Carbon Circularity

Articles

Biochar vs. Hydrochar in Cementitious Materials: A Comparative Review of Properties, Performance, and Circular-Economy Trade-offs

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/cc.v1i1.1646
Mendes Santos, M. (2025). Biochar vs. Hydrochar in Cementitious Materials: A Comparative Review of Properties, Performance, and Circular-Economy Trade-offs. Carbon Circularity, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.54963/cc.v1i1.1646
Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025): In Progress
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Mendes Santos
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Michael Mendes Santos

    Centre of Materials and Civil Engineering for Sustainability (C–MADE/UBI), University of Beira Interior (UBI), 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal

Received: 2 June 2025 | Revised: 22 July 2025 | Accepted: 30 July 2025 | Published Online: 7 August 2025

The environmental burden of cement production, responsible for nearly 7% of global CO₂ emissions, has intensified the search for low-carbon, resource-efficient alternatives in the construction sector. Biochar, a carbon-rich byproduct derived from the thermochemical conversion of agricultural and urban biomass, has emerged as a multifunctional additive in both cementitious and non-cementitious systems. Its high porosity, alkaline pH, and stable carbon content enable improvements in hydration, mechanical strength, thermal insulation, and durability, while simultaneously offering long-term carbon sequestration. This review critically evaluates the morphological, physicochemical, and functional characteristics of biochar and its effects on cement-based materials, drawing from over 127 published studies. It also highlights the potential of hydrochar, produced through hydrothermal carbonization, as a complementary material in low-carbon construction systems, although research in this area remains limited. Key parameters such as feedstock type, pyrolysis conditions, particle size, and dosage are identified as major factors influencing performance. Beyond technical performance, the use of biochar aligns with circular economy principles by valorizing organic waste streams, reducing reliance on virgin cement and aggregate resources, and enabling industrial symbiosis. Emerging applications in thermal and acoustic panels, multifunctional coatings, and lightweight composites further reinforce its versatility. However, challenges remain regarding workability, performance variability, scalability, and the lack of standardized production and application protocols. Future directions include the standardization of biochar characteristics, large-scale durability validation, integration with life cycle assessment (LCA), development of technical guidelines, and cost–benefit analyses. Overall, biochar and hydrochar represent viable strategies to decarbonize the construction sector and promote sustainable material flows in alignment with global climate and resource-efficiency goals.

Keywords:

Biochar Hydrochar Waste Valorization Cementitious Materials Building Materials Circular Economy

References

  1. Spangenberg, J.H., Pfahl, S., Deller, K., 2002. Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: Lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological Indicators. 2, 61–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00050-X
  2. United Nations (UN), 2017. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (cited 7 January 2025).
  3. European Commission, 2019. COM(2019) 640 - The European Green Deal. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 (cited 7 January 2025).
  4. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2018. Technology Roadmap - Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry (cited 7 January 2025).
  5. Fořt, J., Černý, R., 2020. Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios. Waste Management. 118, 510–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.004
  6. Maljaee, H., Madadi, R., Paiva, H., et al., 2021. Incorporation of biochar in cementitious materials: A roadmap of biochar selection. Construction and Building Materials. 283, 122757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122757
  7. Gupta, S., Kua, H.W., Koh, H.J., 2018. Application of biochar from food and wood waste as green admixture for cement mortar. Science of the Total Environment. 619–620, 419–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.044
  8. Al-Wabel, M.I., Ahmad, M., Usman, A.R.A., et al., 2020. Advances in pyrolytic technologies with improved carbon capture and storage to combat climate change. In Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 535–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_21
  9. Santos, M.M., Marques Sierra, A.L., Amado-Fierro, Á., et al., 2023. Reducing cement consumption in mortars by waste-derived hydrochars. Journal of Building Engineering. 75, 106987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2023.106987
  10. Xu, Q., Chen, Z., Wu, Z., et al., 2019. Novel lanthanum doped biochars derived from lignocellulosic wastes for efficient phosphate removal and regeneration. Bioresource Technology. 289, 121600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121600
  11. Amado-Fierro, Á., Marques Sierra, A.L., Fernandez-Gonzalez, A., et al., 2025. Approach to hydrochar as a partial cement substitute in mortars. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 22, e04829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2025.E04829
  12. Yang, S., Wi, S., Lee, J., et al., 2019. Biochar–red clay composites for energy efficiency as eco-friendly building materials: Thermal and mechanical performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 373, 844–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.079
  13. Schmidt, H.-P., 2012. 55 Uses of Biochar. Ithaka Journal. 286–289. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257939693_55_Uses_of_Biochar (cited 1 February 2025).
