Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Article

Technological Challenges and Opportunities in Trilingual Pedagogy in Teaching Grade 10 Dramatic Arts: Insights from Educators Using Nearpod

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i2.2280
Sincuba, L. (2026). Technological Challenges and Opportunities in Trilingual Pedagogy in Teaching Grade 10 Dramatic Arts: Insights from Educators Using Nearpod. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 5(2), 274–299. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i2.2280
Volume 5 Issue 2: June 2026 (in progress)
Copyright (c) 2026 Limkani Sincuba
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Digital Technologies Research and Applications (DTRA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by DTRA agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source are properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, and transform the content.

Authors

  • Limkani Sincuba

    Department of Education, iYunivesithi Walter Sisulu, Mthatha 5099, South Africa

Received: 11 January 2026; Revised: 13 February 2026; Accepted: 18 March 2026; Published: 1 June 2026

Languages can be intertwined in the dramatic arts. Language is a vital human tool for communication. The study explored the challenges and opportunities of trilingual pedagogy, which bridges English, isiXhosa, and isiZulu, in Grade 10 dramatic arts education through Nearpod. By employing a mixed-methods approach, qualitative through a case study of one school and quantitative through a survey of the same school, this investigation provides rich insights into the experiences and perspectives of three educators and eighteen students, as captured through comprehensive focus group interviews. The study aims to uncover both the hurdles and the prospects of implementing multilingual teaching strategies in the dramatic arts. The study was grounded in an interpretive paradigm and underpinned by Vygotsky’s theory. The research highlights Nearpod's role in coordinating multilingual instruction, including scaffolded activities, virtual rehearsals, and real-time polls for language switching during dramatic exercises. Data collection was carried out through focus group interviews and a survey. The collected responses were analysed using ATLAS.ti and thematically. The analysis facilitated the identification and extraction of key themes from participants’ insights. Study findings revealed that challenges included developing trilingual resources and ensuring device access. The study concluded that proactive, collaborative strategies can help educators leverage trilingualism. To utilise trilingual pedagogy on Nearpod, recommendations include teacher training on platform features like Matching Pairs for vocabulary and Time to Climb gamification. The study recommends funding for multilingual content creation and devices. Collaboration among curriculum developers and educators is critical. By proactively leveraging Nearpod, educators could transform trilingual dramatic arts education.

Keywords:

Challenges Dramatic Arts Education Multilingual Nearpod Technology Translanguaging Trilingual Pedagogy

