Integrated Soil–Water–Ecological Risk Assessment in Shyama Sundari Canal, Rangpur Using Structural Equation Modeling

Journal of Hydrological Ecology and Water Security

Article

Integrated Soil–Water–Ecological Risk Assessment in Shyama Sundari Canal, Rangpur Using Structural Equation Modeling

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/jhews.v1i2.2088
Monir, M. M., & Akhter, S. (2025). Integrated Soil–Water–Ecological Risk Assessment in Shyama Sundari Canal, Rangpur Using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Hydrological Ecology and Water Security, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.54963/jhews.v1i2.2088
Volume 1 Issue 2 (2025): In Progress

Authors

  • Md. Moniruzzaman Monir

    Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5404, Bangladesh
  • Shapla Akhter

    Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5404, Bangladesh

Received: 14 June 2025; Revised: 1 August 2025; Accepted: 16 August 2025; Published: 1 September 2025

Urban canals in rapidly expanding cities are under increasing pressure from combined soil and water pollution, leading to ecological degradation. This study evaluates soil quality, water quality, and associated ecological risk in the Shyama Sundari Canal, Rangpur, using Water Quality Index (WQI), Soil Quality Index (SQI), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Physicochemical water quality was assessed at six locations, while soil properties were analyzed from 100 adjacent sampling points. The calculated WQI values ranged from 121.89 to 173.52, classifying canal water as poor to very poor throughout the study area. High biochemical oxygen demand (266.40–423.54 mg/L) and chemical oxygen demand (205.00–465.00 mg/L) were the dominant contributors, indicating substantial organic and chemical pollution. Mean SQI values ranged from 0.45 to 0.78, with higher soil quality in some locations and lower quality in others due to acidic pH and fine-textured soils. SEM results showed that soil contamination and water pollution are positively related, with water pollution and soil contamination having the strongest impact on ecological risk. This study highlights the novel integration of soil–water quality assessment with SEM to elucidate coupled degradation pathways. The results provide actionable insights for urban planners and environmental managers, emphasizing the need for integrated management strategies targeting both wastewater and canal sediments to mitigate ecological stress.

Keywords:

Water Quality Index Soil Quality Index Structural Equation Modeling Urban Canal Ecological Risk Urban Sustainability

