A Narrative Literature Review of the 2011 Joplin, Missouri Tornado: Myriad Lessons Learned from One of the Worst Tornadoes in U.S. History-Scilight

Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters

Article

A Narrative Literature Review of the 2011 Joplin, Missouri Tornado: Myriad Lessons Learned from One of the Worst Tornadoes in U.S. History

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/ptnd.v4i1.1052
Stimers, M., & Paul, B. K. (2025). A Narrative Literature Review of the 2011 Joplin, Missouri Tornado: Myriad Lessons Learned from One of the Worst Tornadoes in U.S. History. Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters, 4(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.54963/ptnd.v4i1.1052
Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025): In Progress
Copyright (c) 2025 Mitchel Stimers, Bimal Kanti Paul
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters (PTND)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Prevention and Treatment of Natural Disasters (PTND) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Mitchel Stimers

    Department of Geography, Park University, Parkville, MO 64152, USA
  • Bimal Kanti Paul

    Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA

We examined the impacts and lessons learned from the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, tornado, one of the most devastating tornadoes in U.S. history. The review covers various aspects, including vulnerability and resilience, building codes, preparedness, risk communication, damage assessment, economic impacts, and response and recovery strategies. Key findings highlight the role of building codes and structural integrity in mitigating damage, the importance of effective communication and preparedness in enhancing community response, and the significant influence of socioeconomic factors on recovery processes. Studies on community resilience emphasize the necessity of integrated approaches that combine engineering, social, and economic perspectives. The review also underscores the value of empirical data from building permit records, spatial‑temporal analyses, and economic models in understanding recovery trajectories. Contributions from interdisciplinary research provide insights into improving disaster preparedness, response strategies, and long‑term resilience. The analysis offers valuable lessons for policymakers, emergency management officials, and urban planners, aiming to enhance resilience and reduce vulnerability to future tornadoes and other natural disasters. The review’s findings suggest that proactive planning, robust building practices, and effective communication are crucial for fostering resilient communities capable of withstanding and recovering from severe weather events.

Keywords:

