The Role of Social Work in the Construction of Smart Cities: Practices and Prospects of Digital Services-Scilight

Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Article

The Role of Social Work in the Construction of Smart Cities: Practices and Prospects of Digital Services

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i2.1301
Chen, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-C. (2025). The Role of Social Work in the Construction of Smart Cities: Practices and Prospects of Digital Services. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 4(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i2.1301
Volume 4 Issue 2: September (In Progress)
Copyright (c) 2025 Yih-Chang Chen, Chia-Ching Lin
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Digital Technologies Research and Applications (DTRA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by DTRA agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source are properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, and transform the content.

Authors

  • Yih-Chang Chen

    Department of Information Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 711, Taiwan
    Bachelor Degree Program of Medical Sociology and Health Care, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 711, Taiwan
  • Chia-Ching Lin

    Department of Finance, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 711, Taiwan

Received: 10 June 2025; Revised: 11 July 2025; Accepted: 15 July 2025; Published: 28 July 2025

The swift advancement of global digital transformation has established smart cities as a prominent trend in modern urban planning. This research examines the essential role of social work in the development of smart cities, with a particular focus on the practical application of digital service platforms, exemplified by Taiwan’s “Smart Decision‑Making Action Platform for Social Workers.” Employing a mixed‑methods approach involving 762 social workers, this study addresses four fundamental questions: (1) in what ways can social work redefine its roles within the context of smart cities, (2) what are the specific impacts of digital technology integration on social work practices, (3) what successes and challenges are associated with current digital platforms, and (4) what strategies can be employed to develop integrated social work service systems for smart cities? The findings indicate that social workers play a vital bridging role within smart city ecosystems, resulting in a 35.7% increase in service efficiency and a 47.8% enhancement in practice safety. The integration of digital technology significantly improves working conditions, reduces risks, and enhances service quality while preserving a human‑centered approach. This study introduces the Smart City Social Work Integration Model (SCSWIM) and offers evidence‑based recommendations for policy formulation and the enhancement of professional practice in digitally‑enabled urban settings.

Keywords:

