Strategic Governance Models for Scaling Clean Energy Startups in Emerging Economies: A Multi‑Stakeholder Systems Perspective

Clean Energy Technologies

Research Article

Strategic Governance Models for Scaling Clean Energy Startups in Emerging Economies: A Multi‑Stakeholder Systems Perspective

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/cet.v1i1.1480
Lakhwani, T. S. (2025). Strategic Governance Models for Scaling Clean Energy Startups in Emerging Economies: A Multi‑Stakeholder Systems Perspective. Clean Energy Technologies, 1(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.54963/cet.v1i1.1480
Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025)
Copyright (c) 2025 Tejinder Singh Lakhwani
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Clean Energy Technologies (CET)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Clean Energy Technologies (CET) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Tejinder Singh Lakhwani

    School of Management and Entrepreneurship, IIT Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342030, India

Received: 10 December 2024 | Revised: 25 January 2025 | Accepted: 1 February 2025 | Published Online: 11 February 2025

This study proposes a strategic governance framework to accelerate the scalable deployment of clean energy startups in emerging economies. Startups in solar, hydrogen, storage, and smart grid technologies play a vital role in advancing energy transitions. However, in regions such as India, Nigeria, and Brazil, these ventures face systemic barriers including fragmented policies, ϐinancing gaps, and limited institutional coordination. This research integrates stakeholder ecosystem mapping, multi‑level governance theory, and innovation helix models with simulation‑based scenario analysis to address these challenges. Using System Dynamics (SD) and Agent‑Based Modeling (ABM), the study evaluates three governance scenarios: centralized, decentralized, and public–private partnership (PPP) across key performance indicators: startup survival rate, scaling velocity, policy responsiveness, and stakeholder alignment. Case insights inform the modeling logic and highlight trade‑offs across governance types. Findings suggest that PPP‑based models offer the most balanced performance, combining scalability with institutional adaptability, while decentralized models support local innovation but require stronger systemic integration. Centralized governance, though stable, risks stifling entrepreneurship. This research contributes to a simulation‑informed governance framework that can guide clean energy policy design, startup ecosystem development, and adaptive regulation in resource‑constrained settings. It also provides a transferable foundation for future empirical studies and potential application to climate‑tech entrepreneurship and carbon credit systems.

Keywords:

Clean Energy Startups Governance Models Emerging Economies System Dynamics Policy Simulation Public–Private Partnerships

