Skip to main content Skip to journal navigation menu Skip to site footer
contact@ukscip.com
Article

Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Digital Platforms: Insights into Moodle and AI Apps for Lesson Planning and Delivery

Olwethu Solundwana ORCID ,  Nondwe Mtshatsha ORCID ,  Zanoxolo Gobingca ORCID
    Received: 20 January 2026; Revised: 10 February 2026; Accepted: 6 March 2026; Published: 29 October 2026

    Abstract

    Preservice teachers are increasingly integrating technologies such as Moodle and AI-driven (artificial intelligence) applications into their pedagogical preparation; however, their attitudes toward these tools remain underexplored. The study examined preservice teachers' perceptions of digital platforms: insights into Moodle and AI apps for lesson planning and delivery. The study adopts the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as its theoretical framework. A qualitative research approach was employed, utilising an interpretive phenomenological design to examine preservice teachers' lived experiences and attitudes in depth. The population comprised 243 preservice teachers enrolled in a Bachelor of Education program at a South African university. A purposive sample of 12 participants was selected, ensuring representation across year levels and subject specialisations based on their exposure to digital platforms. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data analysis followed Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis process, using NVivo software, which involved familiarisation, code generation, theme development, and review for rigour. The study findings revealed that preservice teachers described Moodle as highly useful for collaborative lesson planning, praising its resource-sharing features for fostering peer feedback and organisation in group projects. The study concluded that preservice teachers hold largely favourable attitudes toward digital platforms, affirming their role in competency development. However, there are still gaps in AI familiarity, highlighting the need for teacher training. These attitudes align with TAM predictions, understanding the need for intentional integration. The study recommends embedding Moodle and AI modules in preservice curricula and providing hands-on workshops to boost confidence and address barriers.

    Keywords

    References

    1. 1.Aslan, S.; Alanoğlu, M.; Karabatak, S. Enhancing 21st-Century Teaching Competencies: The Key Role of Digital Literacy in Connecting Pre-Service Teachers' TPACK. Inf. Dev. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251315841
    2. 2.Kaleci, D. Integration and Application of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Moodle Platform: A Theoretical Exploration. J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn. 2025, 8, 100–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1595079
    3. 3.Khalil, S.M. From resistance to acceptance and use of technology in academia. Open Prax. 2013, 5, 151–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.5
    4. 4.da Silva, A.F.A. Critical Thinking and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Master’s Thesis, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2024.
    5. 5.Mathura, N. School Management Teams' Perceptions and Experiences of Implementing Quality Management Systems in Public High Schools. Master’s Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2024.
    6. 6.Mugunzva, F.I. Impact of Digital Technologies on Entrepreneurship Education Within Institutions of Higher Education in the Industry 4.0 Era: A South African Case; University of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa, 2024.
    7. 7.Roy, P. Master the Art of Cooperative Learning: Unlock the Power of Student Collaboration, Maximize Classroom Potential, and Build Stronger Learning Communities; Notion Press: Chennai, India, 2024. Available online: https://notionpress.com/in/read/master-the-art-of-cooperative-learning
    8. 8.Darwish, D. Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Education Processes; Deep Science Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2025.
    9. 9.Geyer, B.-C. An Explanatory Study of Media Used in Blended Learning at Austrian University of Applied Sciences; University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria: Wels, Austria, 2022.
    10. 10.Netreba, M.; Puntí-Brun, M.; Espinosa-Mirabet, S.; et al. Professional-Academic Partnerships: Creating Authentic Learning Experiences for Future Organizational Spokespersons. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma, Spain, 30 June–2 July 2025; pp. 6401–6409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.1573
    11. 11.Bahar, N.; Mansor, Z.; Jambari, D.I.; et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Moodle-Based Learning Management System in Malaysian Public Universities Using a Refined SQTL Framework. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Kuching, Malaysia, 13–15 November 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI68459.2025.11330439
    12. 12.Arek-Bawa, O.; Reddy, S. Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Teaching in the Digital Age. Athens J. Educ. 2025, 12, 77–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.12-1-5
    13. 13.Latsabidze, N. Enhancing English Language Teaching with AI: Practical Case Studies, Challenges, and Pedagogical Insights. In AI-Powered English Teaching; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2026; pp. 179–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1952-0.ch006
    14. 14.Hossain, M.K.; Al Younus, M.A. Teachers' Perspectives on Integrating ChatGPT into EFL Writing Instruction. TESOL Commun. 2025, 4, 41–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20250103
    15. 15.Mohammed, M.K.; Abdulhamid, M. E-Learning as a Tool for Social and Collaborative Teaching and Learning in a Pandemic Era: An Overview. Inf. Technol. Librariansh. 2021, 1, 49–58.
    16. 16.Borthwick, K. Sharing Voices: Exploring Open Educational Practices with Language Educators and Students through Participatory Research. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2022.
    17. 17.Brown, O.; Davison, R.M.; Decker, S.; et al. Theory-Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management. Br. J. Manag. 2024, 35, 3–23.
    18. 18.Tsarikova, M. Enhancing User Experience Design through Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Bachelor’s Thesis, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland, 2025.
    19. 19.Wahid, T.T. Study of Ethical Guidelines for AI Tools in Higher Education in Nordic Region. Master’s Thesis, Lappeenranta–Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2024.
    20. 20.Lamanauskas, V. Pre-Service Preschool and Primary School Teachers' Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence: Readiness to Use and Potential Challenges. In Proceedings of the 6th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, Šiauliai, Lithuania, 16–19 June 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/balticste/2025.133
    21. 21.Topal, İ. Sora in the L2 Classroom: Harnessing Text-to-Video AI for Vocabulary Learning. In Proceedings of the Technology for Second Language Learning Conference (TSLL 2025), Iowa, IA, USA, 5–8 November 2025.
    22. 22.Burlacu, S.; Rădulescu, C.-V.; Bălu, E.P.; et al. Socio-Cultural Sustainability for Resilience in Public Services: Strategies for Achieving Inclusive and Equitable Service Delivery. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 12, 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n3p29
    23. 23.Govender, D.S. Lecturers' Adoption of AI in STEM Teaching for First-Year Undergraduate Students at a Private Higher Education Institution in South Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2025.
    24. 24.Dahri, N.A.; Yahaya, N.; Vighio, M.S.; et al. Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on teaching performance: Findings from SOR theory, SEM and IPMA analysis approach. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2025, 30, 18241–18276.
    25. 25.Fritz, A.; Long, C.; Herzog, M.; et al. Mismatch of the South African Foundation Phase Curriculum Demands and Learners' Current Knowledge. Afr. J. Res. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2020, 24, 10–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1724466
    26. 26.Adenuga, T.; Ayobami, A.T.; Mike-Olisa, U.; et al. Driving Smarter Development: Data-Driven Infrastructure Planning and Investment in Emerging and Developed Economies. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud. 2024, 3, 1753–1769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2023.3.6.4380
    27. 27.Maglasang, J. Evaluating Student Preparedness for the Integration of AI and Robotics in the Curriculum at STCTI. SSRN 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5364651
    28. 28.Kumar, M.S.; Krishnan, D.S.G. Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), and Behavioural Intention to Use (BIU): Mediating Effect of Attitude toward Use (AU) with Reference to Mobile Wallet Acceptance and Adoption in Rural India. SSRN 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640059
    29. 29.Michael, A.G. Open Distance Learning Epistemology through the Heideggerian Lens of Temporality. Niger. Online J. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 6, 493–510.
    30. 30.Dawadi, S. Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step-by-Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners. J. NELTA 2020, 25, 62–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
    ×