Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge: A Pathway toward Sustainable Energy Transition and Regional Development

Carbon Circularity

Review

Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge: A Pathway toward Sustainable Energy Transition and Regional Development

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/cc.v1i1.2046
Bail, A., Soares, T. M. M., & Flórez, A. A. G. (2025). Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge: A Pathway toward Sustainable Energy Transition and Regional Development. Carbon Circularity, 1(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.54963/cc.v1i1.2046
Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025): In Progress

Authors

  • Alesandro Bail

    Group of Materials Chemistry and Sustainable Technologies, Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina 86036-700, Brazil
  • Tatiana Micaela Miguel Soares

    Group of Materials Chemistry and Sustainable Technologies, Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina 86036-700, Brazil
  • Arley Andrés Gutiérrez Flórez

    Group of Materials Chemistry and Sustainable Technologies, Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina 86036-700, Brazi

Received: 9 November 2025 | Revised: 4 December 2025 | Accepted: 15 December 2025 | Published Online: 22 December 2025

The transition toward low-carbon energy systems requires technologies capable of converting residual biomass into value-added energy carriers. In this context, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of sewage sludge (SS) has emerged as a promising pathway for producing solid biofuels while addressing persistent challenges in waste management and sanitation. This study evaluates the technological basis, environmental implications, and regional development potential of SS-HTC within renewable energy and decarbonization strategies. HTC enables the direct processing of wet sewage sludge, avoiding energy-intensive drying steps and generating a carbon-rich hydrochar with reduced moisture content and improved fuel properties compared to the raw material. In addition to the solid fraction, the process produces a nutrient-rich liquid stream that can be further valorized, supporting circular resource management and integrated waste-to-energy systems. Although the estimated global production potential of SS-derived hydrochar (approximately 45 million dry tons) is insufficient to replace fossil coal on a large scale, its targeted use in selected industrial sectors can partially substitute mineral coal, contributing to greenhouse gas mitigation and incremental decarbonization. Beyond its technological advantages, SS-HTC offers opportunities for regional development, particularly in areas with expanding wastewater treatment infrastructure. Integrating HTC into sanitation systems enables localized biofuel production, reduces dependence on imported coal, and supports industrial diversification. The State of Paraná, Brazil, with a population of 11.5 million and sanitation coverage of approximately 81%, exemplifies a favorable context in which SS-HTC can enhance regional competitiveness while advancing environmental sustainability and socio-economic development within the broader low-carbon transition.

Keywords:

