Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

Acoustic and Signal-Based Evaluation of AI-Assisted English Speech Training for Arabic-Speaking University Learners

Abdallah Abu Qub'a ORCID ,  Jassim Al Herz ORCID
    Received: 7 April 2026; Revised: 22 April 2026; Accepted: 7 May 2026; Published: 26 October 2026

    Abstract

    The biomechanical process that produces human speech creates measurable acoustic signals by vocal folds vibration and vocal tract resonant filtering. This study analyzed sound and vibration principles to estimate the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted pronunciation training in a university context. The study recorded speeches for 200 Arabic-speaking undergraduate students studying a general English course. Students were assigned randomly to an experimental group using ELSA Speak (a mobile AI application) that provides pronunciation feedback based on acoustic features and a control group receiving traditional teaching methods without using AI support. Researchers used a pre-test/post-test experimental design and used Praat and MATLAB to analyze speech recordings from reading and speaking tasks to extract objective acoustic measures, including fundamental frequency (F0) stability (jitter), formant frequency consistency (F1, F2 dispersion), and spectral characteristics (spectral centroid and bandwidth). The results of the paired t-tests and ANOVA showed that the experimental group achieved significant improvements (p < 0.05) compared to the control group. Specifically, pitch variability decreased noticeably (F0 standard deviation reduced by 39.5%), vowel articulation became more stable (formant dispersion reduced by 30–40%), and spectral organization improved. The findings also found that AI-assisted pronunciation training leads to measurable improvements in speech signal stability and clarity. This study highlights the value of sound analysis as a quantitative framework for evaluating human-centered speech learning systems.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1.Titze, I.R. Principles of Voice Production; National Center for Voice and Speech: Iowa City, IA, USA, 2000.
    2. 2.Flege, J.E. Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research; Strange, W., Ed.; York Press: Timonium, MD, USA, 1995; pp. 233–277.
    3. 3.Alharbi, B.; Aljutaily, M. On the Perceptual Accuracy of Non-Native Phonemic Contrasts: A Case Study of Native Arabic Speakers. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 2020, 16, 2003–2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851031
    4. 4.Abu Guba, M.N. Foot Duration and Polysyllabic Shortening among Arab Speakers of English. Loquens 2023, 9, e091.
    5. 5.Abu Guba, M.N.; Abu Qub'a, A. Acquisition of Stress Assignment Phonology by Levantine Arabic Learners of English: Evidence from nonsense words. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2026, 13, 102540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102540
    6. 6.Abu Guba, M.N.; Mashaqba, B.; Jarbou, S.; et al. Production of Vowel Reduction by Jordanian-Arabic Speakers of English: An Acoustic Study. Pozn. Stud. Contemp. Linguist. 2023, 59, 1–25.
    7. 7.Liakin, D.; Cardoso, W.; Liakina, N. Mobilising Instruction in a Second-Language Context: Learners' Perceptions of Two Speech Technologies. Languages 2017, 2, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages2030011
    8. 8.Dizon, G.; Tang, D. Intelligent Personal Assistants for Autonomous Second Language Learning: An Investigation of Alexa. JALT CALL J. 2020, 16, 107–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n2.273
    9. 9.McCrocklin, S. ASR-Based Dictation Practice for Second Language Pronunciation Improvement. J. Second Lang. Pronunciat. 2019, 5, 98–118.
    10. 10.Schmidt, R.W. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Appl. Linguist. 1990, 11, 129–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    11. 11.DeKeyser, R. Skill Acquisition Theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction; VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 97–113.
    12. 12.Christofidis, C.; Otero-Casado, A.; Torres-Ferrera, P.; et al. Performance Assessment of Interleaver Filters for Next-Generation Mobile Transport. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2026, 18, 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.575589
    13. 13.Otero-Casado, A.; Torres-Ferrera, P.; Christofidis, C.; et al. Impact of Subcarrier-Routing Devices on the Performance of DSCM Coherent Systems Evaluated with Analytical Models. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), Pisa, Italy, 6–9 May 2025; pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/ONDM65745.2025.11029344
    14. 14.Georgiou, G.P. Artificial Intelligence in Pronunciation Teaching: Use and Beliefs of Foreign Language Teachers. arXiv preprint 2025, arXiv:2503.04128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.04128
    15. 15.Kent, R.D.; Read, C. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech, 2nd ed.; Delmar Cengage Learning: Clifton Park, NY, USA, 2002.
    16. 16.Wang, Q.; Xu, F.; Wang, X.; et al. How Anxiety State Influences Speech Parameters: A Network Analysis Study from a Real Stressed Scenario. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030262
    17. 17.Abu Guba, M.N.; Daoud, S.; Jarbou, S. Foreign Accented-Speech and Perceptions of Confidence and Intelligence. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2018, 52, 1093–1113.
    18. 18.Abu Guba, M.N. Prosody Trumps Orthography in Second Language Phonology: The Case of Consonant Gemination. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2023, 52, 997–1015.
    19. 19.Adank, P.; Smits, R.; van Hout, R. A Comparison of Vowel Normalization Procedures for Language Variation Research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116, 3099–3107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335
    20. 20.Turner, G.S.; Tjaden, K.; Weismer, G. The Influence of Speaking Rate on Vowel Space and Speech Intelligibility for Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 1995, 38, 1001–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3805.1001
    21. 21.Abu Guba, M.N.; Fareh, S.; Yagi, S. Speech Rhythm in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Review. Int. J. Arabic-English Stud. 2023, 23, 183–202.
    22. 22.Neri, A.; Cucchiarini, C.; Strik, H. The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Speech Corrective Feedback for Improving Segmental Quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL 2008, 20, 225–243.
    23. 23.Amrate, M.; Tsai, P. Computer-assisted pronunciation training: A systematic review. ReCALL 2025, 37, 22–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344024000181
    24. 24.Okoye, K.; Nganji, J.T.; Escamilla, J.; et al. Machine learning model (RG-DMML) and ensemble algorithm for prediction of students’ retention and graduation in education. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2025, 6, 100205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100205
    25. 25.Bu, Y.; Ma, T.; Li, W.; et al. PTeacher: A Computer Aided Personalized Pronunciation Training System with Exaggerated Audio Visual Corrective Feedback. arXiv preprint 2021, arXiv:2105.05182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.05182
    26. 26.Swain, M. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition; Gass, S., Madden, C., Eds.; Newbury House: Rowley, MA, USA, 1985; pp. 235–253.
    27. 27.Watson, J.C.E. The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007.
    28. 28.Khalifa, F.E. An Intonational Study of Kuwaiti Bedouin Arabic. PhD Thesis, University of London, London, UK, 1984.
    29. 29.Avrianti, N.; Yuliana, Y.G.S.; Ikhsanudin, I. AI-Based Pronunciation Training Tools for English Language Learners: A Systematic Review. J. Engl. Educ. Program 2025, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v7i1.99864
    30. 30.El Kheir, Y.; Ali, A.; Chowdhury, S.A. Automatic Pronunciation Assessment: A Review. arXiv preprint 2023, arXiv:2310.13974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13974
    31. 31.Do, H.; Lee, W.; Lee, G.G. Acoustic Feature Mixup for Balanced Multi Aspect Pronunciation Assessment. arXiv preprint 2024, arXiv:2406.15723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.15723
    ×