Energy Enhancement in Multipath Routing Protocol Based Antnet and Artificial Intelligent Model in Wireless Sensor Networks

Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Article

Energy Enhancement in Multipath Routing Protocol Based Antnet and Artificial Intelligent Model in Wireless Sensor Networks

Sanhaji, F., El Manaa, K., & Satori, H. (2026). Energy Enhancement in Multipath Routing Protocol Based Antnet and Artificial Intelligent Model in Wireless Sensor Networks. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 5(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i1.1783

Authors

  • Farah Sanhaji

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences Dhar-Mahraz, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah University, B.P. 1796, Fez 30003, Morocco
  • Khaoula El Manaa

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences Dhar-Mahraz, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah University, B.P. 1796, Fez 30003, Morocco
  • Hassan Satori

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences Dhar-Mahraz, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah University, B.P. 1796, Fez 30003, Morocco

Received: 29 October 2025; Revised: 25 December 2025; Accepted: 23 January 2026; Published: 10 February 2026

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are characterized by severe energy constraints, dynamic topology, and limited computational resources, making routing design a critical challenge. Traditional single-path and static routing protocols often lead to uneven energy consumption and premature node failures, thereby reducing network lifetime. To address these limitations, this paper proposes an energy-aware multipath routing protocol that integrates AntNet with a lightweight Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model. Unlike existing artificial neural network-ant colony optimization (ANN-ACO) or deep learning based routing approaches, the proposed method does not embed complex learning mechanisms into the routing core. Instead, the MLP model is used as an auxiliary decision-support component to assist AntNet in selecting energy-efficient and reliable paths while preserving low computational overhead. The routing decision process considers residual energy, end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, and routing overhead, enabling a balanced trade-off between energy efficiency and communication performance. The proposed protocol is evaluated using the NS2.35 simulator under different network densities and traffic conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces energy consumption by up to 32% and routing overhead by 28%, while improving packet delivery ratio by 40% and network lifetime by 22% compared to conventional Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and AntNet-based routing protocols. These results confirm that combining AntNet with a lightweight MLP yields an effective and scalable solution for energy-efficient multipath routing in WSNs, without the complexity of deep learning-based schemes.

Keywords:

Wireless Sensor Networks Energy Consumption Multilayer Perceptron Ant Colony Optimization Intelligent Multi-Path Routing Protocol

