Geothermal Energy Potential in Cameroon: A Comprehensive Analysis and Outlook for Sustainable Energy Development

Edouard Mboumboue ORCID ,  François Ntep ORCID ,  B. Kossi Imbga ORCID ,  Inoussah Moungnutou Mfetoum ORCID ,  Donatien Njomo ORCID
    Received: 25 March 2026; Revised: 8 July 2026; Accepted: 14 July 2026; Published: 8 September 2026

    Abstract

    Cameroon possesses substantial geothermal potential associated with its position along the 1,600 km Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL), featuring geothermal gradients of 40–50 ℃/km and heat flow anomalies of 100–125 mW/m2 that significantly exceed continental averages. This comprehensive analysis synthesizes geological, geophysical, geochemical, and engineering data from some geothermal manifestations to quantify recoverable resources estimated at 500–1,000 MWe across Adamawa Plateau, Southwest Region, and Mount Cameroon volcanic complexes. Key sites including Meiganga (65–72 ℃ springs, 145 ℃ reservoir), Tignère (>40 ℃/km gradients), and Ekondo-Titi (80 ℃ springs, 160 ℃ reservoir) demonstrate medium-enthalpy suitability for binary Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) plants with 12% thermal efficiency. Detailed techno-economic modelling yields Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of 0.07–0.10 USD/kWh, competitive against diesel generation (0.25 USD/kWh) and approaching hydropower costs (0.07 USD/kWh), supported by Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 14–18% at conservative Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) of 0.10 USD/kWh. Despite promising fundamentals, development faces critical barriers including exploration data scarcity (<15 wells drilled), absence of geothermal legislation, and technical capacity limitations. From a sustainable development perspective, by dispensing Cameroon from dependence on hydrocarbon imports, geothermal energy positions Cameroon as Central Africa's geothermal leader, offering several advantages: energy security, local value creation (wealth, thousands of jobs, etc.), reduced greenhouse-gas emissions (displacement/avoidance of 5 MtCO₂/year), and support for industrial and agricultural purposes. The evidence available today justifies moving geothermal energy from a theoretical opportunity to a structured national development program.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. ARSEL. General Overview of the Energy Sector; Autorité de Régulation du Secteur de l'Électricité: Yaoundé, Cameroon, 2023. (in French)
    2. 2. World Bank. Scaling up Geothermal Energy in Developing Countries; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023.
    3. 3. ENEO. Annual Performance Report; Energy of Cameroon: Douala, Cameroon, 2025. (in French)
    4. 4. IRENA. Geothermal Direct-Use Opportunities in Africa; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2025.
    5. 5. DiPippo, R. Geothermal Power Generation: Developments and Innovation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
    6. 6. Ko, I.J.; Choe, T.G. Prediction of Groundwater Temperature Variation in Riverine Well for the Safe Operation of Groundwater Heat Pump (GWHP) System. Clean Energy Technol. 2025, 1, 41–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54963/cet.v1i2.2168
    7. 7. Investir au Cameroun. Electricity: Scatec Finalizes Two New 25–30 MW Solar Projects in Cameroon with IFC Financial Support. Available online: https://www.investiraucameroun.com/energie/1412-20107-electricite-scatec-peaufine-deux-nouveaux-projets-de-25-a-30-mw-de-solaire-au-cameroun-avec-l-appui-financier-de-la-sfi (accessed on 3 July 2025). (in French)
    8. 8. Déruelle, B.; Ngounouno, I.; Demaiffe, D. The “Cameroon Hot Line” (CHL): A Unique Example of Active Alkaline Intraplate Structure in Both Oceanic and Continental Lithospheres. C. R. Geosci. 2007, 339, 589–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.07.007
    9. 9. Mathieu, L. Quantifying Hydrothermal Alteration: A Review of Methods. Geosciences 2018, 8, 245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070245