References

  1. Parvin, F.; Haque, M.M.; Tareq, S.M. Recent status of water quality in Bangladesh: A systematic review, meta-analysis and health risk assessment. Environ. Chall. 2022, 6, 100416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100416
  2. Hamad, S.; Fensham, R. Groundwater: An Important Resource of Urban Water Supply in Libya. In Water Resources of Libya; Zurqani, H.A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80920-0_3
  3. Monir, M.M.; Sarker, S.C.; Islam, M.N. Assessing the Changing Trends of Groundwater Level with Spatiotemporal Scale at the Northern Part of Bangladesh Integrating the MAKESENS and ARIMA Models. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2023, 10, 443–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01794-3
  4. Monir, M.M.; Sarker, S.C.; Sarker, S.K.; et al. Groundwater level fluctuations and associated factors in Rangpur district, Bangladesh, using modified Mann-Kendall and GIS-based AHP technique. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2023, 153, 1323–1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04541-x
  5. Balian, E.V.; Segers, H.; Martens, K.; et al. The Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment: An overview of the results. In Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment; Balian, E.V., Lévêque, C., Segers, H., et al., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; 198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8259-7_61
  6. Oluduro, A.O.; Aderiye, B.I. Impact of Moringa Seed Extract on the Physicochemical Properties of Surface and Underground Water. Int. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 1, 244–249.
  7. Wang, K.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, X.; et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment of the Hailar River basin based on ecosystem services in China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 147, 109795.
  8. Shi, Y.; Feng, C.C.; Yu, Q.; et al. Contradiction or coordination? The spatiotemporal relationship between landscape ecological risks and urbanization from coupling perspectives in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132557.
  9. Redin, C.G.; Valente, M.L.; Andriollo, D.D.; et al. Soil-landscape-vegetation relationships in grassland-forest boundaries, and possible applications in ecological restoration. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2023, 132, 104684.
  10. Liu, H.; Ma, W.; Qian, J.; et al. Effect of urbanization on the urban meteorology and air pollution in Hangzhou. J. Meteorol. Res. 2015, 29, 950–965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-015-5013-y
  11. Fan, P.; Chen, J.; Fung, C.; et al. Urbanization, economic development, and environmental changes in transitional economies in the global south: A case of Yangon. Ecol. Process. 2022, 11, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-022-00409-6
  12. Yoshida, F. Economic Analysis of Waste Management in Japan. In The Economics of Waste and Pollution Management in Japan; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67032-2_4
  13. Dessai, A.G. Waste Management. In Environment, Resources and Sustainable Tourism; Springer: Singapore, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1843-0_6
  14. Hridoy, M.A.A.M.; Shawkat, A.I.; Bordin, C.; et al. Advanced machine learning models for accurate water quality classification and WQI prediction: Implications for aquatic disease risk management. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 1008, 180965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180965
  15. Hridoy, M.A.A.M.; Bordin, C.; Masood, A.; et al. Predictive modelling of aquaculture water quality using IoT and advanced machine learning algorithms. Results Chem. 2025, 16, 102456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102456
  16. Panday, P.K. Urbanization and Urban Poverty in Bangladesh. In The Face of Urbanization and Urban Poverty in Bangladesh; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3332-7_3
  17. Barua, P.; Rahman, S.H. Urban Management in Bangladesh. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_147-1
  18. Mamun, S.A.; Islam, M.M.; Okely, A.D.; et al. Rapid and unplanned urbanization in the least developed districts of Bangladesh: A case study from Jamalpur using geospatial techniques. Discov. Sustain. 2022, 3, 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00110-w
  19. Haydar, M.; Hosan, S.; Rafi, A.H. Assessment of urban expansion susceptibility in major urban units of Bangladesh leveraging machine learning and geostatistical approach. J. Urban Manag. 2025, 14, 451–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2024.11.011
  20. Hoque, F.; Nipun, W. Urban Water Retention Measures: A Prospective Study on the Shamasundori Canal, Rangpur. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2024; pp. 76–107.
  21. Bassar, A.T.M.Z.; Habib, M.H. Environmental Crisis of Rangpur City Corporation: A Case Study in Radhakrishnapur and South Binnatari Village. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2017, 5, 12–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20170501.12
  22. Monir, M.M.; Rokonuzzaman, M.; Sarker, S.C.; et al. Spatiotemporal analysis and predicting rainfall trends in a tropical monsoon-dominated country using MAKESENS and machine learning techniques. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 13933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41132-2
  23. Akhter, S.; Rahman, M.M.; Monir, M.M. Flood susceptibility analysis to sustainable development using MCDA and support vector machine models by GIS in the selected area of the Teesta River floodplain, Bangladesh. J. HydroResearch 2024, 8, 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.10.004
