Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

Environmental Policy Stringency, Air Quality, and Human Health in the Context of Sustainable Development: Evidence from Europe and Africa

Abdirahman Ahmed ORCID ,  Rima Isaifan ORCID
    Received: 1 November 2025; Revised: 7 January 2026; Accepted: 22 January 2026; Published: 18 February 2026

    Abstract

    Air pollution remains a major global environmental and public health challenge, with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) contributing substantially to premature mortality. Environmental policy stringency is increasingly used to reduce emissions and population exposure, yet its effectiveness varies across institutional and economic contexts. This study examines the relationship between environmental policy stringency and PM2.5 exposure, and its implications for human health, through a comparative analysis of Germany and France in Europe and South Africa and Kenya in Africa. Results reveal marked regional disparities. Germany and France exhibit high policy stringency scores of approximately 5.5 and 5.1, respectively, alongside PM2.5 exposure levels of around 10 µg/m3 in 2020. In contrast, South Africa and Kenya experience exposure levels near 24 µg/m3, more than twice those observed in the European countries. Germany also reduced PM2.5 exposure by more than 15% between 2010 and 2020, coinciding with stronger environmental regulation, renewable energy investment, and effective enforcement. Overall, stringent environmental policies are associated with improved air quality and reduced population exposure, but their effectiveness depends on governance quality, institutional capacity, energy-system characteristics, and regulatory enforcement. The findings emphasize context-sensitive environmental governance, stronger institutional capacity, effective regulatory implementation, and clean-energy transitions to improve air quality and public health.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. World Bank. The Global Health Cost of PM 2.5 Air Pollution: A Case for Action beyond 2021; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
    2. 2. Isaifan, R.J.; Al-Thani, H.G. Action Taken to Reduce Air Pollution and Its One Health Impacts in MENA Countries. In Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation: Development, Economics, and Technologies; Ogwu, M.C., Izah, S.C., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 439–473.
    3. 3. Kao, H.-M.; Lo, Y.-C.; Li, C.-Y.; et al. Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Risk of Scooter Collisions among Older Adults. Inj. Epidemiol. 2025, 12, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00620-x
    4. 4. Qi, Y.; Wei, S.; Xin, T.; et al. Passage of Exogeneous Fine Particles from the Lung into the Brain in Humans and Animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2022, 119, e2117083119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117083119
    5. 5. World Health Organization. Air Pollution. In Compendium of WHO and Other UN Guidance on Health and Environment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
    6. 6. Ackerman, F.; Stanton, E.A. Climate Change and Global Equity; Anthem Press: London, UK, 2014.
    7. 7. Arceo-Gomez, E.O.; López-Feldman, A. Extreme Temperatures and School Performance of the Poor: Evidence from Mexico. Econ. Lett. 2024, 238, 111700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111700
    8. 8. Andrews, R.N.L. Environmental Regulation and Business “Self-Regulation.” Policy Sci. 1998, 31, 177–197.
    9. 9. International Monetary Fund. African Dept. South Africa Carbon Pricing and Climate Mitigation Policy. IMF Staff Ctry. Rep. 2023, 2023, A003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400245350.002.A003
    10. 10. OECD. A Tool to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Environmental Policy. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/economic-policies-to-foster-green-growth/how-stringent-are-environmental-policies.html (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    11. 11. Fatima, N.; Xuhua, H.; Alnafisah, H.; et al. Enhancing Climate Action in OECD Countries: The Role of Environmental Policy Stringency for Energy Transitioning to a Sustainable Environment. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2024, 36, 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00978-7
    12. 12. Hassabou, A.; Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. Techno-Economic Analysis and Assessment of an Innovative Solar Hybrid Photovoltaic Thermal Collector for Transient Net Zero Emissions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188304
    13. 13. Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. The Energy-Economy Nexus of Advanced Air Pollution Control Technologies: Pathways to Sustainable Development. Energies 2025, 18, 2378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092378
    14. 14. Melhim, S.H.; Isaifan, R.J. Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Transport Emissions: An Investigation of Elasticity-Based Decoupling Metrics in the Gulf. Economies 2025, 13, 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13110323
