Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

The Air Quality Data–Policy Gap: Institutional, Political, and Behavioral Barriers to Effective Decision-Making

Naboke Zeinab Tiene ORCID ,  Gladys Averina ORCID ,  Ninia Saakashvili ORCID ,  Rima Isaifan ORCID
    Received: 1 July 2025; Revised: 22 September 2025; Accepted: 9 October 2025; Published: 6 November 2025

    Abstract

    Air pollution remains a critical public health and environmental challenge, despite significant advancements in monitoring technologies and the widespread availability of high-resolution air quality data. This study examines a persistent paradox: why improved data availability does not consistently translate into effective policy action. Adopting a qualitative synthesis approach, the research analyzes evidence from multiple Asian contexts, including China, India, Pakistan, and Southeast Asia, to investigate the structural factors shaping the data–policy relationship. The study develops a conceptual framework that positions air quality data as a necessary but insufficient condition for effective policymaking, emphasizing the mediating role of institutional, political, and behavioral factors. The findings reveal that fragmented governance structures, weak enforcement mechanisms, limited administrative capacity, and misaligned political incentives systematically constrain the translation of data into action. In several cases, data is underutilized, selectively interpreted, or overshadowed by short-term policy priorities and socioeconomic considerations. Additionally, trust deficits and limited technical expertise further weaken the effectiveness of data-driven decision-making processes. The analysis demonstrates that the gap between knowledge and action is fundamentally a governance challenge rather than a technical one. Addressing this gap requires a shift from data-centric approaches toward strengthening the institutional and political conditions under which data is interpreted and applied. The study contributes to the literature by advancing a theoretically grounded framework for understanding the data–policy gap and offers policy-relevant insights for improving air quality governance in complex, multi-level contexts. Beyond air quality governance, the findings have broader implications for climate policy implementation and green economy transitions, highlighting the importance of institutional capacity, governance coherence, and stakeholder trust in translating environmental data into effective policy action.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. WHO. WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228 (accessed on 17 March 2025).
    2. 2. Brauer, M.; Amann, M.; Burnett, R.T.; et al. Exposure Assessment for Estimation of the Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Outdoor Air Pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 652–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es2025752
    3. 3. State of Global Air. Available online: https://www.stateofglobalair.org/reports-resources (accessed on 17 March 2025).
    4. 4. Miller, R.; Whelan, H.; Chrubasik, M.; et al. A Framework for Current and New Data Quality Dimensions: An Overview. Data 2024, 9, 151.
    5. 5. Al-Thani, L.; Isaifan, R.J. Breathing in the margins: Rethinking indoor air pollution and housing equity in urban slums. Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9, 453–477.
    6. 6. Isaifan, R.J.; Al-Thani, H.G. Action Taken to Reduce Air Pollution and Its One Health Impacts in MENA Countries. In Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation: Development, Economics, and Technologies; Ogwu, M.C., Izah, S.C., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 439–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2024_1094
    7. 7. OECD. Environment. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/environment.html (accessed on 17 March 2025).
    8. 8. Goyal, P.; Gulia, S.; Goyal, S.K. Development of strategic air quality improvement framework for urban hotspots. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 380, 134886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134886
    9. 9. Feng, X.; Feng, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 during haze episodes in Shanghai by the PMF model with PAHs. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129850
    10. 10. Jin, Y.; Andersson, H.; Zhang, S. Air Pollution Control Policies in China: A Retrospective and Prospects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121219
    11. 11. Li, W.; Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. Environmental governance for sustainable development in Asia. J. Environ. Manage. 2021, 290, 112622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112622
    12. 12. Huang, H.; Fu, D.; Qi, W. Effect of driving restrictions on air quality in Lanzhou, China: Analysis integrated with internet data source. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1013–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.082
    13. 13. Hassabou, A.; Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. Techno-Economic Analysis and Assessment of an Innovative Solar Hybrid Photovoltaic Thermal Collector for Transient Net Zero Emissions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188304
    14. 14. Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Transport Emissions: An Investigation of Elasticity-Based Decoupling Metrics in the Gulf. Economies 2025, 13, 10323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13110323
    15. 15. Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. The Energy-Economy Nexus of Advanced Air Pollution Control Technologies: Pathways to Sustainable Development. Energies 2025, 18, 2378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092378