Joplin Tornado Tornadoes Tornado Recovery Community Recovery Disaster Recovery

References

  1. Houston, J.B.; Franken, N.J. Disaster interpersonal communication and posttraumatic stress following the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, tornado. J. Loss Trauma 2015, 20, 195–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2013.848614
  2. Egnew, A.C.; Roueche, D.B.; Prevatt, D.O. Linking building attributes and tornado vulnerability using a logistic regression model. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2018, 19, 04018017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000305
  3. Houston, J.B.; Spialek, M.L.; First, J.; et al. Individual perceptions of community resilience following the 2011 Joplin tornado. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2017, 25, 354–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12171
  4. Langan, J.; Palmer, J.L.; Christopher, K.; et al. Joplin tornado survivors, hospital employees and community members: Reflections of resilience and acknowledgment of pain. Health Emerg. Disaster Nurs. 2017, 4, 57–65. http://doi.org/10.24298/hedn.2016-0004
  5. Wang, W.L.; van de Lindt, J.W.; Hartman, B.; et al. Determination of individual building performance targets to achieve community-level social and economic resilience metrics. J. Struct. Eng. 2022, 148, 04022045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003338
  6. Wang, W.L.; van de Lindt, J.W. Quantitative modeling of residential building disaster recovery and effects of pre-and post-event policies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 59, 102259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102259
  7. Wang, W.L.; van de Lindt, J.W.; Rosenheim, N.; et al. Effect of residential building wind retrofits on social and economic community-level resilience metrics. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2021, 27, 04021034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000642
  8. Abdelhady, A.; Subgranon, A.; Nofal, O. Editorial: Recent advances in risk and community resilience analysis against windstorms. Front. Built Environ. 2023, 9, 1204119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1204119
  9. Smith, T.; Perotin, M.; Walsh, E. Enhancing tornado performance of critical facilities: Findings and recommendations of FEMA’s mitigation assessment team. In Structures in Congress 2012; Carrato, J., Burns, J., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 977–988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.087
  10. Coulbourne, W.L.; Miller, J. Performance of school buildings in the Joplin, MO, tornado. In Structures in Congress 2012; Carrato, J., Burns, J., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 989–998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.088
  11. Dao, T.; Graettinger, A.; Alfano, C.; et al. Failure progression analysis of observed residential structural damage within a tornado wind field. In Structures in Congress 2012; Carrato, J., Burns, J., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 1448–1459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413357.128
  12. Prevatt, D.O.; Coulbourne, W.; Graettinger, A.J.; et al. Joplin, Missouri, Tornado of May 22, 2011: Structural Damage Survey and Case for Tornado-Resilient Building Codes; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412503
  13. Prevatt, D.O.; van de Lindt, J.W.; Back, E.; et al. Making the case for improved structural design: Tornado outbreaks of 2011. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2012, 12, 254–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000192
  14. Prevatt, D.O.; Roueche, D.B.; van de Lindt, J.W.; et al. Building damage observations and EF classifications from the Tuscaloosa, AL, and Joplin, MO, tornadoes. In Structures Congress 2012; Carrato, J., Burns, J., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 999–1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.089
  15. Roueche, D.; Prevatt, D. Residential damage patterns following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO Tornadoes. J. Disaster Res. 2013, 8, 1061–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20965/JDR.2013.P1061
  16. Paul, B.K.; Stimers, M.J.; Caldas, M. Predictors for survivor responses to the 2011 Joplin, MO, USA, Tornado warning. Disasters 2014, 39, 108–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12087
  17. Paul, B.K.; Stimers, M.J. Safety measures after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado. Geogr. Rev. 2015, 105, 199–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12065.x
  18. Kuligowski, E.D.; Kimball, A. Alerting under Imminent Threat: Guidance on Alerts Issued by Outdoor Siren and Short Message Alerting Systems; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2008
  19. Casteel, M.A. An empirical assessment of impact based tornado warnings on shelter in place decisions. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 30, 25–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.036
  20. Kuligowski, E.D.; Lombardo, F.T.; Phan, L.; et al. Final Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Technical Investigation of the May 22, 2011, Tornado in Joplin, Missouri; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.NCSTAR.3
  21. Luo, J.; Cong, Z.; Liang, D. Number of warning information sources and decision-making during tornadoes. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 48, 334–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.007
  22. Kuligowski, E.D. Field research to application: A study of human response to the 2011, Joplin tornado and its impact on alerts and warnings in the USA. Nat. Hazards 2020, 102, 1057–1076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03945-6
  23. Cong, Z.; Liang, D.; Luo, J. Family emergency preparedness plans in severe tornadoes. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 46, 89–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.020
