The Dual Transition of Electrical Switchgear: Navigating SF6 Alternatives and the Rise of Predictive Maintenance

New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

The Dual Transition of Electrical Switchgear: Navigating SF6 Alternatives and the Rise of Predictive Maintenance

Alhijazi, A., Diab, S., & Adam, A. (2026). The Dual Transition of Electrical Switchgear: Navigating SF6 Alternatives and the Rise of Predictive Maintenance. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 5(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v5i1.2306

Authors

  • Ayman Alhijazi

    Faculty of Mechatronics Engineering, Al‑Shamal Private University, Sarmadā , Idlib, Syria
  • Samer Diab

    Engineering Department, Al‑Zaytoonah International University, Azaaz, Aleppo, Syria
  • Adil Adam

    Engineering Department, Al‑Zaytoonah International University, Azaaz, Aleppo, Syria

Received: 19 January 2026; Revised: 18 February 2026; Accepted: 24 February 2026; Published: 13 March 2026

Electric switchgear serves as the backbone of any power system; it protects, controls, and isolates electrical circuits. For decades, Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) gas has been the insulating and quenching medium of choice. SF6 gas has great dielectric properties, making SF6 gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) compact and highly dependable. However, SF6 gas is highly detrimental to the environment, having a global warming potential of 22,800 times that of CO2. This makes it imperative that SF6 gas be phased out. At the same time, the rapidly developing complexity of power grids has outpaced the time-based maintenance systems. This article provides a summary of key research to examine the important changes that must be made when addressing the phasing out of SF6 gas and the alternatives for medium and high voltage applications. The article also addresses the shift from time-based maintenance to predictive and condition-based maintenance, as well as the impact of advanced analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML) on the future reliability and efficiency of switchgear. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of the emerging patterns and the need for sustainable and resilient electrical systems. Overall, the discussion highlights the need to prepare for innovation in the industry, as well as the need for sustainable and flexible electrical systems. Meeting these challenges will both reduce negative ecological impacts and protect the future viability of the network systems for power distribution.

Keywords:

Electric Switchgear SF6 (Sulfur Hexafluoride) Predictive Maintenance Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine Learning (ML) Gas‑Insulated Switchgear

