New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

Underground Natural Gas Storage: Enhancing Flexibility in Brazil’s Electricity Sector

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v4i2.1307
Almeida, J. R. U. C., Losekann, L., de Almeida, E., & Raeder, F. (2025). Underground Natural Gas Storage: Enhancing Flexibility in Brazil’s Electricity Sector. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 4(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v4i2.1307
Volume 4 Issue 2: December 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 José Ricardo Uchôa Cavalcanti Almeida, Luciano Losekann, Edmar de Almeida, Francisco Raeder
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • José Ricardo Uchôa Cavalcanti Almeida

    Electrical Department, Engineering School, Fluminense Federal University, 24210‑240, Niterói, RJ Brazil
    CIENAM, Interdisciplinary Center for Energy and Environment, Federal University of Bahia, 40170‑115, Salvador, BA, Brazil
  • Luciano Losekann

    Economics Department, Fluminense Federal University, 24210‑201, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
  • Edmar de Almeida

    Institute of Energy, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC‑Rio), 22453‑900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Francisco Raeder

    Economics Department, Fluminense Federal University, 24210‑201, Niterói, RJ, Brazil

Received: 11 June 2025; Revised: 23 June 2025; Accepted: 13 August 2025; Published: 29 August 2025

Supply flexibility is an essential attribute for the development of natural gas markets. In countries that have a mature market, gas storage capacity is used to deal with variations in demand. In Brazil, the natural gas market is still developing, and flexibility is an important challenge. In most of the more mature natural gas markets, the seasonality of demand is closely linked to temperature (harsh winter), and flexibility mechanisms were developed for this purpose. In Brazil, demand volatility is determined by the thermoelectric segment, as gas thermal plants have a complementary role to the hydroelectric park. This situation has brought challenges to the development of the gas market in Brazil. Thus, flexibility mechanisms can generate significant efficiency gains by avoiding underutilization of infrastructure. The article analyzes the Underground Storage of Natural Gas (UGS) as a “flexibility” tool, suitable for the Brazilian market to guarantee a balance of supply versus demand without deficits and in an optimized way, considering the randomness of gas demand. The economic value added by UGS to the electricity sector is illustrated through a case study of a natural gas thermoelectric plant that uses pre‑salt associated gas. Thus, using the Monte Carlo simulation method, this study demonstrated the economic value for the Brazilian electricity sector of contracting underground natural gas storage capacity to be used in the dispatch of natural gas‑fired thermal power plants as part of a trade‑off with liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Keywords:

Underground Natural Gas storage Economic Value Market Design Power Sector

References

  1. Baranes, E.; Mirabel, F.; Poudou, J.C. Access to Natural Gas Storage Facilities: Strategic and Regulation Issues. Energy Econ. 2014, 41, 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.007
  2. Chaton, C.; Creti, A.; Villeneuve, B. Some Economics of Seasonal Gas Storage. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4235–4246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.034
  3. Zhou, J.; Zhou, L.; Liang, G.; et al. Optimal Design of the Gas Storage Surface Pipeline System with Injection and Withdrawal Conditions. Petroleum 2020, 7, 102–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2020.05.003
  4. De Jong, C. Gas Storage Valuation and Optimization. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 24, 365–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.029
  5. Hirschhausen, C. Infrastructure Investments and Resource Adequacy in the Restructured US Natural Gas Market – Is Supply Security at Risk? MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006, pp. 1–30.
  6. Ejarque, J.M. Evaluating the Economic Cost of Natural Gas Strategic Storage Restrictions. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 44–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.008
  7. Maricic, V.K.; Danilovic, D. Preliminary Management and Optimization of a Gas Reservoir in Central Serbia. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2010, 70, 107–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.10.004
  8. Devine, M.T.; Russo, M. Liquefied Natural Gas and Gas Storage Valuation: Lessons from the Integrated Irish and UK Markets. Appl. Energy 2019, 238, 1389–1406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.157
  9. Qiao, Z.; Guo, Q.; Sun, H.; et al. Multi-Time Period Optimized Configuration and Scheduling of Gas Storage in Gas-Fired Power Plants. Appl. Energy 2018, 226, 924–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.033
  10. Almeida, J.R.U.C.; de Almeida, E.L.F.; Torres, E.A.; et al. Economic Value of Underground Natural Gas Storage for the Brazilian Power Sector. Energy Policy 2018, 121, 488–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.005
  11. Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; et al. Demand for Storage and Import of Natural Gas in China until 2060: Simulation with a Dynamic Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158674
  12. Zhang, J.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, T.; et al. Natural Gas Market and Underground Gas Storage Development in China. J. Energy Storage 2020, 29, 101338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101338
  13. Devlin, J.; Li, K.; Higgins, P.; et al. The Importance of Gas Infrastructure in Power Systems with High Wind Power Penetrations. Appl. Energy 2016, 167, 294–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.150
  14. Cavaliere, A.; Giust, V.; Maggi, M. Efficient Mechanisms for Access to Storage When Competition in Gas Markets Is Imperfect. Energy Econ. 2013, 36, 481–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.005
  15. Escobar, E.N.; Mora, G.R.A.; Kemp, A.G. Underground Natural Gas Storage in the UK: Business Feasibility. Case Study. In Proceedings of the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 23–26 May 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/143019-ms
  16. Malyscheff, A.M.; Trafalis, T.B. Natural Gas Storage Valuation via Least Squares Monte Carlo and Support Vector Regression. Energy Syst. 2017, 8, 815–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-017-0239-7
  17. Bäuerle, N.; Riess, V. Gas Storage Valuation with Regime Switching. Energy Syst. 2016, 7, 499–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0178-0
  18. Anyadiegwu, C.I.C.; Anyanwu, E.E.; Obah, B. Economic Viability of Underground Gas Storage in Depleted Oil Reservoirs in Nigeria. Pet. Coal 2012, 54, 1–10.
  19. Atoyebi, T.M. The Preferred Natural Gas Conservation Option: Underground Storage of Natural Gas. In Proceedings of the Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Calabar, Nigeria, 31 July–7 August 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/136984-ms
  20. Budny, C.; Madlener, R.; Hilgers, C. Economic Feasibility of Pipe Storage and Underground Reservoir Storage Options for Power-to-Gas Load Balancing. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 102, 258–266.
  21. Bjerksund, P.; Stensland, G.; Vagstad, F. Gas Storage Valuation: Price Modelling v. Optimization Methods. Energy J. 2011, 32, 203–227.