Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Ethical Stewardship, Responsible Innovation, and Governance for Sustainable Food Systems

Intelligent Agriculture

Article

Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Ethical Stewardship, Responsible Innovation, and Governance for Sustainable Food Systems

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/ia.v1i2.1684
Volume 1 Issue 2 (2025): In Progress
Copyright (c) 2025 Sixbert Sangwa, Placide Mutabazi
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Intelligent Agriculture (IA) publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Intelligent Agriculture (IA) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Sixbert Sangwa

    Department of International Business and Trade, African leadership University, Kigali 0001, Rwanda
  • Placide Mutabazi

    Office of the Executive Chancellor, Open Christian University, California, CA 95811, USA

Received: 20 August 2025 | Revised: 30 September 2025 | Accepted: 5 October 2025 | Published Online: 27 October 2025

Agriculture’s “4.0” transition increasingly relies on artificial intelligence (AI), IoT sensing, robotics, and decision-support. This review synthesizes Q1/Q2 scholarship, multilateral policy, and national AI strategies to assess how AI is changing farm stewardship and what guardrails align innovation with equity and sustainability. Methods combine a systematic literature review, comparative policy analysis (FAO, OECD, India’s #AIForAll, Rwanda AI Policy), NLP-assisted meta-synthesis of agri-AI discourse, theological analysis of stewardship texts (Gen. 1:26–28, Gen. 2:15), and case illustrations (precision irrigation, UAV spraying, mobile advisory). Results show AI improves resource-use efficiency and foresight (e.g., precision irrigation; targeted drone spraying) while introducing risks of dependency, opacity, and data-extractive business models. We propose a multi-level governance scaffold—farmer-centric data rights, explainability thresholds, context-appropriate human oversight, and compute-energy budgeting—mapped to Responsible Innovation (AIRR) and Value-Sensitive Design. We translate stewardship into measurable design constraints (e.g., water-withdrawal and biodiversity “red lines,” local-language interfaces, offline capability). Policy implications include numbered-style impact assessments, mandatory farmer representation on regional AI councils, and adoption equity metrics. Properly governed, AI can act as a tool of care for households, communities, and creation rather than a driver of technocratic consolidation.

Keywords:

Precision Agriculture Internet of Things (IoT) Agricultural Robotics AI Governance Responsible Innovation Value‑sensitive Design Farmer Data Rights Sustainable Food Systems