  14. Carpenter, A., 2012. CO₂ abatement in the iron and steel industry. Available from: https://usea.org/sites/default/files/012012_CO2%20abatement%20in%20the%20iron%20and%20steel%20industry_ccc193.pdf (cited 14 February 2025).
  15. Tangstad, M., Beukes, J.P., Steenkamp, J., et al., 2018. Coal-based reducing agents in ferroalloys and silicon production. New Trends in Coal Conversion: Combustion, Gasification, Emissions, and Coking. 405–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102201-6.00014-5
  16. Hanrot, F., Sert, D., Delinchant, J., et al., 2009. CO₂ mitigation for steelmaking using charcoal and plastics wastes as reducing agents and secondary raw materials. In Proceedings of the 1st Spanish National Conference on Advances in Materials Recycling and Eco–Energy, Madrid, Spain, 12–13 November 2009.
  17. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), 2020. Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. European Biochar Foundation: Arbaz, Switzerland.
  18. Karaosmanoğlu, F., Işigigür-Ergüdenler, A., Sever, A., 2000. Biochar from the straw–stalk of rapeseed plant. Energy and Fuels. 14, 336–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9901138
  19. Woods, W.I., Falcão, N.P.S., Teixeira, W.G., 2006. Biochar trials aim to enrich soil for smallholders. Nature. 443, 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/443144b
  20. Ogawa, M., Okimori, Y., Takahashi, F., 2006. Carbon sequestration by carbonization of biomass and forestation: Three case studies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 11, 429–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9007-4
  21. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2019. Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into a Resource. Available from: https://www.build-a-biogas-plant.com/PDF/WasteAgriculturalBiomassEST_Compendium.pdf (cited 10 January 2025).
  22. Anwar, Z., Gulfraz, M., Irshad, M., 2014. Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass: A key to unlock the future bio-energy: A brief review. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 7, 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.02.003
  23. Suopajärvi, H., Umeki, K., Mousa, E., et al., 2018. Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO₂ steel production technologies. Applied Energy. 213, 384–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.060
  24. Isah, S., Ozbay, G., 2020. Valorization of food loss and wastes: Feedstocks for biofuels and valuable chemicals. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00082
  25. Uddin, M.N., Techato, K., Taweekun, J., et al., 2018. An overview of recent developments in biomass pyrolysis technologies. Energies. 11, 3115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113115
  26. Bridgwater, A.V., 1995. The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. Fuel. 74, 631–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)00001-L
  27. Olowu, T.O., Sundararajan, A., Moghaddami, M., et al., 2018. Bio-economy and the sustainability of the agriculture and food system: Opportunities and policy challenges. CIRED – Open Access Proceedings Journal. 1–104. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/bio-economy-and-the-sustainability-of-the-agriculture-and-food-system_d0ad045d-en.html
  28. Qi, C., Zhang, F., Mu, J., et al., 2020. Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of hollow wood composites filled with phase-change material. Journal of Cleaner Production. 256, 120373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120373
  29. Ahmad, S., Khushnood, R.A., Jagdale, P., et al., 2015. High performance self-consolidating cementitious composites by using micro carbonized bamboo particles. Materials and Design. 76, 223–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.048
  30. Jahirul, M.I., Rasul, M.G., Chowdhury, A.A., et al., 2012. Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis – A technological review. Energies. 5, 4952–5001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en5124952
  31. Bergman, P., Boersma, A., Kiel, J., et al., 2005. Torrefaction for entrained-flow gasification of biomass. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection; pp. 78–82. Available from: https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/3167898/638046.pdf
  32. Šál, J., Nováková, P., 2019. Utilization of fermentation residues in the production of a brick block. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Prague, Czech Republic, 2–4 July 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012034
  33. Zanoni, G.P., 2018. Acoustical characterization of double porosity materials using mineral wools. University of Campinas: Campinas, Brazil. (in Portuguese).