    10. 10. Vishiti, A.; Armstrong, T.; Shemang, E.; et al. Hydrothermal Alteration of Basaltic Rocks at Eruptive Vents on Mount Cameroon Volcano, West Africa. Int. J. Geosci. 2018, 9, 513–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2018.99030
    11. 11. Nyaban, C.E.; Ndougsa-Mbarga, T.; Bikoro-Bi-Alou, M.; et al. Multi-Scale Analysis and Modelling of Aeromagnetic Data over the Bétaré-Oya Area in Eastern Cameroon, for Structural Evidence Investigations. Solid Earth 2021, 12, 785–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-785-2021
    12. 12. Meying, A.; Wassouo, B.W.E.; Gouet, D.; et al. Hydrogeophysical Investigation for Groundwater Resources from Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Self-Potential Data in the Méiganga Area, Adamawa, Cameroon. Int. J. Geophys. 2018, 2018, 2697585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2697585
    13. 13. Ntomb Biboum, E.O.; Lepatio Tchieg, S.A.; Fosso Téguia, M.E.E.; et al. Contribution of Gravity and Hydrogeological Implication to the Study of the Subsoil in the East Region (Cameroon). J. Geosci. Geomatics 2021, 9, 45–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/jgg-9-2-1
    14. 14. Gnamou, B.; Ilboudo, H.; Toé, W.; et al. Geochemical Mobility Associated to Gold and Base Metal Occurrences of Mangodara Sector, in Southern Burkina Faso, Banfora Greenstone Belts (West African Craton). Open J. Geol. 2023, 13, 1024–1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2023.1310044
    15. 15. Fournier, R.O. Chemical Geothermometers and Mixing Models for Geothermal Systems. Geothermics 1977, 5, 41–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(77)90007-4
    16. 16. Adams, A.N.; Wiens, D.A.; Nyblade, A.A.; et al. Lithospheric Instability and the Source of the Cameroon Volcanic Line: Evidence from Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity Tomography. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2015, 120, 1708–1727.
    17. 17. KenGen. Olkaria Geothermal Field: Binary Cycle Operations Report; Kenya Electricity Generating Company: Nairobi, Kenya, 2024.
    18. 18. Emekwi, P.L.; Mariita, N.O.; Kariuki, P.C. Structural Controls Analysis and Its Correlation with Geothermal Occurrence at Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC), Turkana, Kenya. Int. J. Geosci. 2024, 15, 231–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2024.153014
    19. 19. Mouzong, M.P.; Mfetoum, M.I.; Ngoh, K.S.; et al. Current Status, Future Prospects, and the Need for Geothermal Energy Exploration in Cameroon: Comprehensive Review. Geofluids 2023, 2023, 6168519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6168519
    20. 20. Elvis, B.W.W. Hydrogeophysical study of the Meiganga area (Adamawa, Cameroon) using a combination of geoelectrical methods (direct current and spontaneous potential) and satellite imagery. Available online: https://dicames.online/jspui/handle/20.500.12177/12752 (accessed on 30 June 2025). (in French)
    21. 21. Alsoudi, M.; Mukbel, M. Renewable Energy Resources in Yemen: Growth, Challenges, Potential Opportunities and Strategies. J. Power Energy Eng. 2025, 13, 27–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2025.139003
    22. 22. Hu, F.; Ducea, M.N.; Chapman, J.B.; et al. High Geothermal Gradients Facilitating Lithium Mineralization: Insights from the Ke’eryin–Taiyanghe Plutons, Central China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2025, 672, 119693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119693
    23. 23. Hadzari, N.H.M.; Nasir, F.M.; Rahim, S.L. Design Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle with Different Operating Parameters for Heat Recovery from Industrial Kiln. In Progress in Engineering Technology VI; Razak, T.A.A., Ismail, A.K., Öchsner, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81517-1_10
    24. 24. Nemzouea, P.N.N.; Keutchafo, N.A.K.; Tchouankoue, J.P. Geothermal Development in Cameroon. Eng. Therm. 2020, 19, 32–41.
    25. 25. Ngako, V.; Njonfang, E.; Aka, F.T.; et al. The North-South Paleozoic to Quaternary Trend of Alkaline Magmatism from Niger-Nigeria to Cameroon: Complex Interaction between Hotspots and Precambrian Faults. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2006, 45, 241–256.