References

  1. Meckling, J., Galeazzi, C., Shears, E., et al., 2022. Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies. Nature energy. 7(9), 876–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01117-3
  2. Sovacool, B.K., Hess, D.J., Cantoni, R., 2021. Energy transitions from the cradle to the grave: a meta-theoretical framework integrating responsible innovation, social practices, and energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science. 75, 102027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102027
  3. Van den Heuvel, M., Popp, D., 2023. The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: Lessons from the first cleantech bubble. Energy Economics. 124, 106877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106877
  4. Semieniuk, G., Coronado, J.A., Mazzucato, M., 2021. Heterogeneous investors, scale economies and the commercialisation of innovative renewable energy technologies. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/sites/bartlett/files/wp2021-11_heterogenous_investors_15_dec.pdf (cited 4 January 2025).
  5. Singh, A.K., Kumar, V.P., Krishnaraj, L., 2022. Emerging technology trends in the C&I rooftop solar market in India: Case study on datacentre–Retrofit with BIPV by U-Solar. Solar Energy. 238, 203–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.033
  6. Cao, Z., Shi, X., 2021. A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics. 57, 75–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
  7. Hofbauer, L., McDowall, W., Pye, S., 2022. Challenges and opportunities for energy system modelling to foster multi-level governance of energy transitions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 161, 112330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112330
  8. Koster, A.M., Anderies, J.M., 2013. Institutional factors that determine energy transitions: A comparative case study approach. In: Michalena, E., Hills, J.M. (eds.). Renewable energy governance: Complexities and challenges. Springer: London, UK. pp. 33–61.
  9. Dong, F., Li, Y., Gao, Y., et al., 2022. Energy transition and carbon neutrality: Exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 177, 106002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106002
  10. Ringel, M., Bruch, N., Knodt, M., 2021. Is clean energy contested? Exploring which issues matter to stakeholders in the European Green Deal. Energy Research & Social Science. 77, 102083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102083
  11. Barile, S., Simone, C., Iandolo, F., et al., 2022. Platform-based innovation ecosystems: Entering new markets through holographic strategies. Industrial Marketing Management. 105, 467–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.07.003
  12. Lerman, L.V., Gerstlberger, W., Lima, M.F., et al., 2021. How governments, universities, and companies contribute to renewable energy development? A municipal innovation policy perspective of the triple helix. Energy Research & Social Science. 71, 101854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101854
  13. Bulmer, E., Yáñez-Araque, B., 2023. Tackling climate change through multi-stakeholder partnerships: Promoting SDG 17 to combat climate change. Energies. 16(9), 3777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093777
  14. Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F., Grigoroudis, E., 2022. Helix trilogy: The triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 13(3), 2272–2301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00813-x
  15. Hashemizadeh, A., Ju, Y., Abadi, F.Z.B., 2024. Policy design for renewable energy development based on government support: A system dynamics model. Applied Energy. 376, 124331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124331
  16. Vuthi, P., Peters, I., Sudeikat, J., 2022. Agent-based modeling (ABM) for urban neighborhood energy systems: literature review and proposal for an all integrative ABM approach. Energy Informatics. 5(Suppl 4), 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-022-00247-y
  17. Mahajan, R., Bandyopadhyay, K.R., 2021. Women entrepreneurship and sustainable development: select case studies from the sustainable energy sector. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 15(1), 42–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-11-2020-0184
  18. Nepal, R., Phoumin, H., Khatri, A., 2021. Green technological development and deployment in the association of Southeast Asian economies (ASEAN) at crossroads or roundabout? Sustainability. 13(2), 758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020758
  19. Raby, S., Hart, M., Harney, B., 2022. In search of the next growth episode: How firms catalyse and sustain periods of high growth. International Small Business Journal. 40(6), 671–683. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426221108631
  20. Shkarupa, O., Hernández, V.E.G., Zhukova, T., et al., 2021. Managing the key factors of green energy start-ups. International Journal of Global Energy Issues. 43(2–3), 211–227.
  21. Fleta‐Asín, J., Muñoz, F., 2021. Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment. Sustainable Development. 29(4), 653–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2165
  22. Moner-Girona, M., Bender, A., Becker, W., et al., 2021. A multidimensional high-resolution assessment approach to boost decentralised energy investments in Sub-Saharan Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 148, 111282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111282
  23. Werner, D., Lazaro, L.L.B., 2023. The policy dimension of energy transition: The Brazilian case in promoting renewable energies (2000–2022). Energy Policy. 175, 113480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113480
  24. Jiang, Y., 2023. Financing water investment for global sustainable development: Challenges, innovation, and governance strategies. Sustainable Development. 31(2), 600–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2412
  25. McCauley, D., Ramasar, V., Heffron, R.J., et al., 2019. Energy justice in the transition to low-carbon energy systems: Exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research. Applied Energy. 233–234, 916–921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.005
  26. Ohlhorst, D., 2015. Germany’s energy transition policy between national targets and decentralized responsibilities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 12(4), 303–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2015.1125373
  27. Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., Ozturk, I., et al., 2023. Dynamic and threshold effects of energy transition and environmental governance on green growth in COP26 framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 179, 113296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113296
  28. Monye, S.I., Nwankwo, S.O., Ikumapayi, O.M., et al., 2024. Green Hydrogen Energy: An Enabling Tool for the Economy of Power Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of 2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable Development Goals (SEB4SDG), Omu-Aran, Nigeria, 2–4 April 2024. pp. 1–8.
  29. Khezri, M., Hasan, Q.M., 2024. Exploring the impacts of entrepreneurship indices on renewable energy mix: A cross-country study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 199, 114539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114539
  30. Nguyen, H.T., Nanyaro, C.A., 2024. Predict the success of clean energy startups using a machine learning approach [Master's Thesis]. Oslo, Norway: Handelshøyskolen BI.