  24. Cong, Z.; Luo, J.; Liang, D.; et al. Predictors for the number of warning information sources during tornadoes. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2017, 11, 168–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.97
  25. Cong, Z.; Liang, D.; Luo, J. Effectiveness of household emergency plans in violent tornadoes. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2021, 15, 677–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.129
  26. Peng, X.; Roueche, D.B.; Prevatt, D.O.; et al. An engineering-based approach to predict tornado-induced damage. In Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering; Gardoni, P., LaFave, J.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 311–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2
  27. Pilkington, S.F.; Mahmoud, H.; van de Lindt, J.W.; et al. Hindcasting loss and evaluating implications of track location for the 2011 Joplin, Missouri Tornado. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 2020, 6, 020902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046326
  28. Thomas, J.; Kareem, A.; Bowyer, K.W. Recent advances towards a robust, automated hurricane damage assessment from high-resolution images. In Advances in Hurricane Engineering: Learning from Our Past; Jones, C.P., Griffis, L.G., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2013b; pp. 806–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412626.069
  29. Thomas, J.; Kareem, A.; Bowyer, K.W. Automated poststorm damage classification of low-rise building roofing systems using high-resolution aerial imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013a, 52, 3851–3861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2277092
  30. Attary, N.; van de Lindt, J.W.; Mahmoud, H.; et al. Hindcasting community-level building damage for the 2011 Joplin EF5 tornado. Nat. Hazards 2018, 93, 1295–1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3353-5
  31. Attary, N.; Cutler, H.; Shields, M.; et al. The economic effects of financial relief delays following a natural disaster. Econ. Syst. Res. 2020, 32, 351–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1713729
  32. Attary, N.; van de Lindt, J.W.; Mahmoud, H.; et al. Hindcasting community-level damage to the interdependent buildings and electric power network after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2019, 20, 04018027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000317
  33. Karstens, C.D.; Gallus, W.A.; Lee, B.D.; et al. Analysis of tornado-induced tree fall using aerial photography from the Joplin, Missouri, and Tuscaloosa–Birmingham, Alabama, tornadoes of 2011. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2013, 52, 1049–1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0206.1
  34. Mason, A.M.; Drew, S.; Weaver, D. Managing crisis-induced uncertainty: First responder experiences from the 2011 Joplin-Duquesne tornado. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 23, 231–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.012
  35. Abramson, D.M.; Culp, D. At the Crossroads of Long-Term Recovery: Joplin, Missouri Six Months After the May 22, 2011 Tornado; National Center for Disaster Preparedness, Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  36. Nguyen, M.T.; Kitamoto, A.; Nguyen, T.T. Tsum4act: A framework for retrieving and summarizing actionable tweets during a disaster for reaction. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 64–75.
  37. Arendt, L.A. Joplin tornado recovery. In Case Studies in Disaster Recovery; Kushma, J., Slick, J., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2023; pp. 145–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809574-4.00007-0
  38. Smith, D.J.; Sutter, D. Response and recovery after the Joplin tornado: Lessons applied and lessons learned. Indep. Rev. 2013, 18, 165–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24563306
  39. Coles, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhuang, J. Partnership behavior in disaster relief operations: A case study comparison of the responses to the tornado in Joplin, Missouri and Hurricane Sandy along the Jersey Coast. Nat. Hazards 2016, 84, 625–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2445-3
  40. Grube, L.E.; Storr, V.H. Embedded entrepreneurs and post-disaster community recovery. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2018, 30, 800–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1457084
  41. Richmond, J.L. Preventing post-disaster population losses and recovery policy. J. Emerg. Manag. 2021, 19, 240–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0580
  42. Richmond, J.L.; Knight, C. Partnerships and Collaboration: Working Together to Build and Achieve Disaster Recovery. J. Glob. Aware. 2021, 2, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24073/jga/2/02/08
  43. Pilkington, S.F.; Curtis, A.; Mahmoud, H.; et al. Preliminary documented recovery patterns and observations from video cataloged data of the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2021, 22, 05020015. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000425
  44. Stimers, M.J.; Paul, B.K. Visualizing the 22 May 2011 Joplin, Missouri, tornado path using building permit data. Nat. Hazards 2022, 115, 146–1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05602-6
  45. Stimers, M.J.; Lenagala, S.K.; Haddock, B.H.; et al. Space-time clustering with the spatial scan statistic in SaTScan applied to building permit data following the 22 May 2011 Joplin, Missouri EF-5 tornado. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 2022, 13, 962–973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00456-9
  46. Kates, R.W. Major insights: A summary and recommendations. In Reconstruction Following Disaster; Haas, J.E., Kates, R.W., Bowden, M.J., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; pp. 261–293.