    26. 26. Njonfang, E.; Ngako, V.; Kwekam, M.; et al. The Foumban-Bankim Calc-Alkaline Orthogneisses: Evidence of a Sheared Internal Zone of a Pan-African Active Margin. C. R. Geosci. 2006, 338, 606–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2006.03.016 (in French)
    27. 27. Ebinger, C.J.; Sleep, N.H. Cenozoic Magmatism throughout East Africa Resulting from Impact of a Single Plume. Nature 1998, 395, 788–791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/27417
    28. 28. Seghedi, I.; Downes, H.; Szakacs, A.; et al. Neogene Quaternary Magmatism and Geodynamics in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: A Synthesis. Lithos 2004, 72, 117–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2003.08.006
    29. 29. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; et al. Generation of Back-Arc Basins as Side Effect of Shortening Processes: Examples from the Central Mediterranean. Int. J. Geosci. 2014, 5, 1062–1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.510091
    30. 30. Fitton, J.G.; Dunlop, H.M. The Cameroon Line, West Africa, and Its Bearing on the Origin of Oceanic and Continental Alkali Basalt. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1985, 72, 23–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(85)90114-1
    31. 31. Tchuimegnie Ngongang, N.B.; Wagsong, M.P.N.; Owono, F.M.; et al. Mineralogy and Magmatic Processes of Cenozoic Intraplate Alkaline Volcanic Rocks of Bafang and Its Environs (Cameroon Volcanic Line, West Africa). Open J. Geol. 2021, 11, 210–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2021.116013
    32. 32. Marzoli, A.; Renne, P.R.; Piccirillo, E.M.; et al. Silicic Magmas from the Continental Cameroon Volcanic Line (Oku, Bambouto and Ngaoundere): 40Ar-39Ar Dates, Petrology, Sr-Nd-O Isotopes and Their Petrogenetic Significance. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1999, 135, 133–150.
    33. 33. Meyers, J.B.; Rosendahl, B.R.; Harrison, C.G.A.; et al. Deep-Imaging Seismic and Gravity Results from the Offshore Cameroon Volcanic Line, and Speculation of African Hotlines. Tectonophysics 1998, 284, 31–63.
    34. 34. Lima, E.; Tokita, H.; Hatanaka, H. Reservoir Engineering in Geothermal Fields. In Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology; Meyers, R., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_299-3
    35. 35. White, M.; Vasyliv, Y.; Beckers, K.; et al. Numerical Investigation of Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems in Deep Geothermal Reservoirs. Geothermics 2024, 116, 102852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102852
    36. 36. Njonfang, E.; Ngako, V.; Moreau, C.; et al. Restraining Bends in High Temperature Shear Zones: The Central Cameroon Shear Zone, Central Africa. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2008, 52, 9–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2008.03.002
    37. 37. Kahraman, M.; Cornwell, D.G.; Thompson, D.A.; et al. Crustal-Scale Shear Zones and Heterogeneous Structure beneath the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, Revealed by a High-Density Seismometer Array. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2015, 430, 129–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.08.014
    38. 38. Aydin, U.; Pamuk, E.; Ozer, C. Investigation of Soil Dynamic Characteristics at Seismic Stations Using H/V Spectral Ratio Method in Marmara Region, Turkey. Nat. Hazards 2021, 110, 587–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04959-4
    39. 39. Ibrahim, M.W. Geothermal Gradient Anomalies of Hydrocarbon Entrapment, UKCS Quadrants 35–54. In Proceedings of the European Petroleum Computer Conference, Aberdeen, UK, 15–17 March 1994; pp. 85–96.
    40. 40. Mao, X.; Li, K. Main Controlling Factors of Regional High Geothermal Anomaly. In Proceedings of the 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 12–14 February 2018.
    41. 41. Nono, A.; Déruelle, B.; Demaiffe, D.; et al. Tchabal Nganha Volcano in Adamawa (Cameroon): Petrology of a Continental Alkaline Lava Series. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1994, 60, 147–178.
    42. 42. Shariatipour, S.M.; Pickup, G.E.; Mackay, E.J. The Effect of Aquifer/Caprock Interface on Geological Storage of CO2. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 5544–5555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.588
    43. 43. Ziem à Bidias, L.A.; Moundi, A.; Takodjou Wambo, J.D. Transitional Basalts and Erruptive Dynamisms Around Nkoumelap Locality (West of the Bamoun Plateau, Cameroon Volcanic Line): Petrography and Volcanic Risks’ Evaluation. J. Geosci. Geomatics 2017, 5, 65–77.
