New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

A Proposal to Use Power from Marine Solar-Thermal Injection Power System to Drive a Seawater Desalination-Electrolysis Plant

Downloads

Miljkovic, M. (2025). A Proposal to Use Power from Marine Solar-Thermal Injection Power System to Drive a Seawater Desalination-Electrolysis Plant. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v3i2.336

Authors

In order to enable the unlimited use of thermal energy from fluids in natural environment, the need for a completely new power cycle arose that would be the most efficient and could generate power from low temperature sources (e.g. seas, lakes or atmosphere). The idea to apply an injector (ejector or thermal compressor) in a power cycle led to the discovery of the Injection Power Cycle (IPC). As the efficiency of conventional Thermal Compressor (TC) was not sufficient to allow the operation of the IPC in real conditions, a cooling stream was introduced into the conventional TC. In this way the compression of Working Fluid (WF) is intensified resulting in an increase of overall efficiency of TC. However, the efficiency of the IPC was still slightly below the efficiency of the Rankine Power Cycle (RPC). In order to further increase the efficiency of IPC, the external turbine is shifted into the TC allowing the use of full heat potential of the total mass flow of WF through the TC. That is how the IPC became the most efficient power cycle. Finally, the author proposes to use power from marine solar-thermal power generation system based on the IPC to drive a seawater desalination-electrolysis plant in order to produce potable water and/or Hydrogen.

Keywords:

Power Cycle; Renewable Energy; Injector; Solar-Thermal System; Desalination; Hydrogen

References

  1. Miljkovic, M. Ejector Refrigeration Cycle with the Injection of a High Density Fluid into a Diffuser (a Mixing Chamber). In Proceedings of the World Engineer’s Summit (WES) on Climate Change 2015, Singapore, 21-24 July 2015.
  2. Ejector Refrigeration Cycle with the Injection of a High Density Fluid into a Diffuser (a Mixing Chamber). World Engineer’s Summit on Climate Change (WES) 2015, Singapore, 21-24 July 2015. Available online: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ejector-refrigeration-cycle-with-the-injection-of-a-high-density-fluid-into-a-diffuser-a-mixing-chamber/266730494 (accessed on 11 March 2024).
  3. Miljkovic, M. Ejector Refrigeration Cycle with Internal Cooling. American J. Eng. Res. 2018, 7, 102–108.
  4. Miljkovic, M. Injection Power Cycle applied in OTEC Power Plants. Energy Procedia 2017, 143, 823–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.769
  5. Khan, M.A.; Al-Attas, T.A.; Roy, S.; Rahman, M.M.; Hu, J.; Ajayan, P.M.; Kibria, M.G. Seawater Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production: A Solution Looking for a Problem? ChemRxiv 2021, volume, page range. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.14138390.v1
  6. Thermodynamic Chapter 3 First Law of Thermodynamics. Available online: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/thermodynamic-chapter-3-first-law-of-thermodynamics/23833368 (accessed on 03 July 2013).
  7. Eppinger, J.; Huang, K.W. Formic Acid as a Hydrogen Energy Carrier. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 188–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00574
  8. Lee H-S, Yoon J-I, Son C-H, et al. Efficiency enhancement of the ocean thermal energy conversion system with a vapor–vapor ejector. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2015, 7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015571036
  9. Yoon, JI., Son, CH., Baek, SM. et al. Efficiency comparison of subcritical OTEC power cycle using various working fluids. Heat Mass Transfer 2014, 50, 985–996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1310-8
  10. Faizal, M., Ahmed, M.R. Experimental studies on a closed cycle demonstration OTEC plant working on small temperature difference. Renewable Energy 2013, 51, 234-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.041
  11. Cerezo-Acevedo, E., Cupul J.G.T., Medina V.M.R., et al. Analysis and Development of Closed Cycle OTEC System. In Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) - Past, Present, and Progress; Kim, A., Kim, HJ, Eds; IntechOpen: London, United Kingdom. pp. 99-112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90609
  12. Ma, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Lu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Wu, Z.; Shen, Y.; Liu, X. A Novel Ocean Thermal Energy Driven System for Sustainable Power and Fresh Water Supply. Membranes 2022, 12, 160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020160
  13. Samsuri, N.; Sazali, N.; Jamaludin, A.S.; Razali, M.N.M. Simulation Modeling The Performance of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Power Cycle. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1062, 012034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1062/1/012034
  14. Yuan, H.; Mei, N.; Li, Y. et al. Theoretical and experimental investigation on a liquid-gas ejector power cycle using ammonia-water. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2013, 56, 2289–2298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5292-4
  15. Ahmad, M.; Karimi, M. N. Thermodynamic Analysis of Kalina Cycle. Int J. Sci. Res. 2016, 5, 2244–2249.
  16. Ikegami, Y.; Yasunaga, T.; Morisaki, T. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Using Double-Stage Rankine Cycle. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018; 6, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6010021
  17. Uehara, H., Ikegami, Y., Nishida, T. Performance analysis of OTEC system using a cycle with absorption and extraction processes. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., B 1998, 64, 2750–2755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.64.2750 (in Japanese)
  18. Yi, S.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, W.; Zhang, J.; Han, Y. Pre-expansion ejector absorption power cycle for ocean thermal energy conversion. Energy Convers. Manage. 2022, 269, 116151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116151