  47. Dinger, J.; Conger, M.J.; Bustamante, C.V. I am Joplin: Community identity and entrepreneurship after natural disasters. Front. Entrep. Res. 2012, 32, 3.
  48. Pilkington, S.F.; Mahmoud, H. Update article: Applicability of artificial neural networks to integrate socio-technical drivers of buildings recovery following extreme wind events. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021, 8, 211014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211014
  49. Aghababaei, M.; Koliou, M.; Pilkington, S.; et al. Validation of time-dependent repair recovery of the building stock following the 2011 Joplin Tornado. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2020, 21, 04020038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000408
  50. Paul, B.K.; Stimers, M.J. Exploring probable reasons for record fatalities: The case of the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado. Nat. Hazards 2012, 64, 1511–1526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0313-3
  51. Curtis, A.; Fagan, W.F. Capturing damage assessment with a spatial video: An example of a building and street-scale analysis of tornado-related mortality in Joplin, Missouri, 2011. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2013, 103, 1522–1538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.784098
  52. Paul, B.K.; Stimers, M.J. Analyzing the 2011 Joplin Tornado mortality: Deaths by interpolated damage zones and location of victims. Weather Clim. Soc. 2014, 6, 161–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00022.1
  53. Paul, B.K.; Stimers, M.J. Can elevation be associated with the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado fatalities? An empirical study. J. Geogr. Nat. Disasters 2017, 7, 202–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000202
  54. Avitzur, O. When a disaster hits: How neurologists can prepare. Neurol. Today 2011, 11, 6–7.
  55. Barbe, D. The Joplin tornado: Recovery one year later. Mo Med. 2012, 109, 172–174.
  56. Charney, R.; Rebmann, T.; Flood, R.G. Working after a tornado: A survey of hospital personnel in Joplin, Missouri. Biosecur. Bioterror. 2014, 12, 190–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2014.0010
  57. Houston, J.B.; Spialek, M.L.; Stevens, J.; et al. 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado experience, mental health reactions, and service utilization: Cross-sectional assessments at approximately 6 months and 2.5 years post-event. PLoS Curr. 2015, 7, ecurrents.dis.18ca227647291525ce3415bec1406aa5.
  58. Moulton, S.M. How to remember: The interplay of memory and identity formation in post-disaster communities. Hum. Organ. 2015, 74, 319–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.4.319
  59. Brown, J.S. Predicting connectedness with nature among survivors of the Joplin tornado. Ecopsychology 2017, 9, 193–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0007
  60. First, J.M.; First, N.; Stevens, J.; et al. Post-traumatic growth 2.5 years after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado. J. Fam. Soc. Work 2018, 21, 5–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2017.1402529
  61. Bigelow, R. 2011 Tornado in Joplin, MO. In Disaster Mental Health Case Studies; Halpern, J., Nitza, A., Vermeulen, K., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 51–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351252263
  62. Huff, C.J. Self-care in the aftermath of crisis: Learning to deal with “the best and the worst of myself” following a killer tornado in his school system. Sch. Adm. 2020, 8–13.
  63. First, J.M.; Carnahan, M.; Yu, M.; et al. Recovering from tornado brain’: A qualitative analysis of long-term needs after one of the deadliest tornadoes in US history. Clin. Soc. Work J. 2024, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-024-00926-1
  64. Kanter, R.K.; Abramson, D. School interventions after the Joplin tornado. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2014, 29, 214–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X14000181
  65. Adams, Z.W.; Danielson, C.K.; Sumner, J.A.; et al. Comorbidity of PTSD, major depression, and substance use disorder among adolescent victims of the spring 2011 tornadoes in Alabama and Joplin, Missouri. Psychiatry 2015, 78, 170–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2015.1051448
  66. Hambrick, E.P.; Vernberg, E.M.; Greenhoot, A.F.; et al. Recalling a devastating tornado: Qualities of child recollections and associations with mental health symptoms. J. Child Adolesc. Trauma 2018, 11, 227–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-017-0199-z
  67. Christopher, K.E.; Kitsantas, P.; Spooner, K.K.; et al. Implications of prenatal exposure to the spring 2011 Alabama and Missouri tornadoes on birth outcomes. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2019, 13, 279–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2018.55
  68. Etienne, K.; Gillece, J.; Hilsabeck, R.; et al. Whole genome sequence typing to investigate the Apophysomyces outbreak following a tornado in Joplin, Missouri, 2011. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049989
  69. Fanfair, R.N.; Benedict, K.; Bos, J.; et al. Necrotizing cutaneous mucormycosis after a tornado in Joplin, Missouri, in 2011. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2214–2225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1204781
  70. Weinhold, B. Rare fungal illness follows tornado. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, a116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.121-a116
  71. Benedict, K.; Adebanjo, T.; Harris, J.; et al. Notes from the field: Fatal fungal soft-tissue infections after a tornado-Joplin, Missouri, 2011. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011, 60, 992.