Blockchain-Based Land Tenure Systems: A Conceptual Model for Using Decentralized Technologies in Managing Land Rights and Ownership Disputes-Scilight

Land Management and Utilization

Review Article

Blockchain-Based Land Tenure Systems: A Conceptual Model for Using Decentralized Technologies in Managing Land Rights and Ownership Disputes

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/lmu.v1i2.1527
Volume 1 Issue 2 (2025)

Authors

  • Babu George

    School of Business, Alcorn State University, Lorman 39096, MS, USA

Received: 24 April 2025 | Revised: 23 May 2025 | Accepted: 1 June 2025 | Published Online: 12 June 2025

This study develops a conceptual framework for applying blockchain technology to land tenure systems, with the goal of enhancing transparency, equity, and dispute resolution. Land governance in many regions is plagued by fragmented records, legal pluralism, and the systemic exclusion of marginalized groups. Blockchain’s decentralized and immutable architecture offers significant promise for reform, yet its practical application requires more than technical innovation. Through a qualitative, literature-based methodology, the study synthesizes findings from global case examples to identify recurring challenges and enabling conditions for blockchain-enabled land systems. Key dimensions analyzed include legal recognition, participatory governance, digital identity, and geospatial data integration. The proposed framework comprises five interrelated components: a permissioned blockchain ledger, smart contracts mechanism, digital identity and access control, geospatial data integration, and inclusive governance architecture. Unlike techno-centric approaches, the model foregrounds social inclusion, legal interoperability, and the recognition of customary and collective land rights. It is theoretically grounded in legal pluralism, socio-technical systems theory, and data justice. Case examples from countries such as Georgia, Bangladesh, and Kenya demonstrate the framework’s relevance across varied contexts. The study contributes to the emerging discourse on digital land governance by proposing a justice-oriented, modular design that is adaptable to urban, rural, and post-conflict settings. It also cautions against premature or top-down adoption, emphasizing the importance of local engagement, institutional capacity, and legal harmonization in ensuring long-term success.

Keywords:

Blockchain Land Tenure Land Governance Decentralization Transparency Equity Legal Pluralism

