Exergy‑Based Performance Evaluation of Solar Dryers: A Critical Review of Adopted Approaches

Gustavo Aragão Correia ORCID ,  Keyse Santos Andrade ORCID ,  Marcos Fábio Farias Souza ORCID ,  Manoel Marcelo do Prado ORCID
    Received: 12 March 2026; Revised: 8 May 2026; Accepted: 20 May 2026; Published: 14 July 2026

    Abstract

    Drying is a key unit operation in industrial processes, yet it is inherently energy-intensive, particularly when conventional technologies are employed. Solar dryers have emerged as sustainable alternatives due to their reduced dependence on fossil fuels and lower environmental impact. However, improving their performance requires a rigorous thermodynamic assessment, for which exergy analysis provides a more comprehensive framework by accounting for both energy quality and process irreversibilities. Despite its potential, the application of exergy analysis to solar drying systems remains inconsistent in the literature, with significant variations in definitions, assumptions, and formulations adopted. This lack of standardization compromises the reliability and comparability of reported performance indicators. In this study, the formulations commonly used in the exergy analysis of solar dryers are systematically reviewed and critically evaluated. The results indicate that the widespread use of outlet air exergy in the calculation of exergy efficiency may not adequately represent the useful energy associated with the drying process. A more physically consistent approach is obtained by considering useful energy in terms of sensible and latent heat transfer, as well as by incorporating formulations derived from radiation theory that account for material absorptance and transmittance. Furthermore, practical recommendations are proposed to improve the accuracy of exergy-based evaluations, including continuous monitoring of product temperature and mass, and modeling the drying agent as a mixture of dry air and water vapor. These findings contribute to the development of a more consistent framework for the thermodynamic assessment and comparison of solar drying systems.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. Chojnacka, K.; Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; et al. Improvements in Drying Technologies—Efficient Solutions for Cleaner Production with Higher Energy Efficiency and Reduced Emission. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 320, 128706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128706
    2. 2. Faria, D.J.; Carvalho, A.P.A.d.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Fermentation of Biomass and Residues from Brazilian Agriculture for 2G Bioethanol Production. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 40298–40314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06579
    3. 3. Gunasekaran, D.L.; Duraisamy, S. Experimental Investigation and 4E+Q (Energy, Exergy, Economic, Environmental, and Quality) Analysis of a Novel Solar Evacuated Tube Dryer. Sol. Energy 2026, 303, 114080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.114080
    4. 4. Nettari, C.; Benseddik, A.; Boubekri, A.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analysis and Drying Kinetics of Pumpkins in a Medium-Size Solar Cabinet Dryer Enhanced with Heat Recovery and Sensible Heat Storage. J. Energy Storage 2026, 143, 119749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.119749
    5. 5. Rajesh, S.; Madhankumar, S.; Arunkumar, P.M.; et al. Drying Kinetics, Energy, Exergy, and Economic Aspects of Indirect Solar Dryer with Phase Change Material. Sol. Energy 2026, 305, 114287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.114287
    6. 6. Alsakran, A.A.; Younis, O.S.; Székács, A.; et al. CFD, Energy, and Exergy Analysis and Sustainability Indicators of Tilapia Fish Strips Drying Using an Evacuated Tubes Indirect Solar Dryer. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 25893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11230-4
    7. 7. Anyaoha, C.O.; Okoroigwe, F.C.; Okoroigwe, C.N.; et al. A Review of Optimization Strategies for Solar-Biomass Dryers. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2025, 83, 104672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.104672