    16. 16. Zelli, F.; van Asselt, H. Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses. Glob. Environ. Polit. 2013, 13, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00180
    17. 17. Monks, P.S.; Williams, M.L. What does success look like for air quality policy? A perspective. Philos. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2020, 378, 20190326.
    18. 18. UNEP - UN Environment Programme. Air Pollution in Asia and the Pacific: Science-based solutions. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/assessment/air-pollution-asia-and-pacific-science-based-solutions (accessed on 23 March 2025).
    19. 19. Wu, D.; Xie, Y.; Liu, D. Rethinking the complex effects of the clean energy transition on air pollution abatement: Evidence from China’s coal-to-gas policy. Energy 2023, 283, 128413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128413
    20. 20. Li, P.; Lu, Y.; Peng, L.; et al. Information, incentives, and environmental governance: Evidence from China’s ambient air quality standards. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2024, 128, 103066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.103066
    21. 21. OECD. Managing the distributional effects of environmental and climate policies. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/managing-the-distributional-effects-of-environmental-and-climate-policies_361126bd-en.html (accessed on 16 March 2025).
    22. 22. Zahid, M.; Baig, R.T.; Fatima, H.; et al. Current landscape and future directions of policies addressing air quality improvement in Pakistan: A scoping review. J. Glob. Health 2025, 15, 04349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04349
    23. 23. Dudman, K.; Schulte, K.; Dobson, R. Update air quality management to support meaningful public participation. Commun. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02818-9
    24. 24. Srivastava, R.P.; Kumar, S.; Tiwari, A. Continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) in India: Performance evaluation, policy gaps and financial implications for effective air pollution control. J. Environ. Manage. 2024, 359, 120584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120584
    25. 25. Zhong, L.; Louie, P.K.K.; Zheng, J.; et al. Science–policy interplay: Air quality management in the Pearl River Delta region and Hong Kong. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 76, 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.012
    26. 26. Kaginalkar, A.; Kumar, S.; Gargava, P.; et al. SmartAirQ: A Big Data Governance Framework for Urban Air Quality Management in Smart Cities. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 785129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.785129
    27. 27. Sriram, S.; Adhikari, S. Binding Multilateral Framework for South Asian Air Pollution Control: An Urgent Call for SAARC-UN Cooperation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22111628
    28. 28. Brehm, S.; Svensson, J. A fragmented environmental state? Analysing spatial compliance patterns for the case of transparency legislation in China. Asia-Pac. J. Reg. Sci. 2017, 1, 471–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-017-0058-9
    29. 29. Zhang, Z.X. Asian energy and environmental policy: Promoting growth while preserving the environment. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 3905–3924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.015
    30. 30. Feng, L.; Liao, W. Legislation, plans, and policies for prevention and control of air pollution in China: Achievements, challenges, and improvements. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1549–1558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.013
    31. 31. UNFPA. Population trends. Available online: https://asiapacific.unfpa.org/en/topics/population-trends (accessed on 15 March 2025).
    32. 32. IMF. World Economic Outlook Database - Groups and Aggregates Information. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/weo/weo-database/2023/april/groups-and-aggregates (accessed on 16 March 2025).
    33. 33. Reddy, B.S.; Assenza, G.B. Climate change—A developing country perspective. Curr. Sci. 2009, 97, 50–62.
    34. 34. World Bank. Air Quality Management in Central Asia. Available online: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099050125114025800 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
    35. 35. Kramer, A.; Minet, L. Zones of exposure: Urban micro-environments of air pollution and residential intensification. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 127, 106404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106404
    36. 36. Rajasegaram, A.; Kumaran, S.; Gani, P. Environmental Injustice in Southeast Asia: Pollution, Power, Inequality, Governance Failures and Community Resistance Pathways. Quantum J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2025, 6, 295–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.1030
    37. 37. Lu, X.; Zhu, E.; Campbell, L.; et al. Comparison between China, the EU and the US’s climate and energy governance: How policies are made and implemented at different levels. 2021. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep38967 (accessed on 26 March 2025).
    38. 38. Badach, J.; Szczepański, J.; Bonenberg, W.; et al. Developing the Urban Blue-Green Infrastructure as a Tool for Urban Air Quality Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159688
    39. 39. Vandenbulcke, B.; Verhaeghe, N.; Cruycke, L.; et al. Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Air Pollution Mitigation Strategies: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060926
    40. 40. Krzyżewska, A. Breathing Cities: Air Quality, Population Exposure, and Sustainability Implications in 33 European Capitals. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167476
    ×