References

  1. Clover, J., Eriksen, S., 2009. The effects of land tenure change on sustainability: human security and environmental change in southern African savannas. Environmental Science & Policy. 12(1), 53–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.10.012
  2. Fitzpatrick, D., 2016. Fragmented property systems. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 38(1), 3.
  3. Ocheje, P.D., 2007. “In the public interest”: forced evictions, land rights and human development in Africa. Journal of African Law. 51(2), 173–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855306000209
  4. Mitchell, D., Enemark, S., Van der Molen, P., 2015. Climate resilient urban development: Why responsible land governance is important. Land Use Policy. 48, 190–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.026
  5. Harvey, R., Chitonge, H., 2021. Land Tenure Challenges in Africa: Current and Emerging Issues. In: Chitonge, H., Harvey, R. (eds). Land Tenure Challenges in Africa. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp 325–339.
  6. Lawry, S., McLain, R., Rugadya, M., et al., 2023. Land Tenure Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa: Interventions in Benin, Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe. Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 40–54.
  7. Mwamba, C., 2024. Analysing Contemporary Land Tenure and the Impact of Land Reforms on Rural Peoples 'Livelihoods in Customary Land: A Case of Zambia [PhD Thesis]. Swansea: Swansea University. pp. 18–23.
  8. Valkonen, A., 2020. Examining sources of land tenure (in)security. A focus on authority relations, state politics, social dynamics and belonging. Land Use Policy. 101, 105191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105191
  9. Tesfaye, B., Simane, B., Zevenbergen, J., et al., 2023. Rethinking the Impact of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Land Disputes, Land Management, and Agricultural Production: Insights from South Wello, Ethiopia. Land. 12(9), 1713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091713
  10. Kisekka-Ntale, F., 2024. Institutions as Images of Political Authority and Power Hierarchies: Understanding Land Tenure Dynamics of State-making in Zimbabwe and Uganda. Journal of Land and Rural Studies. 12, 92–115.
  11. Quaye, B., 2021. Impacts of Socio-political Organisational Structures Underpinning Indigenous Land Tenure Systems: Evidence from Ghana. African Journal of Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences. 4(4), 571–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.334458
  12. Ameyaw, P.D., de Vries, W.T., 2021. Toward smart land management: Land acquisition and the associated challenges in Ghana. A look into a blockchain digital land registry for prospects. Land. 10(3), 239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030239
  13. George, B., Mattathil, A.P., 2025. Empowering African American Tourism Entrepreneurs with Generative AI: Bridging Innovation and Cultural Heritage. Societies. 15(2), 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020034
  14. Junaid, L., Bilal, K., Khalid, O., et al., 2023. Blockchain-Enabled land management systems. Telecommunication Systems. 84(3), 421–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-023-01032-2
  15. Racetin, I., Kilić Pamuković, J., Zrinjski, M., et al., 2022. Blockchain-based land management for sustainable development. Sustainability. 14(17), 10649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710649
  16. Payne, G., 2004. Land tenure and property rights: an introduction. Habitat International. 28(2), 167–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00066-3
  17. Rao, F, Spoor, M., Ma, X., et al., 2017. Perceived land tenure security in rural Xinjiang, China: The role of official land documents and trust. China Economic Review. 42, 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.03.009
  18. Payne, G., 2001. Urban land tenure policy options: titles or rights? Habitat International. 25(3), 415–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00014-5
  19. Home, R., 2012. Rights to Land Tenure. In: Smith, S.J. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 182–186.
  20. Dadashpoor, H., Ahani, S., 2019. Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review. Land Use Policy. 85, 218–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.051
  21. Shirzad, H., Barati, A.A., Ehteshammajd, S., et al., 2022. Agricultural land tenure system in Iran: An overview. Land Use Policy. 112, 106375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106375
  22. Johnson, O., 1972. Economic Analysis, the Legal Framework and Land Tenure Systems. The Journal of Law & Economics. 15(1), 259–276.
  23. Naughton-Treves, L., Wendland, K., 2014. Land Tenure and Tropical Forest Carbon Management. World Development. 55, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.010
  24. Katusiime, J., Schütt, B., 2020. Linking Land Tenure and Integrated Watershed Management—A Review. Sustainability. 12(4), 1667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041667
  25. George, B., Paul, J., 2020. Digital transformation in business and society. Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–7.
  26. Dong, S., Abbas, K., Li, M., et al., 2023. Blockchain technology and application: an overview. PeerJ Computer Science. 9, e1705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1705
  27. Shrimali, B., Patel, H., 2021. Blockchain state-of-the-art: architecture, use cases, consensus, challenges and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. 34(9), 6793–6807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.08.005
  28. Paliwal, M., Saraswdat, P., 2021. An Overview on Blockchain. International journal of innovative research in computer science & technology. 9(6), 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55524/IJIRCST.2021.9.6.29
  29. Monrat, A.A., Schelén, O., Andersson, K., 2019. A survey of blockchain from the perspectives of applications, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access. 7, 117134-51.
  30. Chambefort, C., Chaudey, M., 2024. Blockchain, tokens, smart contracts, and "decentralized autonomous organization": Expanding and renewing the mechanisms of governance? European Management Review. 21(3), 511–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12677
  31. Mamulak, N., Miswadi, M., Julinaldi, J., et al., 2024. Blockchain Technology: Unlocking New Frontiers in Data Management and Transparency. Global International Journal of Innovative Research. 2(9), 2257–2270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i9.328