Smart City Social Work Digitalization Service Innovation Governance

References

  1. Almihat, M.G.M.; Kahn, M.T.E.; Aboalez, K.; et al. Energy and Sustainable Development in Smart Cities: An Overview. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 1389–1408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5040071
  2. Radu, L.-D. Disruptive Technologies in Smart Cities: A Survey on Current Trends and Challenges. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 1022–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3030051
  3. Esfandi, S.; Tayebi, S.; Byrne, J.; et al. Smart Cities and Urban Energy Planning: An Advanced Review of Promises and Challenges. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 414–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7010016
  4. Herath, H.M.K.K.M.B.; Mittal, M. Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Inf. Manage. Data Insights 2022, 2(1), 100076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100076
  5. Yan, Z.; Jiang, L.; Huang, X.; et al. Intelligent Urbanism with Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Tomorrow’s Smart Cities: Current Developments, Trends, and Future Directions. J. Cloud Comput. 2023, 12(1), 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-023-00569-6
  6. Bibri, S.E. The IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Sustainable Cities: Enabling Technologies and Practical Applications. In Advances in the Leading Paradigms of Urbanism and Their Amalgamation; Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Bibri, S.E. Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 191–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41746-8_8
  7. Chandani, A.; Prakash, O.; Prakash, P.; et al. Smart City: Artificial Intelligence in the City of the Future. In Geo-intelligence for Sustainable Development; Singh, T.P., Singh, D., Singh, R.B., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, Singapore, 2021; pp. 53–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4768-0_4
  8. Sibilla, M.; Gorgoni, A. Smart Welfare and Slow Digital Poverty: The New Face of Social Work. Eur. J. Soc. Work 2022, 26(3), 519–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2040440
  9. Kolotouchkina, O.; Ripoll González, L.; Belabas, W. Smart Cities, Digital Inequalities, and the Challenge of Inclusion. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 3355–3370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060130
  10. Rodionov, D.; Baranova, I.; Konnikov, E.; et al. Smart Cities: Development of a Model for Managing the State of the Social Environment. In Digital Transformation: What Are the Smart Cities Today?; Sari, M., Kulachinskaya, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49390-4_1
  11. Steiner, O. Social Work in the Digital Era: Theoretical, Ethical and Practical Considerations. Br. J. Soc. Work 2021, 51(8), 3358–3374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160
  12. Afrouz, R.; Lucas, J. A Systematic Review of Technology-Mediated Social Work Practice: Benefits, Uncertainties, and Future Directions. J. Soc. Work 2023, 23(5), 953–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231165926
  13. Rodríguez-Martínez, A.; Amezcua Aguilar, M.T.; Cortés Moreno, J.; et al. Ethical Issues Related to the Use of Technology in Social Work Practice. A Systematic Review. SAGE Open 2024, 14(3), 21582440241274842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241274842
  14. Okafor, C.C.; Aigbavboa, C.; Thwala, W.D. A Bibliometric Evaluation and Critical Review of the Smart City Concept – Making a Case for Social Equity. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2023, 14(3), 487–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-06-2020-0098
  15. Malek, J.A.; Lim, S.B.; Yigitcanlar, T. Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010376
  16. Sharma, N.K.; Hargreaves, T.; Pallett, H. Social Justice Implications of Smart Urban Technologies: An Intersectional Approach. Buildings Cities 2023, 4(1), 315–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.290
  17. Lee, J.; Babcock, J.; Pham, T.S.; et al. Smart City as a Social Transition towards Inclusive Development through Technology: A Tale of Four Smart Cities. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2022, 27(sup1), 75–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076
  18. Ntanda, A.; Carolissen, R. Technology’s Dual Role in Smart Cities and Social Equality: A Systematic Literature. J. Local Gov. Res. Innov. 2025, 6, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v6i0.238
  19. Kasinathan, P.; Pugazhendhi, R.; Elavarasan, R.M.; et al. Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215258
  20. Castells, M. The Information City, the New Economy, and the Network Society. In The Information Society Reader; Blom, R., Karvonen, E., Melin, H., et al. Eds.; Routledge: London, England, UK, 2004; pp. 150–164.
  21. Kaiser, Z.R.M.; Abdullah, M.; Deb, A. Sustainable Smart City and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Review. Reg. Sustain. 2025, 6, 100193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100193
  22. Cambra-Fierro, J.J.; López-Pérez, M.E.; Melero-Polo, I.; et al. Smart Innovations for Sustainable Cities: Insights from a Public-Private Innovation Ecosystem. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2024, 31(3), 1654–1666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2660
