New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

New Methanation Reactor by Reciprocating Engine (MeRE)

Downloads

Yamamoto, K., & Matsuura , Y. (2024). New Methanation Reactor by Reciprocating Engine (MeRE). New Energy Exploitation and Application, 3(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v3i2.328

Authors

  • Kazuhiro Yamamoto
    Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8603, Japan
  • Yuya Matsuura Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8603, Japan

Methanation, which synthesizes methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen, can potentially be an important core technology for realizing a carbon-neutral society. A catalyst is normally used in the methanation process, but its thermal degradation is a serious problem. Thus, we have proposed a catalyst-free methanation reactor that simulates an internal combustion engine. We call it a Methanation Reciprocating Engine (MeRE), where the up-and-down motion of the piston inside the engine creates a high-temperature, high-pressure field inside the reactor that is suitable for the methanation reaction. In this study, we conducted a 0-dimensional simulation using a program package, Chemkin-II. To make clear the reactor characteristics based on the reaction process in the MeRE, we used an ICEN code (Internal Combustion Engine) to simulate the MeRE. We changed the initial temperature, the components of reactants, the rotational speed, and the compression ratio. It is found that the reaction rate of methane production can be enlarged by increasing the initial temperature, the compression ratio, and the rotational speed. Additionally, it is better to set the composition which is close to the stoichiometric ratio of the Sabatier reaction. For all cases, the CO2 conversion rate is high, but the CH4 selectivity is very low. Resultantly, in the case of the MeRE, it is easy to produce CO from CO2, while the reaction which converts from CO to CH4 is unlikely to take place.

Keywords:

Renewable Energy; Methanation; Hydrogen; Synthetic Natural Gas; Internal Combustion Engine

References

  1. Ghezloun, A.; Saidane, A.; Merabet, H. The COP 22 New commitments in support of the Paris Agreement. Energy Procedia 2017, 119, 10–16.
  2. Musah, M.; Ahakwa, I.; Asongu, S.A.; et al. Unlocking the COP28 climate agenda in G10 economies: Do environmental taxes and environmentally-related technologies matter in the natural resource-load capacity factor connection? Sustain. Futur. 2024, 8, 100341.
  3. 1.5°C-consistent benchmarks for enhancing Japan’s 2030 climate target. Available online: URL https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/841/2021_03_CAT_1.5C-consistent_benchmarks_Japan_NDC.pdf (cited 5 March 2025).
  4. Sánchez-Bastardo, N.; Schlögl, R.; Ruland, H. Methane pyrolysis for zero-emission hydrogen production: a potential bridge technology from fossil fuels to a renewable and sustainable hydrogen economy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 11855–11881.
  5. Tada, S.; Shimizu, T.; Kameyama, H.; et al. Ni/CeO2 catalysts with high CO2 methanation activity and high CH4 selectivity at low temperatures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 5527–5531.
  6. Le, T.A.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, S.H.; et al. CO and CO2 methanation over supported Ni catalysts. Catal .Today 2017, 293–294, 89–96.
  7. Wulf, C.; Linßen, J.; Zapp, P. Review of power-to-gas projects in Europe. Energy Procedia 2018, 155, 367–378.
  8. Farsi, S.; Olbrich, W.; Pfeifer, P.; Dittmeyer, R.A consecutive methanation scheme for conversion of CO2 – A study on Ni3Fe catalyst in a short-contact time micro packed bed reactor. Chem Eng J 2020, 388, 1–11.
  9. Lin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Machida, H.; Norinaga, K. CFD simulation of the Sabatier process in a shell-and-tube reactor under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions: parameter sensitivity and reaction mechanism analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 15254–15269.
  10. Gahleitner, G. Hydrogen from renewable electricity an international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38 (5), 2039–2061.
  11. Singh, S.; Jain, S.; Venkateswaran, P.S.; et al. Hydrogen: A sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 623–633.
  12. Er-rbib, H.; Bouallou, C. Modeling and simulation of CO methanation process for renewable electricity storage. Energy 2014, 75, 81–88.
  13. Bailera, M.; Lisbona, P.; Romeo, L.M.; et al. Power to gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 292–312.
  14. de Vries, H.; Mokhov, A.V.; Levinsky, H.B. The impact of natural gas/hydrogen mixtures on the performance of end-use equipment: Interchangeability analysis for domestic appliances. Appl. Energy 2017, 208, 1007–1019.
  15. Isaac, T. HyDeploy: The UK’s first hydrogen blending deployment project. Clean Energy 2019, 3, 114–125.
  16. Onuka, S.; Umemura, A.; Takahashi, R.; et al. Frequency control of power system with renewable power sources by HVDC interconnection line and battery considering energy balancing. J. Power Energy Eng. 2020, 8, 11–24.
  17. Wang, B.; Mikhail, M.; Cavadias, S.; et al. Improvement of the activity of CO2 methanation in a hybrid plasma-catalytic process in varying catalyst particle size or under pressure. J .CO2 Util. 2021, 46, 2–9.
  18. Takano, H.; Shinomiya, H.; Izumiya, K.; et al. CO2 methanation of Ni catalysts supported on tetragonal ZrO2 doped with Ca2+ and Ni2+ ions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 8347–8355.
  19. Yamamoto, K.; Sakaguchi, K. Hydrogen reactivity factor and effects of oxygen on methane conversion rate by chemical equilibrium calculation. Int. J. Thermofluids 2022, 15, 100186.
  20. Yamamoto, K.; Sakaguchi, K. 1D Modeling of methanation reactor with circulation (MeRCi) for assessment of reaction characteristics. Int. J. Thermofluids 2023, 20, 100513.
  21. Chemkin-II: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics. Available online: UR https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5681118 L (cited 5 March 2025).
  22. Beuls, A.; Swalus, C.; Jacquemin, M.; et al. Methanation of CO2: further insight into the mechanism over Rh/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 113–114, 2–10.
  23. Aldana, P.A.U.; Ocampo, F.; Kobl, K.; et al. Catalytic CO2 valorization into CH4 on Ni-basedceria-zirconia. Reaction mechanism by operando IR spectroscopy. Catal. Today 2013, 215, 201–207.
  24. Zhu, H.; Razzaq, R.; Li, C.; et al. Catalytic methanation of carbon dioxide by active oxygen material CexZr1-xO2 supported Nico bimetallic nanocatalysts. AiChE J. 2013, 59, 2567–2576.
  25. Aziz, M.A.A.; Jalil, A.A.; Triwahyono, S.; et al. Highly active Ni-promoted mesostructured silica nanoparticles for CO2 methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 147, 359–368.
  26. Pan, Q.; Peng, J.; Sun, T.; et al. Insight into the reaction route of CO2 methanation: promotion effect of medium basic sites. Catal. Commun. 2014, 45, 74–78.
  27. Westermann, A.; Azambre, B.; Bacariza, M.C.; et al. Insight into CO2 methanation mechanism over NiUSY zeolites: an operando IR study. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 174–175, 120–125.
  28. Kakoee, A.; Gharehghani, A. Carbon oxides methanation in equilibrium; a thermodynamic approach. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 29993–30008.
  29. Costa, P.D.; Hasrack, G.; Bonnety, J.; et al. Ni-based catalysts for plasma-assisted CO2 methanation. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 32, 100540.
  30. Ullah, S.; Gao, Y.; Dou, L.; et al. Recent trends in plasma-assisted CO2 methanation: A critical review of recent studies. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2023, 43, 1335–1383.