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (UN-DESA), 2024. World Population Prospects 2024. United Nations. Available from: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (cited 12 August 2025).
  2. van Dijk, M., Morley, T., Rau, M.L., et al., 2021. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature Food. 2, 494–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9
  3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023. In: Lee, H., Romero, J. (eds.). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf (cited 14 August 2025).
  4. El Jarroudi, M., Kouadio, L., Delfosse, P., et al., 2024. Leveraging edge artificial intelligence for sustainable agriculture. Nature Sustainability. 7, 846–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01352-4
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2018. Food and Agriculture Projections to 2050. Available from: https://www.fao.org/global-perspectives-studies/food-agriculture-projections-to-2050/en/ (cited 19 August 2025).
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022. The State of Food and Agriculture 2022: Leveraging Automation in Agriculture for Transforming Agrifood Systems. FAO: Rome, Italy.
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2023. Digital Excellence in Agriculture Report: FAO–ITU Regional Contest on Good Practices Advancing Digital Agriculture in Europe and Central Asia. FAO: Budapest, Hungary. ITU: Geneva, Switzerland.
  8. Bolón-Canedo, V., Morán-Fernández, L., Cancela, B., et al., 2024. A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing. 599, 128096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128096
  9. Beisner, E.C., Cromartie, M., Derr, T.S., et al., 2023. A biblical perspective on environmental stewardship. Available from: https://www.acton.org/public-policy/environmental-stewardship/theology-e/biblical-perspective-environmental-stewardship (cited 18 August 2025).
  10. Zhao, C., Liu, B., Piao, S., et al., 2017. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114(35), 9326–9331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701762114
  11. Dang, P., Ciais, P., Peñuelas, J., et al., 2025. Mitigating the detrimental effects of climate warming on major staple crop production through adaptive nitrogen management: A meta-analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 367, 110524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110524
  12. Dara, R., Hazrati Fard, S.M., Kaur, J., 2022. Recommendations for ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in digital agriculture. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 5, Article 884192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.884192
  13. Ryan, M., 2023. The social and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence in agriculture: Mapping the agricultural AI literature. AI and Society. 38(6), 2473–2485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01377-9
  14. United Nations, 2024. Summit of the Future Outcome Documents: Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact, and Declaration on Future Generations (A/RES/79/1). Available from: https://www.idea.int/un-and-democracy/library/summit-future-outcome-documents-pact-future-global-digital-compact-and-declaration-future (cited 18 August 2025).
  15. Lederer, E.M., 2024. UN nations endorse a ‘Pact for the Future,’ and the body’s leader says it must be more than talk. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/un-pact-future-russia-challenges-climate-ai-accf4523e01c6604707189333de289ce (cited 18 August 2025).
  16. Gwagwa, A., Kazim, E., Kachidza, P., et al., 2021. Road map for research on responsible artificial intelligence for development (AI4D) in African countries: The case study of agriculture. Patterns. 2, Article 100381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100381
  17. Jouanjean, M.-A., Casalini, F., Wiseman, L., et al., 2020. Issues around data governance in the digital transformation of agriculture: The farmers’ perspective. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers. No.146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53ecf2ab-en
  18. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy. 42(9), 1568–1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  19. Friedman, B., Hendry, D.G., 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7585.001.0001
  20. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H. Jr., Borning, A., 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods (Technical Report UW-CSE-02-12-01). University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA. Available from: https://dada.cs.washington.edu/research/tr/2002/12/UW-CSE-02-12-01.pdf (cited 18 August 2025).
  21. van Mierlo, B., Beers, P., Hoes, A.C., 2020. Inclusion in responsible innovation: Revisiting the desirability of opening up. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 7(3), 361–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1780409
  22. Macnaghten, P., 2016. Responsible innovation and the reshaping of existing technological trajectories: The hard case of genetically modified crops. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 3(3), 282–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1255700
  23. Lee, S., 2025. Human values in tech design: Integrating ethics and empathy into human-computer interaction. Available from: https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/human-values-in-tech-design (cited 17 August 2025).
  24. Tiwari, R., 2023. Human values at the core: Unpacking value-sensitive design. Medium. Available from: https://medium.com/design-bootcamp/human-values-at-the-core-unpacking-value-sensitive-design-4eaedb49b299 (cited 18 August 2025).
  25. Mukherjee, S., Padaria, R.N., Burman, R.R., et al., 2025. Global trends in ICT-based extension and advisory services in agriculture: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9, Article 1430336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1430336
  26. Bauckham, R., 2010. Bible and Ecology: Rediscovering the Community of Creation. Baylor University Press: Waco, TX, USA. DOI: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58954
  27. Moo, D.J., Moo, J.A., 2018. Creation Care: A Biblical Theology of the Natural World. Zondervan Academic: Grand Rapids, MI, USA. Available from: https://www.christianbook.com/creation-care-biblical-theology-natural-world/douglas-moo/9780310293743/pd/293741 (cited 17 August 2025).
  28. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., et al., 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372, Article n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  29. Landrigan, P.J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N.J.R., et al., 2018. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet. 391(10119), 462–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
