Human iPSC Models at the Nexus of Environmental Exposures and Human Health: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions

Karthik Rajendran ORCID ,  Sankaramanivel Sundararaj ORCID ,  Amit Khanna ORCID
    Received: 14 September 2025; Revised: 2 November 2025; Accepted: 9 December 2025; Published: 12 January 2026

    Abstract

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have emerged as transformative platforms for investigating environmental toxicant effects on human health. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent advancements (2022–2025) in iPSC-based environmental toxicology, with particular emphasis on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), multi-omics technologies, and the emerging "digital twin" concept for personalized risk assessment. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using standardized keywords and predefined inclusion criteria to ensure methodological transparency and reproducibility. The review examines iPSC-derived cellular models encompassing hepatic, neural, cardiac, pulmonary, and renal systems, evaluating their applications in elucidating mechanisms of toxicity for diverse environmental hazards including heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), microplastics, and emerging contaminants. Critical comparisons with traditional animal models, primary human cells, and immortalized cell lines highlight iPSC advantages in predictive capability, cost-efficiency, and ethical considerations, alongside persistent limitations in scalability, immune-component representation, and vascularization. The manuscript proposes that coupling iPSC platforms with AI-driven predictive modeling and comprehensive multi-omics profiling offers a transformative pathway toward digital-twin systems capable of simulating individualized and population-level responses to environmental exposures. Current regulatory landscape and standardization efforts are reviewed. Remaining knowledge gaps and future research priorities required for achieving widespread regulatory acceptance and implementation in environmental health risk assessment frameworks are comprehensively discussed.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
    2. 2. Krewski, D.; Acosta, D.; Andersen, M.; et al. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2010, 13, 51–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
    3. 3. Russell, W.M.S.; Burch, R.L. The principles of humane experimental technique. Med. J. Aust. 1960, 1, 500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb73127.x
    4. 4. Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Kreutz, A.; et al. Pluripotent stem cells for target organ developmental toxicity testing. Toxicol. Sci. 2024, 199, 163–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae037
    5. 5. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
    6. 6. Collins, F.S.; Tabak, L.A. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 2014, 505, 612–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/505612a
    7. 7. Barutcu, A.R.; Black, M.B.; Andersen, M.E. Transcriptomic re-analyses of human hepatocyte spheroids treated with PFAS reveals chain length and dose-dependent modes of action. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2024, 489, 117013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2024.117013
    8. 8. Ford, L.C.; Lin, H.-C.; Tsai, H.-H.D.; et al. Hazard and risk characterization of 56 structurally diverse PFAS using a targeted battery of broad coverage assays using six human cell types. Toxicology 2024, 503, 153763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2024.153763
    9. 9. Tsai, H.H.D.; Ford, L.C.; Chen, Z.; et al. Risk-based prioritization of PFAS using phenotypic and transcriptomic data from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes. ALTEX 2024, 41, 363–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2311031
    10. 10. Ku, J.; Asuri, P. Stem cell-based approaches for developmental neurotoxicity testing. Front. Toxicol. 2024, 6, 1402630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1402630
    11. 11. Sirenko, O.; Parham, F.; Dea, S.; et al. Functional and mechanistic neurotoxicity profiling using human iPSC-derived neural 3D cultures. Toxicol. Sci. 2019, 167, 58–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy218
    12. 12. Majumder, J.; Murphy, W.L. Neural organoids as advanced tools for neurotoxicity modeling. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2025, 9, 100249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100249
    13. 13. Gintant, G.; Burridge, P.; Gepstein, L.; et al. Use of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in preclinical cancer drug cardiotoxicity testing: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Res. 2019, 125, e75–e92.
    14. 14. Hu, D.; Cao, Y.; Cai, C.; et al. Establishment of human cerebral organoid systems to model early neural development and assess the central neurotoxicity of environmental toxins. Neural Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 242–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-23-00928
    15. 15. Ma, J.; Wang, N.Y.; Jagani, R.; et al. Proarrhythmic toxicity of low dose bisphenol A and its analogs in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and human cardiac organoids through delay of cardiac repolarization. Chemosphere 2023, 328, 138562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138562