References

  1. Yelenevskaya, M.; Protassova, E. Teaching languages in multicultural surroundings: New tendencies. Russ. J. Linguist. 2021, 25, 546–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/26-0088-2021-25-2-546-568
  2. Batdi, V.; Elaldi, S. Effects of Drama Method on Social Communication Skills: A Comparative Analysis. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 2020, 6, 435–457.
  3. Thao, G. Reimagining Professional Development to Be Culturally Responsive-Sustaining for Educators of Multilingual Multicultural Students; University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/2104167
  4. Frederick, J.K.; Rogers, V.R.; Raabe, G.R. Commitment, collaboration, and problem resolution to promote and sustain access to multifaceted applied behavior-analytic services utilizing telepractice. Behav. Anal. Pract. 2022, 15, 347–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00550-8
  5. Bhatti, M.A.; Alzahrani, S.A. Navigating Linguistic Barriers: Exploring the Experiences of Host National Connectedness among Multilingual Individuals. Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist. 2023, 9, 96–112.
  6. Ramadhan, A.P.; Fibriana, F. Nearpod Integration in Science Learning for Junior High School Students: A Review. J. Pijar Mipa 2025, 20, 783–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i4.9253
  7. Zhussupova, R.; Shadiev, R. Digital storytelling to facilitate academic public speaking skills: Case study in culturally diverse multilingual classroom. J. Comput. Educ. 2023, 10, 499–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00259-x
  8. Sincuba, L.; Buka, A.M. Enhancing Trilingual Pedagogy in Teaching Dramatic Arts: Insights from Educators. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 2024, 23, 403–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.21
  9. Cingo, S.I. A Case Study of Grade 6 Multilingual Students' Experiences with Monolingual Assessment Practices in a Working-Class Township School in Cape Town. Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town (UCT), Cape Town, South Africa, 2022.
  10. Vygotsky, L.S.; Cole, M. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  11. Olsen, D. Media Arts Education: Transforming Education through Multimodal Cognition, Holistic Learning, and Techno-Embodiment; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003430834
  12. Gibson, R.; Ewing, R. Transforming the Curriculum through the Arts; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52797-6
  13. Alisaari, J.; Bergroth, M.; Heikkola, L.M. Educators’ views on students’ multilingual resources-tracking the impact of curriculum reform. J. Curric. Stud. 2025, 25, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2560843
  14. Ticheloven, A.; Blom, E.; Leseman, P.; et al. Translanguaging challenges in multilingual classrooms: Scholar, teacher and student perspectives. Int. J. Multiling. 2021, 18, 491–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1686002
  15. Dooly, M.; Vinagre, M. Research into practice: Virtual exchange in language teaching and learning. Lang. Teach. 2022, 55, 392–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000069
  16. Onishchuk, I.; Ikonnikova, M.; Antonenko, T.; et al. Characteristics of foreign language education in foreign countries and ways of applying foreign experience in pedagogical universities of Ukraine. Rev. Rom. Educ. Multidimens. 2020, 12, 44–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308
  17. Hawari, A.D.M.; Noor, A.I.M. Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 2020, 16, 102–111.
  18. Garzón, J.; Kinshuk; Baldiris, S.; et al. How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2020, 31, 100334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
  19. Papadakis, S.; Semerikov, S.O.; Striuk, A.M.; et al. Embracing Digital Innovation and Cloud Technologies for Transformative Learning Experiences. In Proceedings of the CTE 2023: 11th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 22 December 2023.
  20. Semerikov, S.O.; Striuk, A.M. Augmented Reality in Education 2023: Innovations, applications, and future directions. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 17 May 2023.
  21. Sdg, U. Sustainable development goals. The energy progress report Tracking SDG. Energy Prog. Rep. 2019, 7, 2–6.
  22. Striuk, A.M. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2023); CEUR-WS.org: Aachen, Germany, 2023.
  23. Kramarenko, T.H.; Pylypenko, O.S.; Moiseienko, M.V. Enhancing mathematics education with GeoGebra and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 17 May 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4534
  24. Hutagalung, T.; Adisaputera, A.A.; Tansliova, L.; et al. Transforming drama education through Nearpod: Development of interactive teaching materials for university students. JTP-J. Teknol. Pendidik. 2024, 26, 985–1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.50362
  25. Tseng, J.-J.; Chai, C.S.; Tan, L.; et al. A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK)in language teaching. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2022, 35, 948–971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531
  26. Uğraş, H.; Uğraş, M.; Papadakis, S.; et al. ChatGPT-supported education in primary schools: The potential of ChatGPT for sustainable practices. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229855
  27. Perales-Fernández-de-Gamboa, A.; Orcasitas-Vicandi, M. Language teaching in the 21st century: incorporating culturally sustaining pedagogies for social and cognitive justice in education. Appl. Linguist. Rev. 2024, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0208
  28. Rebihi, N.; Guidoum, K. Interactive and Pedagogical Challenges Faced by Primary School Educators Instructing Simultaneously English and French: A Case Study of Third-Year Pupils. PhD Thesis, Ibn Khaldoun University-Tiaret, Tiaret, Algeria, 2024.
  29. Wlosowicz, T.M. The Use of Elements of Translanguaging in Teaching Third or Additional Languages: Some Advantages and Limitations. Multidiscip. J. Sch. Educ. 2020, 9, 135–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2020.0917.08