Circular Economy Waste-to-Energy Systems Energy Transition

References

  1. Briones, C.G., 2023. Singapore's Climate Action Ecosystem for Fostering Sustainable Development. Singapore Global Centre: Singapore. Available from: https://www.undp.org/policy-centre/singapore/stories/singapores-climate-action-ecosystem-fostering-sustainable-development (cited 8 November 2025).
  2. Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J., 2009. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management. 46(3/4), 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  3. Wang, C., Liu, H., Zeng, H., et al., 2025. Digital transformation and agricultural green economic resilience in China: A moderating and threshold analysis. Global NEST Journal. 27(8), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.07713
  4. Cheng, X., Fan, Z., Chen, M., et al., 2025. FDI Driving China's Green Economic Transformation: The “Bridge” Role of the Digital Economy. Global NEST Journal. 27(7), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.07659
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 2025. Carbon Dioxide—Earth Indicator. Available from: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/?intent=121 (cited 5 May 2025).
  6. Energy Institute, 2025. Statistical Review of World Energy. Available from: https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review (cited 24 April 2025).
  7. Rapier, R., 2020. Fossil fuels still supply 84 percent of world energy—And other eye openers from BP's annual review. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2020/06/20/bp-review-new-highs-in-global-energy-consumption-and-carbon-emissions-in-2019/ (cited 26 April 2025).
  8. Yin, I., 2024. Coal still accounted for nearly 60% of China's electricity supply in 2023: CEC. Available from: https://www.spglobal.com/energy/en/news-research/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec (cited 26 April 2025).
  9. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2024. Demand: Global coal demand saw another all-time high in 2023. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-mid-year-update-july-2024/demand (cited 26 April 2025).
  10. Belançon, M.P., 2021. Brazil electricity needs in 2030: Trends and challenges. Renewable Energy Focus. 36, 89–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2021.01.001
  11. Technology and Business Petroleum (T&B), 2024. Thermal power generation decreased by nearly 2% in the Brazilian electrical grid. Available from: https://www.tbpetroleum.com.br/noticia/thermal-power-generation-decreased-by-nearly-2-in-the-brazilian-electrical-grid/ (cited 27 April 2025).
  12. International Energy Agency (IEA), n.d. Coal supply. Available from: https://www.iea.org/countries/brazil/coal (cited 26 April 2025).
  13. Statista, n.d. Coal imports in Brazil from 2015 to 2023, by type (in 1000 metric tons). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1224249/coal-import-volume-type-brazil/ (cited 27 April 2025).
  14. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2024. Implementation of bioenergy in Norway—2024 update. Available from: https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CountryReport2024_Norway_final-.pdf (cited 27 April 2025).
  15. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2024. Overview. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/nor (cited 28 April 2025).
  16. Our World in Data, 2025. Coal consumption. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/coal-consumption-by-country-terawatt-hours-twh?tab=chart&country= (cited 27 April 2025).
  17. National Academies, n.d. America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation. Available from: https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/12091/chapter/1#xxii (cited 8 November 2025).
  18. Gasparotto, J., Da Boit Martinello, K., 2021. Coal as an energy source and its impacts on human health. Energy Geoscience. 2(2), 113–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2020.07.003
  19. Chowdhury, P., Mahi, N.A., Yeassin, R., et al., 2025. Biomass to biofuel: Impacts and mitigation of environmental, health, and socioeconomic challenges. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 25, 100889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100889
  20. United Nations (UN), 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: note/by the Secretary-General. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811?v=pdf (cited 27 April 2025).
  21. Sharma, T., Chauhan, P.S., Patel, M., et al., 2025. Carbon negative biofuels: A step ahead of carbon neutrality. Biofuels. 16(7), 754–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2025.2450156
  22. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2025. Fact Sheet: Use of Landfilling for Biosolids Management. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/biosolids/fact-sheet-use-landfilling-biosolids-management (cited 5 June 2025).
  23. Ferrentino, R., Langone, M., Fiori, L., et al., 2023. Full-Scale Sewage Sludge Reduction Technologies: A Review with a Focus on Energy Consumption. Water. 15(4), 615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040615
  24. Jones, E.R., van Vliet, M.T.H., Qadir, M., et al., 2021. Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth System Science Data. 13(2), 237–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021
  25. Mahata, S., Periyavaram, S.R., Akkupalli, N.K., et al., 2023. A review on Co-Hydrothermal carbonization of sludge: Effect of process parameters, reaction pathway, and pollutant transport. Journal of the Energy Institute. 110, 101340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2023.101340
  26. Ospina, G., Hassan, M.I., 2017. Wastewater Byproducts Thermal Integration. Energy Procedia. 142, 2740–2747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.219
  27. Adugna, D., 2023. Challenges of sanitation in developing counties—Evidenced from a study of fourteen towns, Ethiopia. Heliyon. 9(1), e12932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12932
