A Comparative Analysis of Selected Improved Biomass Cookstoves’ Temperature Profiles Using the Testo 310 Flue Gas Analyzer-Scilight

New Energy Exploitation and Application

Article

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Improved Biomass Cookstoves’ Temperature Profiles Using the Testo 310 Flue Gas Analyzer

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v4i2.1233
Lahai, U. M., Ofosu, E. A., & Gyamfi, S. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Selected Improved Biomass Cookstoves’ Temperature Profiles Using the Testo 310 Flue Gas Analyzer. New Energy Exploitation and Application, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54963/neea.v4i2.1233
Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025): In Progress
Copyright (c) 2025 Umar Museheeh Lahai, Eric Antwi Ofosu, Samuel Gyamfi
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by New Energy Exploitation and Application (NEEA) agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse and transform the content.

Authors

  • Umar Museheeh Lahai

    Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, School of Energy, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, P. O Box 214, Ghana
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Milton Margai Technical University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
  • Eric Antwi Ofosu

    Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, School of Energy, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, P. O Box 214, Ghana
  • Samuel Gyamfi

    Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, School of Energy, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, P. O Box 214, Ghana

Received: 16 May 2025; Revised: 23 June 2025; Accepted: 7 July 2025; Published: 21 July 2025

One of the major challenges facing the energy sectors in practically all developing countries worldwide is clean cooking. In Sierra Leone, only 1% of the population has access to clean cooking, making it one of the worst among the developing countries with clean cooking problems. Many people are switching to improved biomass cookstoves (IBCs), but the unprecedented production of charcoal‑based IBCs and varied designs, particularly ceramic linings, make it difficult for users to choose the right size. The study surveyed major IBC production and sales centres in Sierra Leone’s western regions between 2021 and 2023, examining temperature profiles of the metal stove (MS) and wonder stove (WS). The data showed that an average of 3352 MS and 1833 WS were produced and sold between 2021 to 2023. A water boiling test was adopted for IBCs testing and Testo 310 flue gas analyzer was used to track the temperature profiles of the chosen IBCs. The findings suggest that WS could be able to generate and retain heat more quickly and sustainably than MS. Additionally, the recorded temperatures and timings of all IBCs were also subjected to a systematic correlational analysis. A simulation of the various temperatures and times was also plotted to ascertain the temperature‑time graph differences. These results are relevant and could aid in the analysis of IBC emissions and thermal efficiency. Thus, the results of the study could be utilized to offer policy recommendations for IBC production and sales centres in Sierra Leone and other developing countries.

Keywords:

Charcoal Charcoal Energy Density Clean Cooking Correlational Analysis Energy Thermal Efficiency

