachers’ academic buoyancy, self-efficacy, and burnout. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 947434.
    9. 9. Li, X.; Duan, S.; Liu, H. Unveiling the predictive effect of students’ perceived EFL teacher support on academic achievement: The mediating role of academic buoyancy. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10205.
    10. 10. Mohammad-Hosseini, H.; Derakhshesh, A.; Fathi, J.; et al. Examining the relationships between mindfulness, grit, academic buoyancy and boredom among EFL learners. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2024, 27, 1357–1386.
    11. 11. Liu, H.; Chen, B.; Li, X.; et al. Exploring the predictive role of self-efficacy in engagement among EFL teachers in online teaching: The mediation of buoyancy. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2024, 33, 879–888.
    12. 12. Zhi, R.; Wang, Y.; Derakhshan, A. On the role of academic buoyancy and self-efficacy in predicting teachers’ work engagement: A case of Chinese English as a foreign language teachers. Percept. Mot. Skills 2024, 131, 612–629.
    13. 13. Fu, L. Social support in class and learning burnout among Chinese EFL learners in higher education: Are academic buoyancy and class level important? Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 5789–5803.
    14. 14. Zhang, F.; Derakhshan, A. On the role of academic buoyancy and interpersonal emotion regulation in predicting Chinese EFL teachers’ psychological well-being. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2025, 133, 102722.
    15. 15. Ministry of Education and Training. Circular No. 20/2018/TT-BGDĐT: Promulgating Regulation on Professional Standards for Teachers of General Education Institutions; Ministry of Education and Training: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2018.
    16. 16. Ministry of Education and Training. Circular No. 02/2020/TT-BGDĐT on Standards for Assessment of Teacher Training Programs at College and Post-Secondary Levels; Ministry of Education and Training: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2020.
    17. 17. Ministry of Education and Training. Circular No. 23/2021/TT-BGDĐT Promulgating the Regulations on Enrollment and Training at the Master’s Level; Ministry of Education and Training: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2021.
    18. 18. Phan, N.H.; Tran, H.Q. “Beyond a thesis”: A duo-narrative inquiry into possible selves of Generation-Z EFL teachers in graduate education. Appl. Res. Engl. Lang. 2025, 14, 45–76.
    19. 19. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524.
    20. 20. Hobfoll, S.E.; Hou, W.K. Conservation of resources theory and traumatic stress placed in the context of meaning-making: An evolutionary ecological perspective. In The Routledge International Handbook of Human Significance and Mattering; Kruglanski, A.W., Prilleltensky, I., Raviv, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2025; pp. 289–301.
    21. 21. Russell, E.; Halbesleben, J. Conceptualizing personality traits as “resource catalysts”: An extension to the conservation of resources (COR) theory. Appl. Psychol. 2026, 75, e70074.
    22. 22. Schiff, M.; Pat-Horenczyk, R.; Benbenishty, R. Using conservation of resources theory to explain university students’ anxiety, depression, and learning experience during COVID-19. J. Am. Coll. Health 2025, 73, 1815–1824.
    23. 23. Yin, R.K. Designing case studies. Qual. Res. Methods 2003, 5, 359–386.
    24. 24. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101.
    25. 25. Guba, E.G.; Lincoln, Y.S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research; Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., Eds.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994; pp. 105–117.
    ×