  28. Canencio, K.N.P., Montaño, M.E.A., Giona, R.M., et al., 2024. Impact of key parameters on the hydrothermal carbonization process of sewage sludge: A systematic review. Environmental Engineering Research. 30(1), 240247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.247
  29. Almahbashi, N.M.Y., Kutty, S.R.M., Ayoub, M., et al., 2021. Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Sewage sludge based Activated Carbon. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 12(2), 1175–1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.026
  30. Li, L., Du, G., Yan, B., et al., 2023. Carbon Footprint Analysis of Sewage Sludge Thermochemical Conversion Technologies. Sustainability. 15(5), 4170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054170
  31. Ho, T.T.-T., Nadeem, A., Choe, K., 2024. A Review of Upscaling Hydrothermal Carbonization. Energies. 17(8), 1918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081918
  32. Karolinczak, B., Miłaszewski, R., Dąbrowski, W., 2020. Cost Optimization of Wastewater and Septage Treatment Process. Energies. 13(23), 6406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236406
  33. Tessini, C., Romero, R., Escobar, M., et al., 2016. Development of an Analytical Method for the Main Organic Compounds Derived from Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society. 61(1), 2837–2842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072016000100017
  34. Martins, V.M.S., Sante, L.G.G., Giona, R.M., et al., 2022. An inter-loop approach for hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge to produce hydrochars and their use as an adsorbent for iron removal from spent sulfuric acid. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 24(6), 1639–1652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02269-8
  35. Fan, J., Li, F., Fang, D., et al., 2022. Effects of hydrophobic coating on properties of hydrochar produced at different temperatures: Specific surface area and oxygen-containing functional groups. Bioresource Technology. 363, 127971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127971
  36. Fakudze, S., Chen, J., 2023. A critical review on co-hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and fossil-based feedstocks for cleaner solid fuel production: Synergistic effects and environmental benefits. Chemical Engineering Journal. 457, 141004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141004
  37. Shao, J., Yan, R., Chen, H., et al., 2010. Catalytic effect of metal oxides on pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Fuel Processing Technology. 91(9), 1113–1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.023
  38. Roslan, S.Z., Zainudin, S.F., Mohd Aris, A., et al., 2023. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge into Solid Biofuel: Influences of Process Conditions on the Energetic Properties of Hydrochar. Energies. 16(5), 2483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052483
  39. Wörner, M., Hornung, U., Karagöz, S., et al., 2025. Focus on hydrochars produced from hydrothermal liquefaction of beech wood, soda lignin and black liquor. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 83(2), 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-025-02214-2
  40. Breeze, P., 2015. Coal Types and the Production and Trade in Coal. In Coal-Fired Generation. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 9–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804006-5.00008-3
  41. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2023. Coal explained. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/coal/ (cited 29 April 2025).
  42. Zhi, Y., Xu, D., Jiang, G., et al., 2024. A review of hydrothermal carbonization of municipal sludge: Process conditions, physicochemical properties, methods coupling, energy balances and life cycle analyses. Fuel Processing Technology. 254, 107943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.107943
  43. Kahilu, G.M., Bada, S., Mulopo, J., 2022. Physicochemical, structural analysis of coal discards (and sewage sludge) (co)-HTC derived biochar for a sustainable carbon economy and evaluation of the liquid by-product. Scientific Reports. 12(1), 17532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22528-y
  44. Wang, L., Chang, Y., Li, A., 2019. Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 108, 423–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.011
  45. Hansen, L.J., Fendt, S., Spliethoff, H., 2022. Impact of hydrothermal carbonization on combustion properties of residual biomass. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 12(7), 2541–2552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00777-z
  46. Merzari, F., Goldfarb, J., Andreottola, G., et al., 2020. Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties. Energies. 13(11), 2890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112890
  47. Zhang, H., Xue, G., Chen, H., et al., 2021. Revealing the heating value characteristics of sludge-based hydrochar in hydrothermal process: From perspective of hydrolysate. Water Research. 198, 117170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117170
  48. Czerwińska, K., Śliz, M., Wilk, M., 2022. Hydrothermal carbonization process: Fundamentals, main parameter characteristics and possible applications including an effective method of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation in sewage sludge. A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 154, 111873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111873
  49. Climate and Society Institute (CSI), 2022. Brazil has the highest emission of greenhouse gases for the last 20 years. Available from: https://climaesociedade.org/en/brazil-has-the-highest-emission-of-greenhouse-gases-for-the-last-20-years/ (cited 2 May 2025).
  50. Feng, J., Burke, I.T., Chen, X., et al., 2023. Assessing metal contamination and speciation in sewage sludge: implications for soil application and environmental risk. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 22(4), 1037–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09675-y