  34. Cosentino, I., Restuccia, L., Ferro, G.A., et al., 2019. Type of materials, pyrolysis conditions, carbon content and size dimensions: The parameters that influence the mechanical properties of biochar cement-based composites. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 103, 102261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102261
  35. Praneeth, S., Saavedra, L., Zeng, M., et al., 2021. Biochar admixtured lightweight, porous and tougher cement mortars: Mechanical, durability and micro computed tomography analysis. Science of the Total Environment. 750, 142327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.142327
  36. Zahed, M.A., Salehi, S., Madadi, R., et al., 2021. Biochar as a sustainable product for remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 4, 100055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRGSC.2021.100055
  37. Pawar, A., Panwar, N.L., 2022. A comparative study on morphology, composition, kinetics, thermal behaviour and thermodynamic parameters of Prosopis juliflora and its biochar derived from vacuum pyrolysis. Bioresource Technology Reports. 18, 101053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2022.101053
  38. Mo, L., Fang, J., Huang, B., et al., 2019. Combined effects of biochar and MgO expansive additive on autogenous shrinkage, internal relative humidity and compressive strength of cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials. 229, 116877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.116877
  39. Shaaban, A., Se, S.M., Mitan, N.M.M., et al., 2013. Characterization of biochar derived from rubber wood sawdust through slow pyrolysis on surface porosities and functional groups. Procedia Engineering. 68, 365–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.12.193
  40. Gupta, S., Kua, H.W., 2019. Carbonaceous micro-filler for cement: Effect of particle size and dosage of biochar on fresh and hardened properties of cement mortar. Science of the Total Environment. 662, 952–962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.269
  41. Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Li, M., et al., 2024. Durability and micromechanical properties of biochar in biochar-cement composites under marine environment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 450, 141842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.141842
  42. Wang, Y.S., Wang, X.Y., 2023. Multi-characterizations of the hydration, microstructure, and mechanical properties of a biochar–limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) mixture. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 24, 3691–3703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2023.04.033
  43. Zhang, J., Su, Y., Zhang, C., et al., 2024. Alterations in rheo-viscoelastic properties of cement composites with biochar incorporation as bio-based admixture. Construction and Building Materials. 439, 137358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.137358
  44. Li, Y., Lin, H., Li, Y., et al., 2024. Carbon sequestration of silica-rich biochar in cement accompanied by the pozzolanic effect. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 12(37). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03831
  45. Sirico, A., Bernardi, P., Belletti, B., et al., 2020. Mechanical characterization of cement-based materials containing biochar from gasification. Construction and Building Materials. 246, 118490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118490
  46. Haque, M.I., Khan, R.I., Ashraf, W., et al., 2021. Production of sustainable, low-permeable and self-sensing cementitious composites using biochar. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 28, e00279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUSMAT.2021.E00279
  47. Goulouti, K., Padey, P., Galimshina, A., et al., 2020. Uncertainty of building elements’ service lives in building LCA & LCC: What matters? Building and Environment. 183, 106904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2020.106904
  48. Habert, G., Miller, S.A., John, V.M., et al., 2020. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 1, 559–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3
  49. Liang, C., Pan, B., Ma, Z., et al., 2020. Utilization of CO2 curing to enhance the properties of recycled aggregate and prepared concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Composites. 105, 103446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103446
  50. Barbhuiya, S., Bhusan Das, B., Kanavaris, F., 2024. Biochar-concrete: A comprehensive review of properties, production and sustainability. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 20, e02859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2024.E02859
  51. Adeyanju, E., Okeke, C.A., 2019. Exposure effect to cement dust pollution: a mini review. SN Applied Sciences. 1, 1572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1583-0
  52. Schneider, M., 2015. Process technology for efficient and sustainable cement production. Cement and Concrete Research. 78, 14–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.014
  53. Ballantine, K.A., Lehmann, J., Schneider, R.L., et al., 2015. Trade-offs between soil-based functions in wetlands restored with soil amendments of differing lability. Ecological Applications. 25, 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1409.1
  54. Georgiades, M., Shah, I.H., Steubing, B., et al., 2023. Prospective life cycle assessment of European cement production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 194, 106998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106998
  55. Czigler, T., Reiter, S., Schulze, P., et al., 2020. Laying the foundation for a zero-carbon cement industry. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/chemicals/our-insights/laying-the-foundation-for-zero-carbon-cement# (cited 22 January 2025).