  23. Blasi, S.; Ganzaroli, A.; De Noni, I. Smartening Sustainable Development in Cities: Strengthening the Theoretical Linkage between Smart Cities and SDGs. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022, 80, 103793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103793
  24. Kruhlov, V.; Dvorak, J. Social Inclusivity in the Smart City Governance: Overcoming the Digital Divide. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135735
  25. Colding, J.; Nilsson, C.; Sjöberg, S. Smart Cities for All? Bridging Digital Divides for Socially Sustainable and Inclusive Cities. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 1044–1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7030044
  26. Li, W.; Zhang, L. Influencing Factors and Realization Paths for Smart Community Construction in China. PLoS ONE 2024, 19(5), e0303687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303687
  27. Lepore, D.; Testi, N.; Pasher, E. Building Inclusive Smart Cities through Innovation Intermediaries. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054024
  28. Matlala, L.S. Navigating the Nexus: The Integration of Social Media in Citizen-Based Monitoring for Public Service Delivery within the Smart City Landscape in South Africa. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Taipei, Taiwan, 11–14 June 2024; pp. 884–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657158
  29. Sanders, C.K.; Scanlon, E. The Digital Divide Is a Human Rights Issue: Advancing Social Inclusion Through Social Work Advocacy. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work 2021, 6(2), 130–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9
  30. Djatmiko, G.H.; Sinaga, O.; Pawirosumarto, S. Digital Transformation and Social Inclusion in Public Services: A Qualitative Analysis of E-Government Adoption for Marginalized Communities in Sustainable Governance. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
  31. Alfandari, R.; Whittaker, A.; Helm, D.; et al. The Future Is Here: Digital Technologies in Social Work Practice. Eur. Soc. Work Res. 2024, 2(1), 88–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768Y2024D000000006
  32. Batko, K. Digital Social Innovation Based on Big Data Analytics for Health and Well-Being of Society. J. Big Data 2023, 10(1), 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00846-w
  33. Germundsson, N.; Stranz, H.; Bergmark, Å. Reducing Administration? Examining the Alignment of Robotic Process Automation and Social Assistance in Swedish Personal Social Services. Nord. Soc. Work Res. 2024, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2024.2440720
  34. Murko, E.; Babšek, M.; Aristovnik, A. Artificial Intelligence and Public Governance Models in Socioeconomic Welfare: Some Insights from Slovenia. Adm. Manag. Public 2024, 43, 41–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2024.43-03
  35. Costa, G.A.; Cassini, S.T.A.; Keller, R. Applicability of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Tracking COVID-19: A Systematic Review. J. Geovis. Spat. Anal. 2024, 8, 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-024-00191-3
  36. Gustafsson, M.S.; Kazlou, A.; Wihlborg, E. Automation in Social Care: A Case Study of Organizational Challenges and Skills Dynamics in Three Swedish Municipalities. In Electronic Government. EGOV 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14841; Janssen, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 218–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_14
  37. Johnson, E.A.; Galatzan, B.J. A Critical Juncture: Reimagining Nursing Professional Identity and Regulation in the Ethical Integration of Innovation and Technology in Healthcare. J. Nurs. Regul. 2025, 16(1), 10–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnr.2025.03.005
  38. Hernández, J.E. Professional Practice in Health: Towards an Essential Integration of Vocation, Ethics and Social Skills. Med. Res. Arch. 2025, 13(6), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i6.6651
  39. Khuat, N.T. Integrating Innovation With Integrity: Navigating the Humanistic and Ethical Dimensions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Griot : Revista de Filosofia 2025, 25, 123–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v25i1.5281
  40. Gibbs, T.; Kharouf, H. The Value of Co-operation: An Examination of the Work Relationships of University Professional Services Staff and Consequences for Service Quality. Stud. High. Educ. 2020, 47(1), 38–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1725878
  41. Camilli Trujillo, C.; Cuervo Calvo, L.; García Gil, D.; et al. Mixed Methods Research in Service-Learning: An Integrative Systematic Review. Qual. Quant. 2022, 56(4), 2361–2386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01218-3
  42. Riazi, A.M.; Farsani, M.A. Mixed-Methods Research in Applied Linguistics: Charting the Progress through the Second Decade of the Twenty-First Century. Lang. Teach. 2024, 57(2), 143–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000332
  43. Hanu, C.; Dzandu, M.D.; Amegbe, H. Understanding Consumers’ Continuous Use of Fintech Solutions in Emerging Economies: A Blended Theory Approach. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 11053–11065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3401095