    16. 16. Yang, H.; Obrezanova, O.; Pointon, A.; et al. Prediction of inotropic effect based on calcium transients in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and machine learning. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2023, 459, 116342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2022.116342
    17. 17. Krittanawong, C.; Qadeer, Y.K.; Hayes, R.B.; et al. PM2.5 and cardiovascular diseases: state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Cardiol. Cardiovasc. Risk Prev. 2023, 19, 200217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200217
    18. 18. Masui, A.; Hirai, T.; Gotoh, S. Perspectives of future lung toxicology studies using human pluripotent stem cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 389–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03188-9
    19. 19. Hyun, S.A.; Lee, C.Y.; Ko, M.Y.; et al. Cardiac toxicity from bisphenol A exposure in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2021, 428, 115696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2021.115696
    20. 20. Chandy, M.; Obal, D.; Wu, J.C. Elucidating effects of environmental exposure using human-induced pluripotent stem cell disease modeling. EMBO Mol. Med. 2022, 14, EMMM202013260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202013260
    21. 21. Lee, J.; Baek, H.; Jang, J.; et al. Establishment of a human induced pluripotent stem cell derived alveolar organoid for toxicity assessment. Toxicol. In Vitro 2023, 89, 105585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105585
    22. 22. Zhou, B.; Wei, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. Microplastics exposure disrupts nephrogenesis and induces renal toxicity in human iPSC-derived kidney organoids. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 360, 124645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124645
    23. 23. Canzler, S.; Schor, J.; Busch, W.; et al. Prospects and challenges of multi-omics data integration in toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 371–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02656-y
    24. 24. Quintard, C.; Tubbs, E.; Jonsson, G.; et al. A microfluidic platform integrating functional vascularized organoids-on-chip. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45710-4
    25. 25. Klibaner-Schiff, E.; Simonin, E.M.; Akdis, C.A.; et al. Environmental exposures influence multigenerational epigenetic transmission. Clin. Epigenetics 2024, 16, 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01762-3
    26. 26. Katsoulakis, E.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; et al. Digital twins for health: A scoping review. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01073-0
    27. 27. Stoykova, K. Towards non-animal testing in European regulatory toxicology: An introduction to the REACH framework and challenges in implementing the 3Rs. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 2025, 16, 985–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.1
    28. 28. Prior, H.; Casey, W.; Kimber, I.; et al. Reflections on the progress towards non-animal methods for acute toxicity testing of chemicals. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 102, 30–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.12.008
    29. 29. Hartung, T.; Bremer, S.; Casati, S.; et al. A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2004, 32, 467–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290403200503
    30. 30. Daley, M.C.; Mende, U.; Choi, B.R.; et al. Beyond pharmaceuticals: fit-for-purpose new approach methodologies for environmental cardiotoxicity testing. ALTEX 2023, 40, 103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2109131
    31. 31. Caloni, F.; De Angelis, I.; Hartung, T. Replacement of animal testing by integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA): a call for in virtuo toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 1935–1950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03299-x
    32. 32. Zhang, S.; Wan, Z.; Kamm, R.D. Vascularized organoids on a chip: strategies for engineering organoids with functional vasculature. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 473–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d0lc01186j
    33. 33. Scholze, M.; Taxvig, C.; Kortenkamp, A.; et al. Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) for predicting reduced anogenital distance produced by anti-androgenic pesticides in a rodent model for male reproductive disorders. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 117005.
    34. 34. Ankley, G.T.; Edwards, S.W. The adverse outcome pathway: a multifaceted framework supporting 21st century toxicology. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 9, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2018.03.004
    35. 35. Gao, X.; Li, R.; Campasino, K.; et al. Hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells: Towards establishing an in vitro model for assessing population variability in hepatotoxicity testing. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2025, 8, 100238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100238
    ×