How Can We Use the Memoirs of Famous Managers in Digital Environment?

Journal of Intelligent Communication

Article

How Can We Use the Memoirs of Famous Managers in Digital Environment?

[1]
Tyapukhin, A.P. 2026. How Can We Use the Memoirs of Famous Managers in Digital Environment?. Journal of Intelligent Communication. 5, 1 (Jun. 2026), 82–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v5i1.1966.

Authors

  • Alexey Petrovich Tyapukhin

    Department of Digital Economics and Logistics, Orenburg Branch, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 460003 Orenburg, Russia

Received: 30 November 2025; Revised: 29 December 2025; Accepted: 31 December 2025; Published: 14 January 2026

In today's rapidly changing business environment, organizations and supply chains face increasing socio-economic challenges. To address these challenges, they need new sources of growth and development. One of these sources is lost profits or profits that could be recouped by maximizing the benefits provided by the external environment. To reduce lost profits, organizations and supply chain need intellectual support based on the knowledge and experience of famous managers from past and current generations. Memoirs of these managers presented in the form of software products can be used to share their insights and best practices with current and future managers. The purpose of this article is to develop recommendations for creating digital memoirs of famous managers to design a digital twin for managing organizations and supply chains allowing them to minimize lost profits. To achieve this purpose, terminological analysis, descriptive and faceted methods of qualitative research of non-physical management objects were used. These methods have made it possible to identify, formalize, structure, combine, and digitize objects of this type. This article develops a classification and substantiates the structure of digital systems formed in organizations and supply chains. It also creates a template and form of digital memories of famous managers for use in the digital twin of management of these organizations and supply chains. The results obtained allow us to create an artificial intelligence that operates with non-physical management objects and еру digital twin to manage the organization and supply chain. This ensures the development of management decisions with minimal loss of profit.

Keywords:

Memoirs Management Decision Template Form Artificial Intelligence Digital Twin

References

  1. Liu, N.; Ren, S. Production disruption in supply chain systems: impacts on consumers, supply chain agents and the society. Ann. Oper. Res. 2025, 344, 965–988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05782-9
  2. Tyapukhin, A.P. Matrix approach to digitalization of management objects. J. Model. Manag. 2024, 19, 119–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2022-0057
  3. Breque, M.; De Nul, L.; Petridis, A. Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry; European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
  4. Oh, H. Price fairness and its asymmetric effects on overall price, quality, and value judgments: The case of an upscale hotel. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 241–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00109-7
  5. Phung, D.; Colón-González, F.J.; Weinberger, D.M.; et al. Advancing adoptability and sustainability of digital prediction tools for climate-sensitive infectious disease prevention and control. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56826-6
  6. Chen, F.; Drezner, Z.; Ryan, J.K.; et al. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead time and information. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 436–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069
  7. Kaluvilla, B.B.; Mulla, T.; Zahidi, F. Driving sustainable choices through understanding consumer behaviour and underlying factors that influence the purchasing intention of refurbished furniture. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01497-y
  8. Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2008, 36, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
  9. Buzzotta, V.R.; Lefton, R.E.; Sherberg, M. Effective Selling through Psychology: Dimensional Sales and Sales Management; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 1–334.
  10. Holdford, D. Consumer Behavior. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330026555_CONSUMER_BEHAVIOR (accessed on 11 November 2025).
  11. Akasreku, F.; Mensah, K.; Amenuvor, F.E.; et al. Using the theory of interpersonal behaviour to determine sustainable consumer behaviour in purchasing secondhand clothes in developing economies. SN Bus. Econ. 2025, 5, 166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-025-00934-4
  12. Potra, S.; Izvercian, M. Customer value placed under scrutiny: New perspectives for an integrative co-creation approach. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Genoa, Italy, 17–18 September 2015; pp. 555–560.
  13. Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211, 453–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  14. Kumar, V.; Reinartz, W. Customer Relationship Management: Concept, Strategy, and Tools, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2006; pp. 1–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55381-7
  15. Sun, Z. Determining human resource management key indicators and their impact on organizational performance using deep reinforcement learning. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86910-2
  16. Chong, L.; Ngolob, R.A.; Thelma, D.; et al. Human resource management (HRM) practices. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 2020, 8, 121–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.8.4.121-125
  17. Purcell, J.; Kinnie, N.; Hutchinson, S.; et al. Understanding the People and Performance Link: Unlocking the Black Box; CIPD: London, UK, 2003; pp. 1–88.
  18. Yan, T.; Zeng, Y.; Dong, J.; et al. A human resource management performance evaluation method based on a numerical membrane computing model. J. Membr. Comput. 2025, 7, 68–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41965-024-00162-z
  19. Boselie, P.; Dietz, G.; Boon, C. Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2005, 15, 67–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
  20. Pranavi, E.; Mahindrakar, S.; Latha, T.M.; et al. Artificial intelligence reshaping human resource management. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communications and Cyber Physical Engineering, Hyderabad, India, 28–29 February 2024; pp. 1144–1152.
  21. Foss, N.J.; Laursen, K.; Pedersen, T. Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22, 980–999.
  22. Coyle, J.J.; Langley, C.J.; Novack, R.A.; et al. Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective, 9th ed.; South-Western Cengage Learning: Mason, OH, USA, 2013; pp. 1–705.
  23. Christopher, M. Logistics & Supply Chain Management, 4th ed.; Pearson Education: Harlow, UK, 2011; pp. 1–360.
  24. Wisner, J.; Tan, K.C.; Leong, G.K. Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach, 3rd ed.; South-Western Cengage Learning: Mason, OH, USA, 2012; pp. 1–592.
  25. Sustainable Supply Chains: A Guide for Small- to Medium-Sized Manufacturers. Available online: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/conferences/2015-strategy-research/Documents/Sustainable%20Supply%20Chains.pdf (accessed on 11 November 2025).
  26. Raut, R.D.; Bhasin, H.V.; Kamble, S.S. Supplier selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 13, 359–394.
  27. Chechnev, V.B. Using decision-support systems in the automation of decision-making processes. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 2025, 59, S67–S73.
  28. Brau, R.I.; Sanders, N.R.; Aloysius, J.; et al. Utilizing people, analytics, and AI for decision making in the digitalized retail supply chain. J. Bus. Logist. 2024, 45, e12355.
  29. Sankaran, G.; Knahl, M.; Siestrup, G.; et al. A measurement model of value of data for decision-making in the digital era. Int. J. Integr. Supply Manag. 2021, 14, 50–76.
  30. Dey, M.T. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Integration, policy frameworks, and applications in critical domains and renewable energy. In Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Solar Energy Integration; Pandey, J.K., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 333–362.
  31. Burstein, F.; Holsapple, C. Handbook on Decision Support Systems; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 1–854.
  32. Stone, J.; Love, D. Modelling the relationship between local logistics management decisions and overall supply chain performance: A research agenda. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manag. 2007, 9, 240–252.
  33. Xiao, J.; Ma, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Meta-inventory management decisions: A theoretical model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2024, 275, 109339.
  34. Nicoletti, B.; Appolloni, A. A framework for digital twins solutions for 5PL operators. Technol. Soc. 2024, 76, 102415.
  35. Mintzberg, H. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 1–312.
  36. The Macroeconomics of Supply Chain Disruptions. Available online: https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2023-10/The%20Macroeconomics%20of%20Supply%20Chain%20Disruptions.pdf (accessed on 9 July 2025).
  37. Rashid, H.U.; Jeong, S.H. AI-empowered 6G technologies and network layers: Recent trends, opportunities, and challenges. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 267, 125985.
  38. Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhao, S.; et al. Evolving towards artificial-intelligence-driven sixth-generation mobile networks. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2920.
  39. Jiang, C.; Ge, N.; Kuang, L. AI-enabled next-generation communication networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 129–133.
  40. Palazzo, S.; Palazzo, F.; Zambetta, G. The role of artificial intelligence in advanced engineering. J. Intell. Comput. 2025, 4, 1–30.
  41. Tracy, S.J. The toxic and mythical combination of a deductive writing logic for inductive qualitative research. Qual. Commun. Res. 2012, 1, 109–141.
  42. Cropley, A.J. Qualitative Research Methods: A Practice-Oriented Introduction; University of Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–304.
  43. Stock, J.; Boyer, S. Developing a consensus definition of supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2009, 39, 690–711.
  44. Yang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Liu, X.; et al. Modeling and analysis of cyber-physical systems based on Petri net. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2023, 21, 2980–2994.
  45. Colombathanthri, A.; Jomaa, W.; Chinniah, Y.A. Human-centered cyber-physical systems in manufacturing industry: a systematic search and review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2025, 136, 2107–2141.
  46. Tyapukhin, A.P. Theoretical prerequisites for designing a digital twin of value chain management. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 2024, 15, 15–40.