  51. Gao, S., Li, M.-Y., Duan, M.-S., et al., 2019. International carbon markets under the Paris Agreement: Basic form and development prospects. Advances in Climate Change Research. 10(1), 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2019.03.001
  52. Lamers, P., Hoefnagels, R., Junginger, M., et al., 2015. Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: an assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North‐West Europe under different sustainability constraints. GCB Bioenergy. 7(4), 618–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12162
  53. Ige, O.E., Kabeya, M., 2025. Decarbonizing the Cement Industry: Technological, Economic, and Policy Barriers to CO2 Mitigation Adoption. Clean Technologies. 7(4), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040085
  54. Yadav, A., Mahalik, M.K., 2024. Does renewable energy development reduce energy import dependency in emerging economies? Evidence from CS-ARDL and panel causality approach. Energy Economics. 131, 107356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107356
  55. Chen, H., He, L., Chen, J., et al., 2019. Impacts of Clean Energy Substitution for Polluting Fossil-Fuels in Terminal Energy Consumption on the Economy and Environment in China. Sustainability. 11(22), 6419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226419
  56. da Silva, G.H.R., Nascimento, A., Baum, C.D., et al., 2024. Renewable Energy Potentials and Roadmap in Brazil, Austria, and Germany. Energies. 17(6), 1482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061482
  57. Government of Paraná, 2024. With works by Sanepar, Paraná gets closer to the goal of universal sanitation. Government of Paraná: Paraná, Brazil. (in Portuguese)
  58. Paraná Sanitation Company, 2022. Report of Sustainability 2021. Available from: https://ri.sanepar.com.br/docs/Relatorio-de-Sustentabilidade-Sanepar-2022-05-27-HmD7jfpW.pdf (cited 8 November 2025). (in Portuguese)
  59. Gherghel, A., Teodosiu, C., De Gisi, S., 2019. A review on wastewater sludge valorisation and its challenges in the context of circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 228, 244–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.240
  60. de Oliveira, M.V., Kanaan, A.F., Voll, F.A.P., et al., 2026. Hydrothermal carbonization of digestate from sewage sludge: Evaluating the impact of process parameters in hydrochar yield and characterization. Fuel. 405, 136672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136672
  61. Mahata, S., Majee, P., Periyavaram, S.R., et al., 2025. Optimization of energy recovery through the catalytic Co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and lignocellulose biomass. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 15(24), 31559–31574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06874-1
  62. Wilk, M., Magdziarz, A., Jayaraman, K., et al., 2019. Hydrothermal carbonization characteristics of sewage sludge and lignocellulosic biomass. A comparative study. Biomass and Bioenergy. 120, 166–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.016
  63. Aragón-Briceño, C.I., Grasham, O., Ross, A.B., et al., 2020. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage digestate at wastewater treatment works: Influence of solid loading on characteristics of hydrochar, process water and plant energetics. Renewable Energy. 157, 959–973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.021
  64. Grobelak, A., Spinosa, L., 2023. Sustainable/integrated/sewage sludge management. In Sustainable and Circular Management of Resources and Waste towards a Green Deal. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 163–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95278-1.00016-4
  65. Zhang, J., Liang, Z., Matsumoto, T., et al., 2022. Environmental and Economic Implication of Implementation Scale of Sewage Sludge Recycling Systems Considering Carbon Trading Price. Sustainability. 14(14), 8684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148684
  66. Liu, T., Liu, Z., Zheng, Q., et al., 2018. Effect of hydrothermal carbonization on migration and environmental risk of heavy metals in sewage sludge during pyrolysis. Bioresource Technology. 247, 282–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.090
  67. Wang, H., Yang, Z., Li, X., et al., 2020. Distribution and transformation behaviors of heavy metals and phosphorus during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(14), 17109–17122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08098-4
  68. Li, C., Li, J., Xie, S., et al., 2022. Enhancement of heavy metal immobilization in sewage sludge biochar by combining alkaline hydrothermal treatment and pyrolysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 369, 133325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133325
  69. Cardarelli, A., Barbanera, M., 2023. Substitution of Fossil Coal with Hydrochar from Agricultural Waste in the Electric Arc Furnace Steel Industry: A Comprehensive Life Cycle Analysis. Energies. 16(15), 5686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155686
  70. Khoshbouy, R., Takahashi, F., Yoshikawa, K., 2019. Preparation of high surface area sludge-based activated hydrochar via hydrothermal carbonization and application in the removal of basic dye. Environmental Research. 175, 457–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.002
  71. Cao, X., Sun, S., Sun, R., 2017. Application of biochar-based catalysts in biomass upgrading: A review. RSC Advances. 7(77), 48793–48805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA09307A
  72. Villamil, J.A., Mohedano, A.F., San Martín, J., et al., 2020. Anaerobic co-digestion of the process water from waste activated sludge hydrothermally treated with primary sewage sludge. A new approach for sewage sludge management. Renewable Energy. 146, 435–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.138
  73. Government of the state of Paraná, 2024. State establishes Governance Committee to promote biogas and hydrogen supply chains. Available from: https://www.parana.pr.gov.br/aen/Noticia/Estado-institui-Comite-de-Governanca-para-incentivar-cadeias-de-biogas-e-hidrogenio (cited 7 November 2025).(in Portuguese)