References

  1. Subramaniam, A.; Sahoo, A.; Manohar, S.S.; et al. Switchgear Condition Assessment and Lifecycle Management: Standards, Failure Statistics, Condition Assessment, Partial Discharge Analysis, Maintenance Approaches, and Future Trends. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2021, 37, 27–41.
  2. Kieffel, Y.; Biquez, F. SF6 Alternative Development for High Voltage Switchgears. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), Seattle, WA, USA, 7–10 June 2015; pp. 379–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACACT.2014.7223577
  3. European Commission. Report from the Commission Assessing the Availability of Alternatives to Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases in Switchgear and Related Equipment, Including Medium-Voltage Secondary Switchgear; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
  4. Hopf, A.; Britton, J.A.; Rossner, M.; et al. Dielectric Strength of SF6 Substitutes, Alternative Insulation Gases and PFC-Gas-Mixtures. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), Baltimore, MD, USA, 11–14 June 2017; pp. 209–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EIC.2017.8004635
  5. Negri, V.; Iadarola, G.; Mingotti, A.; et al. Predictive Maintenance Based on Artificial Neural Network for MV Switchgears. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 35448–35457.
  6. Billen, P.; Maes, B.; Larrain, M.; et al. Replacing SF6 in Electrical Gas-Insulated Switchgear: Technological Alternatives and Potential Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Savings in an EU-28 Perspective. Energies 2020, 13, 1807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071807
  7. Alahmad, A.; Kacar, F.; Uzunogl, C.P. Optimum Design of an 18-Pulse Phase Shifting Autotransformer Rectifier to Improve the Power Quality of Cascaded H-Bridge Motor Driver. Elektron. Elektrotech. 2023, 29, 12–18.
  8. Rabie, M.; Franck, C.M. Computational Screening of New High Voltage Insulation Gases with Low Global Warming Potential. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 296–302.
  9. Rahmani-Sane, G.; Azad, S.; Ameli, M.T.; et al. The Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin in Power Systems: An In-Depth Review. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 108573–108608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3580340
  10. Alahmad, A.; Kacar, F.; Uzunoğlu, C. Comprehensive Analysis of DC Link Capacitors Used in Cascaded H-Bridge Motor Driver. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2024, 1, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2024.2357262
  11. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62271-1: High-Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear—Part 1: Common Specifications; IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  12. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62271-4: High-Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear—Part 4: Handling Procedures for Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) and Its Mixtures; IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  13. Talha, M.A.; Rashed, R.R.; Ahmed, S.; et al. IoT-Based Real-Time Monitoring and Control System for Distribution Substation. In Proceedings of the 2023 10th IEEE International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, 13–15 December 2023; pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS60393.2023.10428721
  14. Qiao, X.; Ming, Y.; Xu, K.; et al. Aging of Polymeric Insulators under Various Conditions and Environments: Another Look. Energies 2022, 15, 8809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238809
  15. Khalyasmaa, A.I.; Stepanova, A.I.; Eroshenko, S.A.; et al. Review of the Digital Twin Technology Applications for Electrical Equipment Lifecycle Management. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061315
  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023.
  17. Adam, A.; Kacar, F.; Mastorakis, N. Enhancement Design of Eleven-Level Cascaded H-Bridge Motor Driver Application. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2025, 123, 110179.
  18. Diab, S.; Adam, A. Design and Modelling of Solar Water Pumping System for Irrigation in Syria, Damascus. Energy Storage Convers. 2025, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/esc3849
  19. Khattak, I.M.; Khan, F.; Ali, S.Z.; et al. Characteristics Investigation of R407C in High Voltage Applications as an Alternative to SF6. Results Eng. 2025, 27, 106627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106627
  20. Aslan, E.; Özüpak, Y.; Alpsalaz, F.; et al. A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Power Transformer Failures Using Internet of Things-Based Monitoring and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 113618–113633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3583773
  21. Guo, Z.; Li, X.; Li, B.; et al. Dielectric Properties of C5-PFK Mixtures as a Possible SF6 Substitute for MV Power Equipment. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 129–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2018.007675
  22. Khan, Q.; Refaat, S.S.; Abu-Rub, H.; et al. Partial Discharge Detection and Diagnosis in Gas Insulated Switchgear: State of the Art. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2019, 35, 16–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MEI.2019.8735667
  23. Togay, A.; Duzkaya, H.; Dogan, B. Life Cycle Assessment of Medium Voltage SF6-Free Switchgears: A Comparative Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2025 12th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICEEE), Istanbul, Turkey, 24–26 September 2025; pp. 65–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE67194.2025.11261959
  24. Kuffel, E.; Zaengl, W.S.; Kuffel, J. High Voltage Engineering Fundamentals, 2nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2000.
  25. Liu, Z.; Blasch, E.; Liao, M.; et al. Digital Twin for Predictive Maintenance. Proc. SPIE 2023, 12489, 1248907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2660270
  26. Vaish, R.; Dwivedi, U.; Tewari, S.; et al. Machine learning applications in power system fault diagnosis: Research advancements and perspectives. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2021, 106, 104504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104504
  27. Kielmann, F.; Kaufhold, M. Evaluation analysis of thermal ageing in insulation systems of electrical machines—a historical review. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 2010, 17, 1373–1377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2010.5595538
  28. Liu, M.; Yao, X.; Zhang, J.; et al. Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Machining Tools by IABC-BPNN in Dry Milling Operations. Sensors 2020, 20, 4657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174657
  29. International Energy Agency (IEA). Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (2023 Update); IEA Publications: Paris, France, 2023.
  30. Coban, H.H.; Aydin, M.S.; Bayram, A.; et al. Data-Driven Analysis of Non-Technical Losses in Low-Voltage Networks: A Case Study of Bartin, Turkey. In Enhancing Renewable Energy Systems with Generative AI; Ramírez, J., Kumar, A., Rathore, P., Eds.; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2026; pp. 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4272-6.ch001