  24. Tania, A.H.; Gazi, M.Y.; Mia, M.B. Evaluation of water quantity–quality, floodplain land use, and land surface temperature (LST) of Turag River in Bangladesh: an integrated approach of geospatial, field, and laboratory analyses. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04011-3
  25. Islam, M.R.; Das, N.G.; Barua, P.; et al. Environmental assessment of water and soil contamination in Rajakhali Canal of Karnaphuli River (Bangladesh) impacted by anthropogenic influences: A preliminary case study. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 997–1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0310-2
  26. Tietgen, H.; Walden, M. Physicochemical Properties. In Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Safety and Pharmacokinetic Assays; Vogel, H.G., Maas, J., Hock, F.J., et al., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25240-2_48
  27. Shaibur, M.R.; Howlader, M.; Ahmmed, I.; et al. Water quality index and health risk assessment for heavy metals in groundwater of Kashiani and Kotalipara upazila, Gopalganj, Bangladesh. Appl. Water Sci. 2024, 14, 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02169-4
  28. Chidiac, S.; El Najjar, P.; Ouaini, N.; et al. A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): History, models, attempts and perspectives. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 22, 349–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09650-7
  29. Das, A. Prediction of Urban Surface Water Quality Scenarios Using Water Quality Index (WQI), Multivariate Techniques, and Machine Learning (ML) Models in Water Resources, in Baitarani River Basin, Odisha: Potential Benefits and Associated Challenges. Earth Syst. Environ. 2025, 10, 606–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00623-0
  30. Gogoi, P.; Das, B.K.; Koushlesh, S.K.; et al. An integrative water quality index and multivariate modeling approach to assess surface water quality, trophic status and nutrient source apportionment in a large tropical reservoir, Hirakud–the longest earthen dam in Asia. Appl. Water Sci. 2025, 15, 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02517-y
  31. Kahsay, A.; Haile, M.; Gebresamuel, G.; et al. Developing soil quality indices to investigate degradation impacts of different land use types in Northern Ethiopia. Heliyon 2025, 11, e41185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41185
  32. Bhuyan, S.; Patgiri, D.K.; Medhi, B.K.; et al. Prediction of Soil Quality Index (SQI) and Its Minimum Dataset Indicators for Rice-Based Cropping Systems in the North Bank Plain Zone of Assam. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2024, 57, 1718–1729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229324600854
  33. Rust, R.H.; Adams, R.S.; Martin, W.P. Developing a Soil Quality Index. In Indicators of Environmental Quality; Thomas, W.A., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1972; 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2856-8_19
  34. Tenenhaus, A.; Tenenhaus, M.; Dijkstra, T.K. Structural equation modeling with factors and composites within the framework of the basic design. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 2025, in press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-025-00647-4
  35. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Fourth Edition Incorporating the First Addendum; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  36. Department of Environment (DoE), Bangladesh. Environmental Quality Standards for Bangladesh: Water Quality Standards; Department of Environment, Ministry of Environment and Forests: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1997.
  37. Fan, Y.; Chen, J.; Shirkey, G.; et al. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecol. Process. 2016, 5, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
  38. Hridoy, M.A.A.M.; Paul, P.B.; Hashar, M.N.; et al. Seasonal Variations in Water Quality and Microplastic Contamination in the Surma River, Bangladesh: Implications for Aquatic Health and Human Safety. Qual. Manag. 2025, 34, e70055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70055
  39. Hridoy, A.A.M.; Neogi, S.; Ujjaman, R.; et al. Water quality interactions and their synergistic effects on aquaculture performance in Bangladesh: A critical review. Results Chem. 2025, 16, 102306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102306
  40. Singh, K.P.; Saxena, A. Seasonal variations and correlation analysis of water quality parameters in the Chambal River, Rajasthan, India. Water Environ. Res. 2025, 97, e70035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70035
  41. Kim, M.; Jang, M.; Choong, C.E.; et al. Historical and future water quality risks driven by climate change: Strategic management and overcoming challenges. Water Res. 2025, 288, 124774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124774
  42. Luo, H.; Nong, X.; Xia, H.; et al. Integrating Water Quality Index (WQI) and Multivariate Statistics for Regional Surface Water Quality Evaluation: Key Parameter Identification and Human Health Risk Assessment. Water 2024, 16, 3412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233412
  43. Morales, B.K.C.; Forrest, J.; Castro, W.V.; et al. Geochemical, hydrochemical and remote sensing study of an Andean calcareous wetland in Huanta, Peru. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2025, 62, 102767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102767
  44. Monir, M.M.; Sarker, S.C.; Biswas, R.N.; et al. Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Regional Groundwater Flow Path Fluctuations in the Water-Stressed Northern Region of Bangladesh. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77617-x
  45. Hridoy, M.A.A.; Paul, P.B.; Masood, A. Monitoring flood-prone urban areas of Sylhet, Bangladesh through water quality remote sensing. Discov. Environ. 2025, 3, 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00322-7