    8. 8. Rashid, F.L.; Hammoodi, K.A.; Al Maimuri, N.M.L.; et al. Recent Advancements in Hybrid Solar Dryer: A Comprehensive Review of Integration Strategies, Performance Enhancements, and Applications. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2026, 171, 110042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.110042
    9. 9. Salami, P.; Safvati, M.; Barghi Jahromi, M.S.; et al. Classification of Fruit Solar Dryers and the Role of Phase Change Materials in Enhancing Performance: A Review. Sol. Energy 2025, 297, 113570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113570
    10. 10. Saha, C.K.; Roy, N.K.; Khatun, J.; et al. Solar Hybrid Dryers for Fruits, Vegetables, and Fish: A Comprehensive Review on Constructional Features and Techno-Economic-Environmental Analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 68, 103878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.103878
    11. 11. Prajapati, P.; Raja, B.D.; Savaliya, H.; et al. Thermodynamic Evaluation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger through Advanced Exergy Analysis. Energy 2024, 292, 130421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130421
    12. 12. Qamar, Z.; Munir, A.; Amjad, W.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Solar Assisted Milk Powder Spray Dryer. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2025, 57, 103131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.103131
    13. 13. Dutta, P.; Das, H.; Dutta, P.P.; et al. Evaluation of an Improved Indirect Solar Dryer for Curcuma Amada without and with Stone Chips as Thermal Energy Storage: An Investigation on Kinetics, Energy, Exergy, Quality and Economic Aspects. J. Energy Storage 2024, 79, 110199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.110199
    14. 14. Gilago, M.C.; Mugi, V.R.; Chandramohan, V.P. Evaluating the Environ-Economic and Exergy-Energy Impacts of Drying Carrots in Passive and Active Mode Solar Dryers. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2023, 43, 101956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101956
    15. 15. Hadibi, T.; Mennouche, D.; Boubekri, A.; et al. Drying Characteristic, Sustainability, and 4E (Energy, Exergy, and Enviro-Economic) Analysis of Dried Date Fruits Using Indirect Solar-Electric Dryer: An Experimental Investigation. Renew. Energy 2023, 218, 119291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119291
    16. 16. Barpatra Gohain, R.J.; Dutta, P.P.; Bora, N. Exergy, Economic and Environmental Impacts Analysis of a Solar-Biomass Powered Hybrid Dryer for Drying Eryngium Foetidum. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2025, 59, 103325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103325
    17. 17. Ndukwu, M.C.; Augustine, E.B.; Ugwu, E.; et al. Drying Kinetics and Thermo-Economic Analysis of Drying Hot Water Blanched Ginger Rhizomes in a Hybrid Composite Solar Dryer with Heat Exchanger. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13606
    18. 18. Nwakuba, N.; Okafor, V.C.; Okorafor, O.O. Techno-Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Solar-Electric Dryer. Energy Sources Part Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 46, 10289–10313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1782537
    19. 19. Lingayat, A.B.; Chandramohan, V.P.; Raju, V.R.K.; et al. A Review on Indirect Type Solar Dryers for Agricultural Crops—Dryer Setup, Its Performance, Energy Storage and Important Highlights. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114005
    20. 20. Andrade, K.S. Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Solar Dryer for Drying Cassava Peel. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil, 2024. (in Portuguese)
    21. 21. Nidhul, K.; Kumar, S.; Yadav, A.K.; et al. Computational and Experimental Studies on the Development of an Energy-Efficient Drier Using Ribbed Triangular Duct Solar Air Heater. Sol. Energy 2020, 209, 454–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.012
    22. 22. Nidhul, K.; Yadav, A.K.; Anish, S.; et al. Thermo-Hydraulic and Exergetic Performance of a Cost-Effective Solar Air Heater: CFD and Experimental Study. Renew. Energy 2022, 184, 627–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.111