  32. Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., Potts, J., 2018. Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics. 14(4), 639–658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200
  33. Guo, H., Yu, X., 2022. A Survey on Blockchain Technology and its security. Blockchain: Research and Applications. 3(2), 100067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100067
  34. Daniel, D., Ifejika Speranza, C., 2020. The role of blockchain in documenting land users' rights: The canonical case of farmers in the vernacular land market. Front Blockchain. 3, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00019
  35. Konashevych, O., 2020. Constraints and benefits of the blockchain use for real estate and property rights. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law. 12(2), 109–127.
  36. Crandall, J., 2023. Living on the block: How equitable is tokenized equity? Big Data & Society. 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231208455
  37. Taylor, L., 2017. What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society. 4(2), 2053951717736335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
  38. Zhaofeng, M., Lingyun, W., Xiaochang, W., et al., 2019. Blockchain-enabled decentralized trust management and secure usage control of IoT big data. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 7(5). 4000–4015.
  39. Gao, J., Yu, H., Zhu, X., et al., 2021. Blockchain-Based Digital Rights Management Scheme via Multiauthority Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption and Proxy Re-Encryption. IEEE Systems Journal. 15(4), 5233–5244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2021.3064356
  40. Eder, G., Eder, A., 2019. Digital transformation: blockchain and land titles. Proceedings of 2019 OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum; March 20–March 21, 2019; Paris, France. pp. 20–21.
  41. Adade, D., De Vries, W., 2023. Digital Twin for Active Stakeholder Participation in Land-Use Planning. Land. 12(3), 538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030538
  42. Goyal, A., Singh, U., 2024. A Study of Implementation of Blockchain Technology in Land Registration: A SWOT Analysis. In: Dalal, S., Dahiya, N., Jaglan, V., Koundal, D., Le, D.-N. (eds.). Reshaping Intelligent Business and Industry: Convergence of AI and IoT at the Cutting Edge. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 519–530.
  43. Verheye, B., 2020. Land registration in the twenty-first century: blockchain land registers from a civil law perspective. In: Lehavi, A., Levine-Schnur, R. (eds). Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 123–135.
  44. Rodima-Taylor, D., 2021. Digitalizing land administration: The geographies and temporalities of infrastructural promise. Geoforum. 122, 140–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.04.003
  45. Alam, K.M., Rahman, J.A., Tasnim, A., et al., 2022. A blockchain-based land title management system for Bangladesh. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. 34(6), 3096–3110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.011
  46. Rashid, M.R.A., Al Rafi, A., Islam, M.A., et al., 2025. Enhancing land management policy in Bangladesh: A blockchain-based framework for transparent and efficient land management. Land Use Policy. 150, 107436. DOi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107436
  47. Joysoyal, R., Uddin, S.S., Islam, T., et al., 2024. Blockchain for sustainable city transformation: A review on Bangladesh. Engineering Reports. 6(9), e12948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12948
  48. Romanello, M., 2021. Blockchain technology in Africa: problems and perspectives Tecnologia Blockchain na África: problemas e perspectivas. Brazilian Journal of Development. 7(7), 74359–74377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n7-560
  49. Boiardi, P., Stout, E., 2021. To what extent can blockchain help development co-operation actors meet the 2030 Agenda? Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/to-what-extent-can-blockchain-help-development-co-operation-actors-meet-the-2030-agenda_11857cb5-en.html (cited 4 March 2025).
  50. Wang, Y., Qiu, W., Dong, L., et al., 2020. Proxy signature-based management model of sharing energy storage in blockchain environment. Applied Sciences. 10(21), 7502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217502
  51. Lemieux, V.L., 2017. Evaluating the use of blockchain in land transactions: An archival science perspective. European Property Law Journal. 6(3), 392–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2017-0019
  52. Mendi, A.F., Çabuk, A., 2020. Blockchain applications in geographical information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 86(1), 6–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.86.1.5
  53. McMurren, J., Young, A., Verhulst, S., 2018. Addressing transaction costs through blockchain and identity in Swedish land transfers. Available from: https://blockchan.ge/blockchange-land-registry.pdf (cited 31 March 2025).
  54. Proskurovska, A., Dörry, S., 2022. The blockchain challenge for Sweden's housing and mortgage markets. Environment and Planning A: Economy Space. 54(8), 1569–1585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221116896
  55. Thakur, V., Doja, M., Dwivedi, Y., et al., 2020. Land records on Blockchain for implementation of Land Titling in India. International Journal of Information Management. 52, 101940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.013
  56. Raina, S., Kaur, S., 2022. Land Registry and Title Management using Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Proceedings of 2022 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS); November 4–November 5, 2022; Greater Noida, India. pp. 110–113.
  57. Chesang, E., Masese, N., Rugiri, P., 2024. Implementing a Secure Title Deed Registration Model for Land Transactions in Blockchain. Journal of Computer Science and Technology (JCST). 2(1), 32–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51317/jcst.v2i1.618
  58. Amri, F., Sihombing, P., Efendi, S., 2023. Blockchain in Land Registry. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram. 11(1), 218–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i1.6537
  59. Geels, F.W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy. 31(8):1257–1274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  60. Merry, S.E., 1988. Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review. 22(5), 869–896.