  44. Bouteraa, M. Mixed-Methods Approach to Investigating the Diffusion of FinTech Services: Enriching the Applicability of TOE and UTAUT Models. J. Islam. Mark. 2024, 15(8), 2036–2068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-12-2022-0343
  45. Ahmad, S.; Al Mutairi, A.; Nassr, S.G.; et al. A New Approach for Estimating Variance of a Population Employing Information Obtained from a Stratified Random Sampling. Heliyon 2023, 9(11), e21477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21477
  46. Triveni, G.R.V.; Danish, F.; Albalawi, O. Advancing Survey Sampling Efficiency under Stratified Random Sampling and Post-Stratification: Leveraging Symmetry for Enhanced Estimation Accuracy in the Prediction of Exam Scores. Symmetry 2024, 16, 604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050604
  47. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Toward Good Practice in Thematic Analysis: Avoiding Common Problems and Be(com)ing a Knowing Researcher. Int. J. Transgender Health 2022, 24(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
  48. Flaherty, H.B.; Henshaw, L.A.; Lee, S.R.; et al. Harnessing New Technology and Simulated Role Plays for Enhanced Engagement and Academic Success in Online Social Work Education. Stud. Clin. Soc. Work: Transform. Pract. Educ. Res. 2025, 1, 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/28376811.2025.2517025
  49. Scoresby, K.; Huslage, M.; Wallis, D. Exploring the Evidence-Based Practice Process with Social Work Practitioners. J. Evid.-Based Soc. Work 2024, 21(4), 492–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2316038
  50. López Peláez, A.; Erro-Garcés, A.; Gómez-Ciriano, E.J. Young People, Social Workers and Social Work Education: The Role of Digital Skills. Soc. Work Educ. 2020, 39(6), 825–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1795110
  51. Afrouz, R.; Crisp, B.R. Online Education in Social Work, Effectiveness, Benefits, and Challenges: A Scoping Review. Aust. Soc. Work 2020, 74(1), 55–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1808030
  52. Taylor-Beswick, A.M.L. Digitalizing Social Work Education: Preparing Students to Engage with Twenty-First Century Practice Need. Soc. Work Educ. 2022, 42(1), 44–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2049225
  53. Kronblad, C.; Jensen, S.H. ‘Being a Professional Is Not the Same as Acting Professionally’—How Digital Technologies Have Empowered the Creation and Enactment of a New Professional Identity in Law. J. Prof. Organ. 2023, 10(2), 99–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joad005
  54. Marshman, M.; Goos, M. Exploring the Identities of Hybrid Mathematics Teacher Educators. J. Math. Teacher Educ. 2025, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-025-09705-2
  55. Sedda, P.; Husson, O. Social Media Influencers: A New Hybrid Professionalism in the Age of Platform Capitalism? In Professionalism and Social Change; Maestripieri, L., Bellini, A., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 287–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31278-6_13
  56. Liu, S.; Huang, Q.; Lv, M. From Vocation to Profession: Multiple Identities of Chinese Management Academics. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11(1), 605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03102-5
  57. Bousfiha, M.; Berglund, H. Micro‐Transitions and Work Identity: The Case of Academic Entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2025, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1541
  58. Mohd Hussain, S.H.; Tasnim, R. Enhancing Undergraduates’ Digital Competencies through a Mentorship Model. Environ.-Behav. Proc. J. 2023, 8(SI15), 253–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI15.5096
  59. Pașcu, F. How to Develop Skills for the Future in the Social Work Field. Rev. Asist. Soc. 2023, XXII(4), 87–98.
  60. Nordesjö, K.; Scaramuzzino, G.; Ulmestig, R. The Social Worker-Client Relationship in the Digital Era: A Configurative Literature Review. Eur. J. Soc. Work 2021, 25(2), 303–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1964445
  61. Ricciardelli, L.A.; McGarity, S.; Nackerud, L. Social Work Education and the Recognition of Rights in the Digital Tech Age: Implications for Professional Identity. Soc. Work Educ. 2020, 41(1), 90–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1805427
  62. Schneider, D. Ensuring Privacy and Confidentiality in Social Work Through Intentional Omissions of Information in Client Information Systems: a Qualitative Study of Available and Non-available Data. DISO 2022, 1, 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00029-9
  63. Pascoe, K.M. Considerations for Integrating Technology into Social Work Practice: A Content Analysis of Nine Professional Social Work Associations’ Codes of Ethics. Int. Soc. Work 2021, 66(2), 298–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820980833
  64. Chen, T.; Gil-Garcia, R.; Gasco-Hernandez, M. Understanding Social Sustainability for Smart Cities: The Importance of Inclusion, Equity, and Citizen Participation as Both Inputs and Long-Term Outcomes. J. Smart Cities Soc. 2022, 1(2), 135–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210123