    44. 44. Njeudjang, K.; Abate Essi, J.M.; Domra Kana, J.; et al. Gravity Investigation of the Cameroon Volcanic Line in Adamawa Region: Geothermal Features and Structural Control. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 165, 103809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103809
    45. 45. Eyike, A.; Nyam, F.; Basseka, C. Topography of the Moho Undulation in Cameroon from Gravity Data: Preliminary Insights into the Origin, the Age and the Structure of the Crust and the Upper Mantle across Cameroon and Adjacent Areas. Open J. Geol. 2018, 8, 65–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81005
    46. 46. Kendon, E.J.; Stratton, R.A.; Tucker, S. Enhanced Future Changes in Wet and Dry Extremes over Africa at Convection-Permitting Scale. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09776-9
    47. 47. Joel, P.K.; Louise-Clotilde, O.A.M.; Evariste, N.; et al. Identification of Geothermal Reservoirs in South Cameroon from a Combined Landsat 8 and AMT Data. Int. J. Geophys. 2022, 2022, 1324766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1324766
    48. 48. Ndongmo, G.; Koumetio, F.; Ngapgue, F.; et al. Characterization of Near Surface Intrusions in South-West Cameroon Zone Using Gravity Data: Mining and Geothermal Implications. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2023, 11, 268–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.119018
    49. 49. Ngoh, J.D.; Mbarga, T.N.; Mickus, K.; et al. Estimation of Curie Point Depth (CPD) across the Pan African Belt in Northern Cameroon from Aeromagnetic Data. Open J. Earthq. Res. 2020, 9, 217–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.93013
    50. 50. Abdel Zaher, M.; El-Qady, G.; Elbarbary, S. Geothermal Potentiality of Egypt: Review and Updated Status. In The Phanerozoic Geology and Natural Resources of Egypt; Hamimi, Z., Khozyem, H., Adatte, T., et al., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 637–648.
    51. 51. Abraham, E.; Okechukwu, P. Modeling Geothermal Energy Potential in the Ruwan-Zafi Hot Spring Region of Northeastern Nigeria Using High-Resolution Aeromagnetic Data. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2024, 10, 4361–4373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02023-1
    52. 52. Michaut, C.; Jaupart, C.; Bell, D.R. Transient Geotherms in Archean Continental Lithosphere: New Constraints on Thickness and Heat Production of the Subcontinental Lithospheric Mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004464
    53. 53. Clauser, C.; Huenges, E. Thermal Conductivity of Rocks and Minerals. In Rock Physics & Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 105–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/RF003p0105
    54. 54. Arola, T.; Okkonen, J.; Jokisalo, J. Groundwater Utilisation for Energy Production in the Nordic Environment: An Energy Simulation and Hydrogeological Modelling Approach. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2016, 8, 642–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.86053
    55. 55. Tanaka, A.; Okubo, Y.; Matsubayashi, O. Curie Point Depth Based on Spectrum Analysis of the Magnetic Anomaly Data in East and Southeast Asia. Tectonophysics 1999, 306, 461–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00072-4
    56. 56. Langemeyer, S.M.; Lowman, J.P.; Tackley, P.J. Global Mantle Convection Models Produce Transform Offsets along Divergent Plate Boundaries. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00139-1
    57. 57. Arnórsson, S.; Andrésdóttir, A. Processes Controlling the Distribution of Boron and Chlorine in Natural Waters in Iceland. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 4125–4146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00278-8
    58. 58. Giggenbach, W.F. Isotopic Shifts in Water from Geothermal and Hydrothermal Systems along Convergent Plate Boundaries and Their Origin. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1992, 113, 495–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(92)90127-H
    59. 59. Sanjuan, B.; Asmundsson, R.; Millot, R.; et al. Use of Two New Na/Li Geothermometric Relationships for Geothermal Fluids in Volcanic Environments. In Proceedings of the Goldschmidt Conference 2012, Montréal, QC, Canada, 24–29 June 2012.
