The Mediation Effects of Fear on the Relationship between Gain/Loss Message Frames and Cognitive/Conative Responses

Sumin Shin ,  Sanghee Park ,  Eyun-Jung Ki
    Received: 21 January 2022
    Published: 24 January 2022

    Abstract

    This study investigates the underlying mechanism of fear appeal effects on behavioral changes applying the emotions-as-frame model and protection motivation theory to the green advertising context. The results indicate that a loss-framed message arises fear increasing severity, vulnerability, response efficacy, and self-efficacy, which in turn affect the intention to purchase a green product. Furthermore, this study results that a gain frame is more effective to lead green behavior than a loss frame.

    Keywords

    References

    1. [1] Moser, S.C., Dilling, L., 2004. Making climate hot. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 46(10), 32-46.
    2. [2] LaTour, M.S., Pitts, R.E., 1989. Using fear appeals in advertising for AIDS prevention in the college-age population. Journal of Health Care Marketing. 9(3). 5-14.
    3. [3] Chang, K.C., Strong, C., Pakpour, A.H., 2020. Factors related to preventive COVID-19 infection behaviors among people with mental illness. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 119(12), 1772- 1780.
    4. [4] Chen, L., Yang, X., 2018. Using EPPM to evaluate the effectiveness of fear appeal messages across different media outlets to increase the intention of breast self-examination among Chinese women. Health Communication. 34(11), 1369-1373.
    5. [5] Jensen, J.D., Ratcliff, C.L., Yale, R.N., et al., 2018. Persuasive impact of loss and gain frames on intentions to exercise: A test of six moderators. Communication Monographs. 85(2), 245-262.
    6. [6] Davis, J.J., 1995. The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 72(2), 285-299.
    7. [7] Homar, A.R., Cvelbar, L.K., 2021. The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics. 183, 1-18.
    8. [8] O’Keefe, D.J., Jensen, J.D., 2009. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication. 59(2), 296-316.
    9. [9] O’keefe, D.J., Jensen, J.D., 2006. The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Annals of the International Communication Association. 30(1), 1-43.
    10. [10] Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A.M., et al., 2019. The effect of negative message framing on green consumption: An investigation of the role of shame. Journal of Business Ethics. 157(4), 1111-1132.
    11. [11] Lu, H., 2016. The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication. 38(2), 143-169.
    12. [12] Nabi, R.L., 2003. Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research. 30(2), 224-247.
    13. [13] Nabi, R.L., Gustafson, A., Jensen, R., 2018. Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication. 40(4), 442-468.
    14. [14] Ahn, S.J., Fox, J., Dale, K.R., et al., 2015. Framing virtual experiences: Effects on environmental efficacy and behavior over time. Communication Research. 42(6), 839-863.
    15. [15] Morton, T.A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., 2011. The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change. 21(1), 103-109.
    16. [16] Witte, K., 1992. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs. 59(4), 329-349.
    17. [17] Witte, K., 1994. Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communications Monographs. 61(2), 113-134.
    18. [18] Rogers, R.W., Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R., 1983. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo (Ed.), Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. pp. 153-177.
    19. [19] Witte, K., Allen, M., 2000. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior. 27(5), 591-615.
    20. [20] Shi, J., Smith, S.W., 2016. The effects of fear appeal message repetition on perceived threat, perceived efficacy, and behavioral intention in the extended parallel process model. Health Communication. 31(3), 275-286.
    21. [21] Jang, K., Park, N., 2018. The effects of repetitive information communication through multiple channels on prevention behavior during the 2015 MERS outbreak in South Korea. Journal of health communication. 23(7), 670-678.
    22. [22] Kim, S., Jeong, S.H., Hwang, Y., 2012. Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of American and Korean students: The application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory. Science Communication. 35(2), 168-188.
    23. [23] Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., D’Souza, C., et al., 2013. Nuclear power threats, public opposition and green electricity adoption: Effects of threat belief appraisal and fear arousal. Energy Policy. 62, 1366-1376.
    24. [24] Shin, S., Ki, E.J., Griffin, W.G., 2017. The effectiveness of fear appeals in ‘green’advertising: An analysis of creative, consumer, and source variables. Journal of Marketing Communications. 23(5), 473-492.
    25. [25] Bickart, B.A., Ruth, J.A., 2012. Green Eco-Seals and Advertising Persuasion. Journal of Advertising. 41(4), 51-67.
    26. [26] Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The moderator– mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    27. [27] Pollay, R.W., 1983. Measuring the cultural values manifest in advertising. Current Issues and Research in Advertising. 6(1), 71-92.
    28. [28] Lavidge, R.J., Steiner, G.A., 1961. A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing. 25(6), 59-62.
    ×