References

  1. Ramson, S.J.; Moni, D.J. Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Media Technology, Coimbatore, India, 3–4 February 2017; pp. 325–329.
  2. Kandris, D.; Nakas, C.; Vomvas, D.; et al. Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks: An Up-to-Date Survey. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2020, 3, 14.
  3. Srivastava, A.; Mishra, P.K. A Survey on WSN Issues with Its Heuristics and Meta-Heuristics Solutions. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 121, 745–814.
  4. Habboush, A. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) Based MANET Routing Protocols: A Comprehensive Review. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2019, 12, 82–92.
  5. Kumari, P.; Sahana, S.K. QoS-Based ACO Routing Protocols in MANETs: A Review. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Microelectronics, Computing and Communication Systems, Ranchi, India, 11–12 May 2019; pp. 329–340.
  6. Gorgich, S.; Tabatabaei, S. Proposing an Energy-Aware Routing Protocol by Using Fish Swarm Optimization Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 119, 1935–1955.
  7. Benmansour, F.L.; Labraoui, N. A Comprehensive Review on Swarm Intelligence-Based Routing Protocols in Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2021, 28, 175–198.
  8. Baran, B.; Sosa, R. A New Approach for AntNet Routing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 16–18 October 2000; pp. 303–308.
  9. Gü nes, M.; Kähmer, M.; Bouazizi, I. Ant-Routing-Algorithm (ARA) for Mobile Multi-Hop Ad-Hoc Networks: New Features and Results. In Proceedings of the 2nd Mediterranean Workshop on Ad-Hoc Networks, Mahdia, Tunisia, 25–27 June 2003; pp. 9–20.
  10. Di Caro, G.; Ducatelle, F.; Gambardella, L.M. AntHocNet: An Adaptive Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Eur. Trans. Telecommun. 2005, 16, 443–455.
  11. Abd Elmoniem, A.M.; Ibrahim, H.M.; Mohamed, M.H.; et al. Ant Colony and Load Balancing Optimizations for AODV Routing Protocol. Int. J. Sens. Netw. Data Commun. 2012, 1, 1–14.
  12. Mohan, B.C.; Baskaran, R. A Survey: Ant Colony Optimization Based Recent Research and Implementation on Several Engineering Domains. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 4618–4627.
  13. Gutjahr, W.J. Mathematical Runtime Analysis of ACO Algorithms: Survey on an Emerging Issue. Swarm Intell. 2007, 1, 59–79.
  14. Moussa, N.; Nurellari, E.; El Alaoui, A.E.B. A Novel Energy-Efficient and Reliable ACO-Based Routing Protocol for WSN-Enabled Forest Fires Detection. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2022, 13, 1–17.
  15. Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, E.-J.; Park, H.-S. Ant Colony Optimization-Based Energy Saving Routing for Energy-Efficient Networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2011, 15, 779–781.
  16. Nayyar, A.; Singh, R. A Comprehensive Review of Ant Colony Optimization-Based Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. Int. J. Wirel. Netw. Broadband Technol. 2014, 3, 33–55.
  17. Affane, A.R.; Satori, H.; Sanhaji, F.; et al. Energy Enhancement of Routing Protocol with Hidden Markov Model in Wireless Sensor Networks. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 1–13.
  18. Moussa, N.; El Alaoui, A.E.B. An Energy-Efficient Cluster-Based Routing Protocol Using Unequal Clustering and Improved ACO Techniques for WSNs. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2021, 14, 1334–1347.
  19. Nayyar, A.; Singh, R. IEEMARP: A Novel Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol Based on Ant Colony Optimization for Dynamic Sensor Networks. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020, 79, 35221–35252.
  20. Panda, N.; Sahu, P.K.; Parhi, M.; et al. A Survey on Energy Awareness Mechanisms in ACO-Based Routing Protocols for MANETs. In Intelligent and Cloud Computing; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 791–800.
  21. Kumar, M.S., Sathish Kumar, G.A. Enhanced ant colony optimization algorithm for packet delivery with improved energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2023, 44, 7909–7917.
  22. Sanhaji, F.; Satori, H.; Satori, K. Clustering Based on Neural Networks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing and Wireless Communication Systems, Larache, Morocco, 14–16 November 2017; pp. 1–6.
  23. Zroug, S.; Remadna, I.; Kahloul, L.; et al. Towards Performance Evaluation Prediction in WSNs Using Artificial Neural Network Multi-Perceptron. Clust. Comput. 2022, 25, 1–19.
  24. Swain, R.R.; Khilar, P.M. A Fuzzy MLP Approach for Fault Diagnosis in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference, Singapore, 22–25 November 2016; pp. 3183–3188.
  25. Widiasari, I.R.; Nugroho, L.E.; Widyawan. Deep Learning Multilayer Perceptron for Flood Prediction Model Using Wireless Sensor Network Based Hydrology Time Series Data Mining. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative and Creative Information Technology, Salatiga, Indonesia, 2–4 November 2017; pp. 1–5.
  26. Sanhaji, F.; Satori, H.; Satori, K. Cluster Head Selection Based on Neural Networks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems, Fez, Morocco, 3–4 April 2019; pp. 1–5.
  27. Rahman, M.S.; Kim, H. MLP-Assisted Reliable Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Residual Energy and Link Quality Prediction. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 54012–54025.
  28. Singh, A.; Kumar, D. A Hybrid ACO–ANN Intelligent Routing Algorithm for Lifetime Enhancement in Wireless Sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 2023, 140, 103061.
  29. Al-Shammari, F.; Khan, I. Energy-Aware Multipath Routing Using Adaptive Learning in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks. Comput. Netw. 2024, 238, 110000.
  30. Sharma, H.; Haque, A.; Blaabjerg, F. Machine Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks for Smart Cities: A Survey. Electronics 2021, 10, 1012.
  31. Thangaramya, K.; Kulothungan, K.; Logambigai, R.; et al. Energy Aware Cluster and Neuro-Fuzzy Based Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks in IoT. Comput. Netw. 2019, 151, 211–223.
  32. Moundounga, A.R.A.; Satori, H.; Satori, K. An Overview of Routing Techniques in WSNs. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences, Fez, Morocco, 21–23 October 2020; pp. 1–7.
  33. Sharifi, S.A.; Babamir, S.M. The Clustering Algorithm for Efficient Energy Management in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Comput. Netw. 2020, 166, 103983.
  34. Di Caro, G.; Dorigo, M. AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 1998, 9, 317–365.
  35. Di Caro, G.; Dorigo, M. Ant Colony Optimization and Its Application to Adaptive Routing in Telecommunication Networks. PhD Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
  36. Abiodun, O.I.; Jantan, A.; Omolara, A.E.; et al. State-of-the-Art in Artificial Neural Network Applications: A Survey. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00938.
  37. Du, K.-L.; Swamy, M. Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. In Neural Networks and Statistical Learning; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 407–417.
  38. Taud, H.; Mas, J. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). In Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 451–455.
  39. Thomas, P.; Thomas, B. Multilayer Perceptron for Simmons Models Reduction: Application to a Sawmill Workshop. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2011, 24, 646–657.
  40. Ke, K.-C.; Huang, M.-S. Quality Prediction for Injection Molding by Using a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network. Polymers 2020, 12, 1812.
  41. Petrini, M. Improvements to the Backpropagation Algorithm. Ann. Univ. Petrosani Econ. 2012, 12, 185–192.
  42. Ahlawat, A.; Pandey, S. A Variant of Back-Propagation Algorithm for Multilayer Feed-Forward Network. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Research and Applications, Varna, Bulgaria, 26–30 June 2007; p. 238.