The Relationship between Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth in Egypt

New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

The Relationship between Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth in Egypt

Mohamed, M., Helmy, O., & Ibrahiem, D. M. (2025). The Relationship between Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth in Egypt. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 4(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v4i2.1316

Authors

  • Manar Mohamed

    Depatment of Financial Economics, School of Business Administration, Ahram Canadian University, Giza 12613, Egypt
  • Omneia Helmy

    Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
  • Dalia M. Ibrahiem

    Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt

Received: 2 October 2025; Revised: 28 October 2025; Accepted: 31 October 2025; Published: 18 November 2025

Given the increasing reliance on natural gas as a primary energy source in Egypt and its pivotal role in supporting industrial production and electricity generation, understanding the relationship between natural gas consumption and economic growth is of great importance. This is particularly crucial in the context of energy policy formulation, sustainable development, and efficient resource allocation. This study investigates the causal nexus between natural gas consumption and economic growth in Egypt during the period from 1988 to 2018. The primary aim is to determine whether economic growth drives gas consumption or vice versa, which carries significant implications for energy policy and sustainable development planning. The research adopts the Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach to analyze long-term relationships, while the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) Granger causality test is employed to explore short-run and long-run causal dynamics between the variables. The empirical findings reveal a unidirectional causality running from economic growth to natural gas consumption in the short run, supporting the conservation hypothesis. This suggests that economic expansion leads to increased gas consumption, but not the other way around. In contrast, no causality is detected in the long run, aligning with the neutrality hypothesis, which implies that natural gas consumption does not significantly influence long-term economic growth.

Keywords:

Natural Gas Consumption Economic Growth ARDL VECM Granger Causality

References

  1. Christodoulakis, N.M.; Kalyvitis, S.C.; Lalas, D.P.; Pesmajoglou, S. Forecasting energy consumption and energy related CO₂ emissions in Greece: an evaluation of the consequences of the Community Support Framework II and natural gas penetration. Energy Econ. 2000, 22, 395–422.
  2. World Bank. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KN (accessed on 25 June 2025).
  3. British Petroleum. Statistical Review of World Energy; BP: London, UK, 2019.
  4. Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company (EGAS). Annual Report 2018/2019; EGAS: Cairo, Egypt, 2019. Available online: https://www.egas.com.eg/annual-reports/2019 (accessed on 25 June 2025).
  5. Eltis, W. The classical theory of economic growth. In The Classical Theory of Economic Growth; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2000; pp. 310–338.
  6. Barbier, E.B. Economics, Natural-Resource Scarcity and Development (Routledge Revivals): Conventional and Alternative Views; Routledge: London, UK, 2013.
  7. Sharipov, I. Contemporary economic growth models and theories: A literature review. CES Working Papers 2015, 7, 759.
  8. Solow, R.M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 1956, 70, 65–94.
  9. Victor, P.A. Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory. Ecol. Econ. 1991, 4, 191–213.
  10. Benchekroun, H.; Withagen, C. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources: A complete characterization. Resour. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 612–636.
  11. Dasgupta, P.; Heal, G. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1974, 41, 3–28.
  12. Solow, R.M. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1974, 41, 29–45.
  13. Stiglitz, J. Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1974, 41, 123–137.
  14. Hartwick, J.M. Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am. Ec. Rev. 1977, 67, 972–974.
  15. Cleveland, C.J. Biophysical economics: historical perspective and current research trends. Ecol. Modell. 1987, 38, 47–73.
  16. Van den Bergh, J.C. Ecol. Econ.: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Reg. Environ. Change 2001, 2, 13–23.
  17. Neumayer, E. Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2003.
  18. Bay, A.G.N.M.; Hong, L. Dynamics of the natural gas industry and economic growth in Mozambique. J. Energy Eng. 2017, 5, 68–77.
  19. Gerelmaa, L.; Kotani, K. Further investigation of natural resources and economic growth: do natural resources depress economic growth?. Resour. Policy 2016, 50, 312–321.
  20. Apergis, N.; Payne, J.E. Energy consumption and growth in South America: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ. 2010, 32, 1421–1426.
  21. Bildirici, M.E.; Bakirtas, T. The relationship among oil, natural gas and coal consumption and economic growth in BRICTS countries. Energy 2014, 65, 134–144.
  22. Apergis, N.; Payne, J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 211–216.
  23. Apergis, N.; Payne, J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 641–647.
  24. Lee, C.C. Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Econ. 2005, 27, 415–427.
  25. Oh, W.; Lee, K. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970–1999. Energy Econ. 2004, 26, 51–59.
  26. Chang, C.C. A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 3533–3537.
  27. Işik, C. Natural gas consumption and economic growth in Turkey: a bound test approach. J. Energy Syst. 2010, 1, 441–456.
  28. Yang, H.Y. A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Econ. 2000, 22, 309–317.
  29. Narayan, P.K.; Popp, S. The energy consumption-real GDP nexus revisited: Empirical evidence from 93 countries. Econ. Model. 2012, 29, 303–308.
  30. Sharaf, M.F. Energy consumption and economic growth in Egypt: A disaggregated causality analysis with structural breaks. Top. Middle East. Afr. Econ. 2016, 18, 61–86.
  31. Erdal, G.; Erdal, H.; Esengün, K. The causality between energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 3838–3842.
  32. Zhang, W.; Yang, S. The influence of energy consumption of China on its real GDP from aggregated and disaggregated viewpoints. Energy Policy 2013, 57, 76–81.
  33. Radwan, S. Employment and Unemployment in Egypt: Conventional Problems, Unconventional Remedies; The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies: Cairo, Egypt, 2002.
  34. Shahbaz, M.; Lean, H.H. The dynamics of electricity consumption and economic growth: A revisit study of their causality in Pakistan. Energy 2012, 39, 146–153.
  35. Heidari, H.; Katircioglu, S.T.; Saeidpour, L. Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Are we ready to natural gas price liberalization in Iran?. Energy Policy 2013, 63, 638–645.
  36. Zhi-Guo, L.; Cheng, H.; Dong-Ming, W. Empirical research on the relationship between natural gas consumption and economic growth in Northeast Asia. Energy Environ. 2018, 29, 216–231.
  37. Gujarati, D.N.; Porter, D.C. Basic Econometrics, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  38. Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y.; Smith, R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 2001, 16, 289–326.
  39. Odhiambo, N.M. Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 617–622.
  40. Narayan, P.K. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl. Econ. 2005, 37, 1979–1990.
  41. Pahlavani, M.; Wilson, E.; Worthington, A.C. Trade-GDP nexus in Iran: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. Applied Econometrics 2005.
  42. Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis; Pearson Education India: New Delhi, India, 2003.
  43. Shan, J.; Jianhong, Q. Does financial development lead economic growth? The case of China. Ann. Econ. Finance 2006, 7, 197.
  44. Yuan, J.; Zhao, C.; Yu, S.; Hu, Z. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Econ. 2007, 29, 1179–1191.
  45. Wolde-Rufael, Y. Energy consumption and economic growth: the experience of African countries revisited. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 217–224.
  46. Morley, B. Causality between economic growth and immigration: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Econ. Lett. 2006, 90, 72–76.
  47. Aslan, A. Causality between electricity consumption and economic growth in Turkey: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Sources B Econ. Plan. Policy 2014, 9, 25–31.