    60. 60. Hayashi, K. Oxygen Isotope Study of Silica Sinter from the Osorezan Geothermal Field, Northeast Japan. Int. J. Geosci. 2013, 4, 1438–1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.410141
    61. 61. Jaupart, C.; Mareschal, J.-C. Heat Generation and Transport in the Earth; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010.
    62. 62. Turcotte, D.L.; Schubert, G. Geodynamics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442
    63. 63. Loke, M.H. Topographic Modelling in Resistivity Imaging Inversion. In Proceedings of the 62nd EAGE Conference & Technical Exhibition, Glasgow, Scotland, 29 May–2 June 2000.
    64. 64. Hart, R.M.; Ikard, S.J.; Hays, P.D.; et al. Effects of Climate and Land-Use Change on Thermal Springs Recharge—A System-Based Coupled Surface-Water and Groundwater-Flow Model for Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215045
    65. 65. Eissa, R. Identification of Different Shallow Foundations Using 3-D Electrical Resistivity Modeling. Iraqi Geol. J. 2022, 55, 111–120.
    66. 66. Constable, S.; Parker, R.L.; Constable, C. Occam’s Inversion: A Practical Algorithm for Generating Smooth Models from Electromagnetic Sounding Data. Geophysics 1987, 52, 289–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442303
    67. 67. Martínez‐Garzón, P.; Meier, M.-A.; Collettini, C.; et al. Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2025, 130, e2024JB029763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB029763
    68. 68. Gideon, Y.B. Petrography and Geochemical Characterization of Basement Rocks within Okene Metropolis, North Central Nigeria. Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 9, 36–48.
    69. 69. Adamu, L.M.; Umaru, A.O.; Aliyu, A.E.; et al. Geology, Geochemistry and Petrogenetic Studies of the Precambrian Basement Rocks around Jimgbe, Northcentral Nigeria. J. Min. Geol. 2021, 57, 229–240.
    70. 70. Ndikum, E.N.; Koumetio, F.; Kenfack, V.J.; et al. Gravity Study of the Douala Sub-Basin (Cameroon) Using Euler 3-D Deconvolution, Source Edge Detection (SED) and Special Function Analysis. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1176-y
    71. 71. Kamgang Chendjou, L.C.; Kenfack, J.V.; Tcheumenak Kouémo, J.; et al. Interpretation of Geological and Gravity Data from the Bamiléké Plateau (West-Cameroon): Implication for the Understanding of Its Underground Lithotectonic Geometry. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2024, 12, 283–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.129016
    72. 72. Elvis, B.W.W. Hydro-Geophysical Study of the Meiganga Zone (Adamaoua, Cameroon) by Combining Geo-Electrical Methods (Coutrant and Spontaneous Potential) and Satellite Imagery. PhD Thesis, Université de Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon, 2024.
    73. 73. O’Sullivan, M.J.; Pruess, K.; Lippmann, M.J. State of the Art of Geothermal Reservoir Simulation. Geothermics 2001, 30, 395–429.
    74. 74. Xu, W.; Xie, X.; Yi, S.; et al. Evaluation of Hot Dry Rock Reservoir Stimulation Based on Microseismic Monitoring Method: A Case Study of the Northern Jiangsu Basin. Front. Earth Sci. 2025, 13, 1688302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1688302
    75. 75. Dagdas, A.; Akkoyunlu, M.T.; Basaran, T. Performance Analysis of Supercritical Binary Geothermal Power. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2014, 7, 326839.
    76. 76. Lund, J.W. Geothermal Energy Utilization. In Renewable Energy Systems; Kaltschmitt, M., Themelis, N.J., Bronicki, L.Y., et al., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5820-3_231
    77. 77. Al-Zyoud, S. Geothermal Energy Utilization in Jordanian Deserts. Int. J. Geosci. 2019, 10, 906–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2019.1010051
    78. 78. Adepoju-Bello, A.A.; Ojomolade, O.O.; Ayoola, G.A.; et al. Quantitative Analysis of Some Toxic Metals in Domestic Water Obtained from Lagos Metropolis. Niger. J. Pharm. 2009, 42, 57–60.