References

  1. Global Impact of War in Ukraine: Energy Crisis. Available online: https://unctad.org/publication/global-impact-war-ukraine-energy-crisis (accessed on 19 January 2025).
  2. World Energy Outlook 2024. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024 (accessed on 28 December 2024).
  3. Berahab, R. The Energy Crisis of 2021 and its Implications for Africa. Available online: https://www.policycenter.ma/publications/energy-crisis-2021-and-its-implications-africa (accessed on 10 December 2024).
  4. Stritzke, S.; Sakyi-Nyarko, C.; Bisaga, I.; et al. Results-Based Financing (RBF) for Modern Energy Cooking Solutions: An Effective Driver for Innovation and Scale? Energies 2021, 14, 4559.
  5. Wright, C.; Sathre, R.; Buluswar, S. The global challenge of clean cooking systems. Food Security 2020, 12, 1219–1240.
  6. Meng, T.; Florkowski, W.J.; Sarpong, D.B.; et al. Cooking Fuel Usage in Sub-Saharan Urban Households. Energies 2021, 14, 4629.
  7. Lahai, U.M.; Antwi, E.O.; Gyamfi, S.; et al. Assessment of Post-Combustion CO2, CO and PM2.5 Levels from Selected Improved Biomass Cookstoves in Sierra Leone. SSRG Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2024, 11, 48–69.
  8. Lahai, U.M.; Ofosu, E.A.; Gyamfi, S.; et al. The Assessment of Combustion Performance of Improved Cookstoves in Sierra Leone. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 2023, 71, 196–211.
  9. Alvarez-Ramirez, J.; Vernon-Carter, E.J.; Carrillo-Navas, H.; et al. Effects of cooking temperature and time on the color, morphology, crystallinity, thermal properties, starch-lipid complexes formation and rheological properties of roux. LWT 2018, 91, 203–212.
  10. Gebreegziabher, Z.; Beyene, A.D.; Bluffstone, R.; et al. Fuel savings, cooking time and user satisfaction with improved biomass cookstoves: Evidence from controlled cooking tests in Ethiopia. Res. Energy Econ. 2018, 52, 173–185.
  11. Ayub, H.R.; Ambusso, W.J.; Manene, F.M. A Review of Cooking Systems and Energy Efficiencies. American J. Energy Eng. 2021, 9, 1–7.
  12. Njenga, M.; Gitau, J.K.; Njenga, M.; et al. Innovative biomass cooking approaches for sub-Saharan Africa. African J. Food, Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2019, 19, 14066–14087.
  13. Kaputo, K.; Mwanza, M.; Talai, S. A Review of Improved Cooker Stove Utilization Levels, Challenges and Benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Energy Res. Rev. 2023, 14, 9–25.
  14. L'Orange, C.; DeFoort, M.; Willson, B. Influence of testing parameters on biomass stove performance and development of an improved testing protocol. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2012,16, 3–12.
  15. Demirbas, A.; Ahmad, W.; Alamoudi, R.; et al. Sustainable charcoal production from biomass. Energy Sources, Part A 2016, 38, 1882–1889.
  16. Hwangdee, P.; Jansiri, C.; Sudajan, S.; et al. Physical Characteristics and Energy Content of Biomass Charcoal Powder. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2021, 11, 158–169.
  17. Wolters, F.C.; Pagni, P.J.; Frost, T.R.; et al. Size Constraints on Self Ignition of Charcoal Briquets. Fire Saf. Sci. 2003, 7, 593–604.
  18. Ajayeoba, A.O.; Fajobi, M.O.; Adebiyi, K.A.; et al. Safety assessment of charcoal usage and effects of common charcoal ignition aiders on combustion indices. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16940.
  19. Barpatra Gohain, R.J.; Dutta, P.P. A Numerical and Experimental Performance Assessments of an Improved Natural Draft Biomass Cook Stove. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2024, 1–28.
  20. Zhou, H.; Wang, G.; Tu, H.; et al. Combustion Temperature in a Three-Dimenstional Porous Stove with a High-Fedelity Structure. Therm. Eng. 2023, 233, 121108.
  21. Mengsi, D.; Pengxin, Z.; Hanyu, Y.; et al. Directions to improve the thermal efficiency of household biomass cookstoves: A review. Energy Build. 2023, 278, 112625.
  22. Muske, K.R.; Howse, J.W.; Hansen, G.A.; et al. Temperature Profile Estimation for a Thermal Regenerator. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 7–10 December 1999.
  23. Policy recommendations for clean cooking access in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Available online: https://iclei.org/e-library/policy-recommendations-for-clean-cooking-access-in-freetown-sierra-leone/ (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  24. Ballard-Tremeer, G.; Jawurek, H.H. The “hood method” of Measuring Emissions of Rural Cooking Devices. Biomass Energy 1999, 16, 341–345.
  25. Bhattacharya, S.C.; Albina, D.O.; Salam, P.A. Emission factors of wood and charcoal-fired cookstoves. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23, 453–469.
  26. Sutar, K.B.; Kohli, S.; Ravi, M.R.; et al. Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1128–1166.
  27. Lahai, U.M.; Antwi, E.O.; Gyamfi, S.; et al. Technical Considerations for the Design and Selection of Improved Cookstoves: A Review. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 2022, 70, 439–449.
  28. Kehirsagar, M.P.; Kalamkar, V.R. A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 580–603.
  29. Still, D.; Bentson, S.; Li, H. Results of Laboratory Testing of 15 Cookstove Designs in Accordance with the ISO/IWA Tiers of Performance. EcoHealth 2015, 12, 12–24.
  30. NumPy Ninja. Available online: https://www.numpyninjaacademy.com (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  31. Memon, S.A.; Jaiswal, M.S.; Jain, Y.; et al. A comprehensive review and a systematic approach to enhance the performance of improved cookstove (ICS). J. Thermal Anal. Calorim. 2020, 141, 2253–2263.