    23. 23. Prajapati, S.; Naik, N.; Chandramohan, V.P. Numerical Solution of Solar Air Heater with Triangular Corrugations for Indirect Solar Dryer: Influence of Pitch and an Optimized Pitch of Corrugation for Enhanced Performance. Sol. Energy 2022, 243, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.044
    24. 24. Mohana, Y.; Mohanapriya, R.; Anukiruthika, T.; et al. Solar Dryers for Food Applications: Concepts, Designs, and Recent Advances. Sol. Energy 2020, 208, 321–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.098
    25. 25. Duffie, J.A.; Beckman, W.A. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 1st ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
    26. 26. Nnamchi, O.; Tom, C.; Akpan, G.; et al. Solar Dryers: A Review of Mechanism, Methods and Critical Analysis of Transport Models Applicable in Solar Drying of Product. Green Energy Resour. 2025, 3, 100118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100118
    27. 27. Arslan, E. Experimental Performance Analysis of Infrared Assisted Solar Air Heater for Continuous Applications of Drying. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2023, 45, 1168–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2176572
    28. 28. César, L.-V.E.; Ana Lilia, C.-M.; Octavio, G.-V.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Mixed-Mode Solar Dryer of Pear Slices (Pyrus Communis L). Energy 2021, 220, 119740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119740
    29. 29. Niksiar, A.; Rahimi, A. Energy and Exergy Analysis for Cocurrent Gas Spray Cooling Systems Based on the Results of Mathematical Modeling and Simulation. Energy 2009, 34, 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.009
    30. 30. Çengel, Y.A.; Boles, M.A. Thermodynamics, 7th ed.; Amgh: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2021. (in Portuguese)
    31. 31. Mohammed, H.N.; Mengüç, M.P. Exergy Efficiency for Radiation Heat Transfer. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 671, 012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012022
    32. 32. Aghbashlo, M. Exergetic Simulation of a Combined Infrared-Convective Drying Process. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 52, 829–844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1594-3
    33. 33. Ekka, J.P.; Muthukumar, P. Exergy Efficiency and Sustainability Indicators of Forced Convection Mixed Mode Solar Dryer System for Drying Process. Renew. Energy 2024, 234, 121256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121256
    34. 34. Flores-Prieto, J.J.; Hernandez, J.A.; Huicochea, A. Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Hybrid Dryer with Air/Water Solar Collectors. Energy 2025, 332, 137076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137076
    35. 35. Hatami, S.; Payganeh, G.; Mehrpanahi, A. Energy and Exergy Analysis of an Indirect Solar Dryer Based on a Dynamic Model. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118809
    36. 36. Mugi, V.R.; Chandramohan, V.P. Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis of an Indirect Type Solar Dryer Using Green Chilli: A Comparative Assessment of Forced and Natural Convection. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 24, 100950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100950
    37. 37. Ndukwu, M.C.; Simo-Tagne, M.; Abam, F.I.; et al. Exergetic Sustainability and Economic Analysis of Hybrid Solar-Biomass Dryer Integrated with Copper Tubing as Heat Exchanger. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03401
    38. 38. Alktranee, M.; Al-Yasiri, Q.; Mohammed, K.S.; et al. Energy, Exergy, and Economic Analysis of Indirect Solar Dryer Integrated Phase Change Material Cans. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2025, 26, 100986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100986.
    39. 39. Aqib, M.; Shah, M.U.H.; Arbab, M.S.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analysis of Forced Convection Solar Drying of Allium Sativum with and with out Sensible Heat Storage. MATEC Web Conf. 2024, 398, 01018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439801018.
    40. 40. Suherman, S.; Susanto, E.E.; Zardani, A.W.; et al. Energy–Exergy Analysis and Mathematical Modeling of Cassava Starch Drying Using a Hybrid Solar Dryer. Cogent Eng. 2020, 7, 1771819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1771819.