  56. Muthukrishnan, S., Gupta, S., Kua, H.W.H.W., 2019. Application of rice husk biochar and thermally treated low silica rice husk ash to improve physical properties of cement mortar. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 104, 102376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102376
  57. Phillips, C.L., Meyer, K.M., Trippe, K.M., 2020. Is biochar applied as surface mulch beneficial for grassland restoration? Geoderma. 375, 114457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114457
  58. Zheng, J., Aziz, T., Fan, H., et al., 2021. Synergistic impact of cellulose nanocrystals with multiple resins on thermal and mechanical behavior. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. 235, 1247–1262.
  59. Gupta, S., HarnWei, K., SzeDai, P., 2018. Biochar-mortar composite: manufacturing, evaluation of physical properties and economic viability. Construction and Building Materials. 167, 874–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.104
  60. Antiohos, S.K., Papadakis, V.G., Tsimas, S., 2014. Rice husk ash (RHA) effectiveness in cement and concrete as a function of reactive silica and fineness. Cement and Concrete Research. 61–62, 20–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.04.001
  61. Gupta, S., Kua, H.W., 2020. Application of rice husk biochar as filler in cenosphere modified mortar: Preparation, characterization and performance under elevated temperature. Construction and Building Materials. 253, 119083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119083
  62. Rodríguez De Sensale, G., 2010. Effect of rice-husk ash on durability of cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Composites. 32, 718–725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2010.07.008
  63. Potty, N.S., Vallyutham, K., Yusoff, M.F., et al., 2014. Properties of Rice Husk Ash (RHA and MIRHA) Mortars. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 7, 3872–3882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19026/RJASET.7.745
  64. Selvaranjan, K., Gamage, J.C.P.H., De Silva, G.I.P., et al., 2021. Development of sustainable mortar using waste rice husk ash from rice mill plant: Physical and thermal properties. Journal of Building Engineering. 43, 102614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.102614
  65. Subandi, Nasrulah, T., Arha, A.A., et al., 2019. Effect of addition of rice husk charcoal on concrete compressive strength. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 8, 4951–4955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F9251.088619
  66. Chao-Lung, H., Le Anh-Tuan, B., Chun-Tsun, C., 2011. Effect of rice husk ash on the strength and durability characteristics of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 25, 3768–3772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2011.04.009
  67. Cordeiro, G.C., Toledo Filho, R.D., Fairbairn, E.D.M.R., 2009. Use of ultrafine rice husk ash with high-carbon content as pozzolan in high performance concrete. Materials and Structures. 42, 983–992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9437-z
  68. Babako, M., Apeh, J., 2020. Setting time and standard consistency of Portland cement binders blended with rice husk ash, calcium carbide and metakaolin admixtures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 805, 012031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/805/1/012031
  69. Riyap, H.I., Bewa, C.N., Banenzoué, C., et al., 2019. Microstructure and mechanical, physical and structural properties of sustainable lightweight metakaolin-based geopolymer cements and mortars employing rice husk. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 7, 199–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2019.1606140
  70. Ahmadi, S.H., Ghasemi, H., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2020. Rice husk biochar influences runoff features, soil loss, and hydrological behavior of a loamy soil in a series of successive simulated rainfall events. Catena. 192, 104587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATENA.2020.104587
  71. Ofuyatan, O., Olowofoyeku, A., Adaramaja, G., et al., 2020. Potential use of coconut stem as reinforcement in concrete slab. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 13, e00355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00355
  72. Jeon, J., Park, J.H., Wi, S., et al., 2019. Characterization of biocomposite using coconut oil impregnated biochar as latent heat storage insulation. Chemosphere. 236, 124269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.239