    79. 79. Akoachere II, R.A.; Eyong, T.A.; Ngassam, M.-C.P.; et al. Evaluation of Trace Metals in Groundwater of Ekondo-Titi and Environs, Onshore Rio Del Rey, Cameroun. Open Access Libr. J. 2019, 6, e5791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105791
    80. 80. Mono, J.A.; Bouba, A.; Owono Amougou, O.U.I.; et al. Analysis of Aeromagnetic Data for Enhancing Geologic Features Using Filtering Techniques over the Congo Craton–Pan-African Belt Contact, Centre-East Cameroon. Int. J. Geophys. 2024, 2024, 4767612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4767612
    81. 81. Bear, J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1988.
    82. 82. Gudmundsson, J.S. Two-Phase Flow in Geothermal Wells. In Geothermal Reservoir Engineering; Okandan, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3691-1_6
    83. 83. Pud, D.; Treister, R.; Eisenberg, E. Sub-Grouping Healthy Subjects’ Sensitivity to Pain and Its Relationship to Personality Traits: Results of a Cluster Analysis. Am. J. Appl. Math. 2014, 5, 1705–1712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.511163
    84. 84. Pratama, H.B.; Saptadji, N.M. Study of Production-Injection Strategies for Sustainable Production in Geothermal Reservoir Two-Phase by Numerical Simulation. Indones. J. Geosci. 2020, 8, 25–38.
    85. 85. Pruess, K.; Oldenburg, C.M.; Moridis, G. TOUGH2 User’s Guide, Version 2; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL): Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/751729
    86. 86. Meacci, L. Modeling a Geothermal Field: A Not-Trivial Starter Kit. Open Access Libr. J. 2020, 7, e6836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106836
    87. 87. Muffler, P.; Cataldi, R. Methods for Regional Assessment of Geothermal Resources. Geothermics 1978, 7, 53–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(78)90002-0
    88. 88. Vieira, F.; Hamza, V. Advances in Assessment of Geothermal Resources of South America. Nat. Resour. 2014, 5, 897–913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2014.514077
    89. 89. Atrens, A.; Gurgenci, H.; Rudolph, V. CO₂ Thermosiphon for Competitive Geothermal Power Generation. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 553–557.
    90. 90. Al-Fakih, A.; Li, K. Study of Geothermal Energy Resources of Yemen for Electric Power Generation. In Proceedings of the GRC’s 42nd Annual Meeting & Expo, Reno, NV, USA, 14–17 October 2018.
    91. 91. Sanyal, S.K. Classification of Geothermal Systems—A Possible Scheme. In Proceedings of the 30th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA, 31 January–2 February 2005.
    92. 92. Khodayar, M.; Björnsson, S. Conventional Geothermal Systems and Unconventional Geothermal Developments: An Overview. Open J. Geol. 2024, 14, 196–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2024.142012
    93. 93. Kolie, B.; Elshkaki, A.; Sunahara, G. The Impact of the Energy Transition and Sustainable Development Goals on Mineral Resource Availability in Africa. Smart Grid Renew. Energy 2024, 15, 149–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2024.157010
    94. 94. Tester, J.; Blackwell, D.; Petty, S.; et al. The Future of Geothermal Energy: An Assessment of the Energy Supply Potential of Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS) for the United States. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA, 22–24 January 2007.
    95. 95. Terry-Short, L.A.; Owens, R.G.; Slade, P.D.; et al. Positive and Negative Perfectionism. Pers. Individ. Dif. 1995, 18, 663–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00192-U
    96. 96. IEA. The Future of Geothermal Energy. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-geothermal-energy (accessed on 14 June 2025).
    97. 97. Dobson, P.; Asanuma, H.; Huenges, E.; et al. Supercritical Geothermal Systems—A Review of Past Studies and Ongoing Research Activities. In Proceedings of the 41st Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA, 13–15 February 2017.
    98. 98. Rodriquez, K.; Intawong, A.; Hodgson, N.; et al. Fractured Basement—An Overlooked Play Type with Significant Potential from a Global Seismic Database; European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Bunnik, The Netherlands, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.35.7.89734
    ×