  30. Government of India, NITI Aayog, 2023. National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (#AIForAll). Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/National-Strategy-for-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf (cited 17 August 2025).
  31. Republic of Rwanda, 2023. The National AI Policy. Government of Rwanda: Kigali, Rwanda. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/countryplanningcycles/sites/default/files/public_file_rep/RWA_Rwanda_Artificial_Intelligence_Policy_2023.pdf (cited 18 August 2025).
  32. United Nations, Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (UN-ODET), 2024. Global Digital Compact. United Nations: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://www.un.org/digital-emerging-technologies/global-digital-compact (cited 17 August 2025).
  33. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 20(1), 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  34. Sevinc, N.T., 2025. UN chief urges immediate action on global AI governance. Available from: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/artificial-intelligence/un-chief-urges-immediate-action-on-global-ai-governance/3478581 (cited 17 August 2025).
  35. Řehůřek, R., Sojka, P., 2010. Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks. European Language Resources Association (ELRA): Valletta, Malta, 22 May 2010; pp. 45–50. Available from: http://is.muni.cz/publication/884893/en (cited 17 August 2025).
  36. Python Software Foundation, 2023. Python (Version 3.11). Available from: https://www.python.org/ (cited 18 August 2025).
  37. Olgers, G., 2023, June 26. A Christian perspective on environmental stewardship is at the heart of three new books by Dr. Steven Bouma-Prediger. Available from: https://hope.edu/news/2023/academics/a-christian-perspective-on-environmental-stewardship-is-at-the-heart-of-three-new-books-by-dr-steven-bouma-prediger.html (cited 19 August 2025).
  38. Penna-Firme, R., 2023. Protestant Christianity and the Bible as wisdom for Earth environmental stewardship. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae. 21(4), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2023.35
  39. Walla! Tech, 2025. “Irrigation Advisor” in AI? That already exists too. The Jerusalem Post. Available from: https://www.jpost.com/consumerism/article-851713 (cited 17 August 2025).
  40. Yang, T., 2025, May 30. Smart Earth: How AI is rewriting rural China. The World of Chinese. Available from: https://www.theworldofchinese.com/2025/05/smart-earth-how-ai-is-rewriting-rural-china/ (cited 19 August 2025).
  41. Oğuztürk, G.E., 2025. AI-driven irrigation systems for sustainable water management: A systematic review and meta-analytical insights. Smart Agricultural Technology. 11, 100982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100982
  42. Kataria, A., Min, H., 2025. AI-based smart irrigation systems for water conservation. In: Rani, S., Dutta, S., Rocha, Á., Cengiz, K. (eds.). AI and Data Analytics in Precision Agriculture for Sustainable Development. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 1215. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93087-4_9
  43. Del-Coco, M., Leo, M., Carcagnì, P., 2024. Machine learning for smart irrigation in agriculture: How far along are we? Information. 15(6), 306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060306
  44. Lakhiar, I.A., Yan, H., Zhang, C., et al., 2024. A review of precision irrigation water-saving technology under changing climate for enhancing water use efficiency, crop yield, and environmental footprints. Agriculture. 14(7), 1141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071141
  45. Mrisho, L., Mbilinyi, N., Ndalahwa, M., et al., 2020. Evaluation of the accuracy of a smartphone-based artificial intelligence system, PlantVillage Nuru, in diagnosing the viral diseases of cassava [Preprint]. bioRxiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.26.919449
  46. Mrisho, L., Mbilinyi, N.A., Ndalahwa, M., et al., 2020. Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Object Detection Model, PlantVillage Nuru, in Identifying the Foliar Symptoms of the Viral Diseases of Cassava–CMD and CBSD. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11, 590889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.590889
  47. Raj, M., Prahadeeswaran, M., 2025. Revolutionizing agriculture: A review of smart farming technologies for a sustainable future. Discover Applied Sciences. 7, 937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07561-6
  48. Dhakshayani, J., Surendiran, B., Jyothsna, J., 2023. Artificial intelligence in precision agriculture: A systematic review. In: Krishnan, S., Anand, A.J., Prasanth, N. (eds.). Predictive Analytics in Smart Agriculture, 1st ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 21–45. DOI: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003391302-3/artificial-intelligence-precision-agriculture-dhakshayani-surendiran-jyothsna (cited 17 August 2025).
  49. García-Munguía, A., Guerra-Ávila, P.L., Islas-Ojeda, E., et al., 2024. A review of drone technology and operation processes in agricultural crop spraying. Drones. 8(11), 674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8110674
  50. North Dakota State University Extension (NDSUE), 2025. Pesticide applications the drone way. Available from: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/sites/default/files/2025-02/Pesticide%20Applications%20the%20Drone%20Way.pdf (cited 17 August 2025).
  51. Borlaug, N.E., 1971. Mankind and civilization at another crossroad — Nobel Peace Prize Symposium Speech. Available from: https://www.azquotes.com/author/1686-Norman_Borlaug (cited 19 August 2025).
  52. Ashworth, B., 2025. The FTC suing John Deere is a tipping point for right-to-repair. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/ftc-sues-john-deere-over-repairability/ (cited 18 August 2025).
  53. Copa-Cogeca, 2020. EU Code of Conduct on Agricultural Data Sharing by Contractual Agreement. Available from: https://croplifeeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EU_Code_of_conduct_on_agricultural_data_sharing_by_contractual_agreement_2020_ENGLISH.pdf (cited 18 August 2025).
  54. Ostrom, E., 2015. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423936
  55. World Bank, 2021. ICTs for Agriculture in Africa. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/c2db4859-69f1-5db6-b994-a48cd7c644c5/download (cited 17 August 2025).

Copyright © UK Scientific Publishing Limited.