  73. Pituya, P., Sriburi, T., Wijitkosum, S., 2017. Properties of biochar prepared from acacia wood and coconut shell for soil amendment. Engineering Journal. 21, 63–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.3.63
  74. Gupta, S., Krishnan, P., Kashani, A., et al., 2020. Application of biochar from coconut and wood waste to reduce shrinkage and improve physical properties of silica fume-cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials. 262, 120688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120688
  75. Silva, L.H.P., Tamashiro, J.R., Guedes de Paiva, F.F., et al., 2021. Bamboo leaf ash for use as mineral addition with Portland cement. Journal of Building Engineering. 42, 102769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.102769
  76. Ren, Q., Zeng, Z., Jiang, Z., et al., 2019. Incorporation of bamboo charcoal for cement-based humidity adsorption material. Construction and Building Materials. 215, 244–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.173
  77. Brito, F.M.S., Bortoletto Júnior, G., Paes, J.B., et al., 2020. Technological characterization of particleboards made with sugarcane bagasse and bamboo culm particles. Construction and Building Materials. 262, 120501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.120501
  78. Villar-Cociña, E., Morales, E.V., Santos, S.F., et al., 2011. Pozzolanic behavior of bamboo leaf ash: Characterization and determination of the kinetic parameters. Cement and Concrete Composites. 33, 68–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.003
  79. Rodier, L., Bilba, K., Onésippe, C., et al., 2017. Study of pozzolanic activity of bamboo stem ashes for use as partial replacement of cement. Materials and Structures. 50, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0958-6
  80. Rodier, L., Villar-Cociña, E., Ballesteros, J.M., et al., 2019. Potential use of sugarcane bagasse and bamboo leaf ashes for elaboration of green cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production. 231, 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.05.208
  81. Payá, J., Monzó, J., Borrachero, M.V.V., et al., 2002. Sugar-cane bagasse ash (SCBA): Studies on its properties for reusing in concrete production. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 77, 321–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.549
  82. Mehrotra, S.O., Masood, I., 1992. Pozzolanic behaviour of bagasse ash: A derivative of sugar cane distillation, bagasse ash, has properties that might be suitable for use in building materials. Building Research & Information. 20, 299–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219208727228
  83. Han, T., 2020. Application of peanut biochar as admixture in cement mortar. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 531, 012061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/531/1/012061
  84. Gupta, S., Kashani, A., 2021. Utilization of biochar from unwashed peanut shell in cementitious building materials – Effect on early age properties and environmental benefits. Fuel Processing Technology. 218, 106841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106841
  85. Huang, Y.F., Lo, S.L., 2018. Utilization of rice hull and straw. Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811508-4.00019-8
  86. Liuzzi, S., Rubino, C., Martellotta, F., et al., 2020. Characterization of biomass-based materials for building applications: The case of straw and olive tree waste. Industrial Crops and Products. 147, 112229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112229
  87. Aller, D.M., Archontoulis, S.V., Zhang, W., et al., 2018. Long term biochar effects on corn yield, soil quality and profitability in the US Midwest. Field Crops Research. 227, 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.012
  88. Carević, I., Baričević, A., Štirmer, N., et al., 2020. Correlation between physical and chemical properties of wood biomass ash and cement composites performances. Construction and Building Materials. 256, 119450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119450
  89. Serdar, M., Carević, I., Nardin, M., et al., 2020. Corrosion behaviour of steel in mortar with wood biomass ash. Materials and Corrosion. 71, 767–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.202011546
  90. Zou, S., Li, H., Wang, S., et al., 2020. Experimental research on an innovative sawdust biomass-based insulation material for buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production. 260, 121029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121029
  91. Tan, K., Qin, Y., Du, T., et al., 2021. Biochar from waste biomass as hygroscopic filler for pervious concrete to improve evaporative cooling performance. Construction and Building Materials. 287, 123078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123078