    41. 41. Jeter, S.M. Maximum Conversion Efficiency for the Utilization of Direct Solar Radiation. Sol. Energy 1981, 26, 231–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(81)90207-3
    42. 42. Malik, A.; Kumar, M. Assessment of a Mixed-Mode Vertical Solar Dryer for Experimental Turmeric Drying. Sol. Energy 2024, 282, 112980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112980
    43. 43. Petela, R. Exergy of Heat Radiation. J. Heat Transf. 1964, 86, 187–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3687092
    44. 44. Şevik, S.; Aktaş, M.; Dolgun, E.C.; et al. Performance Analysis of Solar and Solar-Infrared Dryer of Mint and Apple Slices Using Energy-Exergy Methodology. Sol. Energy 2019, 180, 537–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.049
    45. 45. Meeso, N.; Nathakaranakule, A.; Madhiyanon, T.; et al. Modelling of Far-Infrared Irradiation in Paddy Drying Process. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 1248–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.003
    46. 46. Bhardwaj, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analyses of Drying Medicinal Herb in a Novel Forced Convection Solar Dryer Integrated with SHSM and PCM. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 45, 101119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101119
    47. 47. Aghdam, A.H.; Shaltouki, S.H.; Nikpey, A.H. Comprehensive Evaluation of a Novel Indirect Hybrid Solar Dryer: Conventional and Advanced Exergy Analysis. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2024, 53, 102743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102743
    48. 48. Anuma, O.; Ndukwu, M.C.; Usoh, G.; et al. Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Natural Convection Solar Greenhouse Drier with Insulated Opaque Walls for Drying Aromatic Yellow Pepper. Renew. Energy 2024, 233, 121141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121141
    49. 49. Brahma, B.; Shukla, A.K.; Baruah, D.C. Energy, Exergy, Economic and Environmental Analysis of Phase Change Material Based Solar Dryer (PCMSD). J. Energy Storage 2024, 88, 111490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111490
    50. 50. Yazici, M.; Kose, R. Energy, Exergy and Economic Investigation of Novel Hybrid Dryer, Indirect Solar Dryer and Traditional Shade Drying. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2023, 49, 102502.
    51. 51. Daliran, A.; Taki, M.; Marzban, A.; et al. Performance Evaluation of Greenhouse Solar Dryer: Energy-Exergy Analysis, CFD Simulation and Eco-Environmental Assessment. Renew. Energy 2025, 238, 121946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121946
    52. 52. Das, B.; Singh, P.; Kalita, P. Sustainable Drying of Baccaurea Ramiflora Using a Mixed-Mode Solar Dryer with Thermal Energy Storage: A Comprehensive 4E Analysis. Renew. Energy 2025, 252, 123517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123517
    53. 53. Deepak, C.N.; Behura, A.K. Experimental Analysis of a Mixed Mode Solar Tunnel Dryer for Drying Tomato: Energy, Exergy and Environmental Assessment. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2025, 63, 103707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103707
    54. 54. Kiburi, F.G.; Kanali, C.L.; Kituu, G.M.; et al. Performance Evaluation and Economic Feasibility of a Solar-Biomass Hybrid Greenhouse Dryer for Drying Banana Slices. Renew. Energy Focus 2020, 34, 60–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2020.06.009
    55. 55. Heydari, A. Experimental Analysis of Hybrid Dryer Combined with Spiral Solar Air Heater and Auxiliary Heating System: Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis. Renew. Energy 2022, 198, 1162–1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.110
    56. 56. Abdelkader, T.K.; Sayed, H.A.A.; Refai, M.; et al. Machine Learning, Mathematical Modeling and 4E (Energy, Exergy, Environmental, and Economic) Analysis of an Indirect Solar Dryer for Drying Sweet Potato. Renew. Energy 2024, 227, 120535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120535
    57. 57. Singh, A.; Sarkar, J.; Sahoo, R.R. Experimental Performance Analysis of Novel Indirect-Expansion Solar-Infrared Assisted Heat Pump Dryer for Agricultural Products. Sol. Energy 2020, 206, 907–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.065
    58. 58. Bejan, A. Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 1st ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016.
    59. 59. Dincer, I.; Sahin, A.Z. A New Model for Thermodynamic Analysis of a Drying Process. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2004, 47, 645–652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.08.013
    60. 60. Mugi, V.R.; Chandramohan, V.P. Energy, Exergy, Economic and Environmental (4E) Analysis of Passive and Active-Modes Indirect Type Solar Dryers While Drying Guava Slices. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102250
    61. 61. Rasheed, L.A.; Yurchenko, A.V.; Mohammed, J.A.-K.; et al. The Effect of Automated Airflow Regulation on the Performance of an Indirect Solar Dryer: A Comparative Study. Russ. Phys. J. 2025, 68, 288–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-025-03431-1
    62. 62. Hidra, N.; Lehmad, M.; Doubabi, S.; et al. Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Remote Monitoring and Control System for Enhancing Hybrid Solar-Electric Dryer (HSED) Performance. Dry. Technol. 2025, 43, 1855–1878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2025.2553356
    ×