    15. 15. OECD. Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: A Composite Index Approach; OECD: Paris, France, 2014.
    16. 16. OECD. Environmental Statistics, Accounts and Indicators. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/environmental-statistics-accounts-and-indicators.html (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    17. 17. World Bank Group. South Africa. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/country/southafrica (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    18. 18. Yuan, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q.; et al. Evolution Analysis of Environmental Standards: Effectiveness on Air Pollutant Emissions Reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 511–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.127
    19. 19. Maqsoom, A.; Irfan, M.; Ul Basharat, M.; et al. Carbon Markets and Carbon Pricing Mechanisms: How Developing Economies Can Benefit? Procedia Comput. Sci. 2025, 256, 1416–1426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.274
    20. 20. Bovenberg, L.; Goulder, L.H. Environmental Taxation and Regulation. In Handbook of Public Economics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; 3, pp. 1471–1545.
    21. 21. Frohm, E.; D’Arcangelo, F.M.; Kruse, T.; et al. Environmental Policy Stringency and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Cross-Country Sector-Level Data; OECD: Paris, France, 2023.
    22. 22. Ellerman, A.D.; Marcantonini, C.; Zaklan, A. The European Union Emissions Trading System: Ten Years and Counting. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2016, 10, 89–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev014
    23. 23. Kruse, T.; Dechezlepretre, A.; Saffar, R.; et al. Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: An Update of the OECD Composite EPS Indicator; OECD: Paris, France, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/90ab82e8-en
    24. 24. Ferrini Rodrigues, P.; Facundes da Costa, R. Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution through Sustainable Energy Practices in Households, the Urban Economy, and Mobility. In Sustainable Urban Environments for Human Health; Academic Press: London, UK, 2026; pp. 123–164.
    25. 25. OECD. The Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution; OECD: Paris, France, 2016.
    26. 26. Guerova, G.; Jones, J.; Douša, J.; et al. Review of the State of the Art and Future Prospects of the Ground-Based GNSS Meteorology in Europe. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2016, 9, 5385–5406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5385-2016
    27. 27. Brauer, M.; Freedman, G.; Frostad, J.; et al. Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03709
    28. 28. World Bank. PM2.5 Air Pollution, Mean Annual Exposure (Micrograms per Cubic Meter). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.PM25.MC.M3 (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    29. 29. Hillebrand, B.; Buttermann, H.G.; Behringer, J.M.; et al. The Expansion of Renewable Energies and Employment Effects in Germany. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 3484–3494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.017
    30. 30. Rexeis, M.; Hausberger, S. Trend of Vehicle Emission Levels until 2020 – Prognosis Based on Current Vehicle Measurements and Future Emission Legislation. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 4689–4698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.034
    31. 31. Hentrich, S.; Matschoss, P.; Michaelis, P. Emissions Trading and Competitiveness: Lessons from Germany. Clim. Policy 2009, 9, 316–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0453
    32. 32. World Bank. World Bank Open Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    33. 33. International Energy Agency. South Africa. Available online: https://www.iea.org/countries/south-africa (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    34. 34. OECD. OECD Data Explorer. Available online: https://data-explorer.oecd.org/ (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    35. 35. International Energy Agency. Kenya. Available online: https://www.iea.org/countries/kenya (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    36. 36. European Environment Agency. Europe’s Air Quality Status 2024. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/europes-air-quality-status-2024 (accessed on 7 September 2025).
    37. 37. Al-Thani, H.G.; Isaifan, R.J. Policies and Regulations for Sustainable Clean Air: An Overview. In Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation: Development, Economics, and Technologies; Ogwu, M.C., Izah, S.C., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 409–437.
    38. 38. Oguge, O.; Nyamondo, J.; Adera, N.; et al. Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Health Implications for Nairobi, Kenya. Environ. Epidemiol. 2024, 8, e307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000307
    ×