  92. Gupta, S., Tulliani, J.-M., Kua, H.W., 2022. Carbonaceous admixtures in cementitious building materials: Effect of particle size blending on rheology, packing, early age properties and processing energy demand. Science of the Total Environment. 807, 150884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150884
  93. Schmidt, H., 2013. The use of biochar as building material – cities as carbon sinks. Ithaka-Journal. 450–454. Available from: www.ithaka-journal.net/en/ct/149
  94. Woolf, D., Amonette, J.E., Street-Perrott, F.A., et al., 2010. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications. 1, 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053
  95. Tammeorg, P., Bastos, A.C., Jeffery, S., et al., 2017. Biochars in soils: towards the required level of scientific understanding. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management. 25, 192–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2016.1239582
  96. Praneeth, S., Guo, R., Wang, T., et al., 2020. Accelerated carbonation of biochar reinforced cement-fly ash composites: Enhancing and sequestering CO2 in building materials. Construction and Building Materials. 244, 118363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118363
  97. Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., et al., 2022. Biochar-augmented carbon-negative concrete. Chemical Engineering Journal. 431, 133946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.133946
  98. Gupta, S., Kua, H.W., Pang, S.D., 2020. Effect of biochar on mechanical and permeability properties of concrete exposed to elevated temperature. Construction and Building Materials. 234, 117338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.117338
  99. Park, J.H., Kim, Y.U., Jeon, J., et al., 2021. Analysis of biochar-mortar composite as a humidity control material to improve the building energy and hygrothermal performance. Science of the Total Environment. 775, 145552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145552
  100. De Carvalho Gomes, S., Zhou, J.L., Zeng, X., et al., 2022. Water treatment sludge conversion to biochar as cementitious material in cement composite. Journal of Environmental Management. 306, 114463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114463
  101. Zhang, Y., Maierdan, Y., Guo, T., et al., 2022. Biochar as carbon sequestration material combines with sewage sludge incineration ash to prepare lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 343, 128116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128116
  102. Asadi Zeidabadi, Z., Bakhtiari, S., Abbaslou, H., et al., 2018. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of biochar from agricultural waste biomass for use in building materials. Construction and Building Materials. 181, 301–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.05.271
  103. Neve, S., Du, J., Barhemat, R., et al., 2023. Valorization of Vetiver Root Biochar in Eco-Friendly Reinforced Concrete: Mechanical, Economic, and Environmental Performance. Materials. 16, 2522.
  104. Ofori-Boadu, A.N., Bryant, D.A., Bock-Hyeng, C., et al., 2022. Physiochemical characterization of agricultural waste biochars for partial cement replacement. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 40, 569–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2020-0026
  105. Jia, Y., Li, H., He, X., et al., 2023. Effect of biochar from municipal solid waste on mechanical and freeze–thaw properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 368, 130374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.130374
  106. Kang, Z., Zhang, J., Li, N., et al., 2024. Utilization of biochar as a green additive in supersulfated cement: Properties, mechanisms, and environmental impacts. Construction and Building Materials. 445, 137923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.137923
  107. Li, Z., Xue, W., Zhou, W., 2023. Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Different Carya Cathayensis Peel Biochar Additions. Sustainability. 15, 64874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064874
  108. Kalderis, D., Anastasiou, E., Petrakis, E., et al., 2024. Utilization of biochar from olive tree pruning as additive to cement mortars. Journal of Cleaner Production. 469, 143137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.143137
  109. Boumaaza, M., Belaadi, A., Alshahrani, H., et al., 2023. Environmentally mortar development using Washingtonia/biochar waste hybrid: mechanical and thermal properties. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 14, 30125–30148.
  110. Jeon, J., Kim, H.-I.H., Park, J.H.J.H., et al., 2021. Evaluation of thermal properties and acetaldehyde adsorption performance of sustainable composites using waste wood and biochar. Environmental Research. 196, 110910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.110910
  111. Ishii, T., Kadoya, K., 1994. Effects of charcoal as a soil conditioner on citrus growth and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal development. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science. 63, 529–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.63.529
  112. Gupta, S., Kua, H.W., Low, C.Y., 2018. Use of biochar as carbon sequestering additive in cement mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites. 87, 110–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.009
  113. Cuthbertson, D., Berardi, U., Briens, C., et al., 2019. Biochar from residual biomass as a concrete filler for improved thermal and acoustic properties. Biomass and Bioenergy. 120, 77–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.007
  114. Wang, L., Chen, L., Tsang, D.C.W., et al., 2019. The roles of biochar as green admixture for sediment-based construction products. Cement and Concrete Composites. 104, 103348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103348
  115. Kamaluddin, S., Kurniawan, D., Bakar, M.S.A., et al., 2020. Biochar as a conducting filler to enhance electrical conduction monitoring for concrete structures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.847.149
  116. Ahmad, M.R.M.R., Chen, B., Duan, H., 2020. Improvement effect of pyrolyzed agro-food biochar on the properties of magnesium phosphate cement. Science of the Total Environment. 718, 137422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137422
  117. Sirico, A., Bernardi, P., Belletti, B., et al., 2020. Biochar-based cement pastes and mortars with enhanced mechanical properties. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale. 14, 297–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.54.21
  118. Falliano, D., De Domenico, D., Sciarrone, A., et al., 2020. Influence of biochar additions on the fracture behavior of foamed concrete. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale. 14, 189–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.15
  119. Neogi, S., Sharma, V., Khan, N., et al., 2022. Sustainable biochar: A facile strategy for soil and environmental restoration, energy generation, mitigation of global climate change and circular bioeconomy. Chemosphere. 293, 133474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133474
  120. Kamini, G.P., Tee, K.F., Gimbun, J., et al., 2023. Biochar in cementitious material—A review on physical, chemical, mechanical, and durability properties. AIMS Materials Science. 10, 405–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2023022
  121. Barbhuiya, S., Kanavaris, F., Das, B.B., et al., 2024. Decarbonising cement and concrete production: Strategies, challenges and pathways for sustainable development. Journal of Building Engineering. 86, 108861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.108861
  122. Lazzari, L.K., Perondi, D., Zampieri, V.B., et al., 2019. Cellulose/biochar aerogels with excellent mechanical and thermal insulation properties. Cellulose. 26, 9071–9083.
  123. Boumaaza, M., Belaadi, A., Bourchak, M., et al., 2023. Optimization of flexural properties and thermal conductivity of Washingtonia plant biomass waste biochar reinforced bio-mortar. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 23, 3515–3536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.009
  124. Zhang, Y., He, M., Wang, L., et al., 2022. Biochar as construction materials for achieving carbon neutrality. Biochar. 4, 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S42773-022-00182-X
  125. Osman, A.I., Farghali, M., Dong, Y., et al., 2023. Reducing the carbon footprint of buildings using biochar-based bricks and insulating materials: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 22, 71–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10311-023-01662-7
  126. Santos, M.M., Diez, M.A., Suárez, M., et al., 2021. Innovative particleboard material from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Journal of Building Engineering. 44, 103375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.103375
  127. Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W.J.V., Salomone, R., 2020. A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 161, 104917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917