  30. Erling, E.J.; Clegg, J.; Rubagumya, C.M.; et al. Multilingual Learning and Language Supportive Pedagogies in Sub-Saharan Africa; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003028383
  31. Mendoza, A. Translanguaging and English as a Lingua Franca in the Plurilingual Classroom; Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413443
  32. Gobodwana, A. The Use of Translanguaging in Assisting Educators to Teach African Languages: A Case Study of Tshwane South Education District, Pretoria. PhD Thesis, University of Cape Town (UCT), Cape Town, South Africa, 2023.
  33. Danckwardt-Lillieström, K.; Andrée, M.; Enghag, M. The drama of chemistry–supporting student explorations of electronegativity and chemical bonding through creative drama in upper secondary school. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2020, 42, 1862–1894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1792578
  34. Dima, A.; Kaiafa, E.; Tsiaras, A. Drama education through storytelling strategy develops students’ critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, Oxford, UK, 11–14 March 2021.
  35. Beatty, L.E. Learning from the Experiences of Multilingual Educators of Multilingual Students in Early Childhood. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA, 2024.
  36. Bsharat, T.R.; Barahmeh, M.Y. The influence of applying educational active drama in enhancing speaking skills in teaching-learning English language: A theoretical response. Technium Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 14, 10–32.
  37. Rodriguez, R. A Translingual Approach to the Theory and Practice of Basic Writing. PhD Thesis, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3610
  38. Sandstead, M.G. Transformative Pedagogies of Voice: Creating the Conditions for Voice in Bilingual Students' Writing. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, 2023.
  39. Lehtonen, A. Drama as an interconnecting approach for climate change education. Kasvatustieteellisiä Tutkimuksia 2021, 118.
  40. Hurst, E.; Mona, M. “Translanguaging” as a Socially Just Pedogy. Educ. Change 2017, 21, 126–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2017/2015
  41. Curtis, B. And the Performance Speaks: (Re) Interpreting and (Re) Presenting Student and Teacher Lived Experiences of Drama Assessment within Further Education. PhD Thesis, The University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK, 2023.
  42. Palmer, S.; McKinney, J.; Di Benedetto, S.A. Extended Reality Performance: Scenographic Practice in Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies; Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK, 2025.
  43. Trinidad, J.E.; Ngo, G.R.; Nevada, A.M.; et al. Engaging and/or effective? Students’ evaluation of pedagogical practices in higher education. Coll. Teach. 2020, 68, 161–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1769017
  44. Wang, D. Multilingualism and Translanguaging in Chinese Language Classrooms; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018.
  45. Rusdiansyah; Gunawan, W.; Kurniawan, E.; et al. Navigating inconsistencies: The challenges of implementing multilingual education policy in rural Indonesia. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2025, 11, 101601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101601
  46. Caliz, O.S. Exploring Multilingual Pedagogies in Belizean Language Arts Classrooms; Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK, USA, 2024.
  47. García-Mateus, S. Bilingual student perspectives about language expertise in a gentrifying two-way immersion program. Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling. 2023, 26, 34–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1797627
  48. Ritchie, L.A. Translanguaging with ‘Monolingual’ Educators and Heterogeneous Multilingual Students: Forging New Pedagogies with Shakespeare. PhD Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2023.
  49. González-Rodríguez, M.; Otero-Cerdeira, L.; González-Rufino, E.; et al. Study and evaluation of CPU scheduling algorithms. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29959
  50. Zhang, R.; Chan, B.H.-S. Pedagogical translanguaging in a trilingual context: The case of two EFL classrooms in a Xinjiang university. Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling. 2022, 25, 2805–2816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1978383
  51. Khanyile, S.; Awung, F. Challenges of Mother-tongue Education in IsiZulu: A Case Study of Selected Schools in uThungulu District of Kwazulu-Natal. Afr. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Stud. 2023, 5, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v5i1.1069
  52. Kormos, J.; Smith, A.M. Teaching Languages to Students with Specific Learning Differences; Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/kormos8615
  53. Zhang, H.; Huang, F.; Wang, C. Language choice and code-switching in bilingual children’s interaction under multilingual contexts: Evidence from Mandarin-English bilingual preschoolers. Int. J. Multiling. 2025, 22, 860–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2340749
  54. Özoğul, T.; Sezerel, H.; Aktaş, S.G.; et al. Learning through creative drama in vocational hospitality education: Efficiency, retention, and attitudes. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 36, 100728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100728
  55. Lems, K.; Soro, T.M.; Charles, G. Building Literacy with Multilingual Learners: Insights from Linguistics; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2024.2427122
  56. Tsokalidou, R.; Skourtou, E. Translanguaging as a culturally sustaining pedagogical approach: Bi/multilingual educators’ perspectives. In Inclusion, Education and Translanguaging; Springer: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28128-1_13
  57. Goodman, B.; Tastanbek, S. Making the shift from a codeswitching to a translanguaging lens in English language teacher education. TESOL Q. 2021, 55, 29–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.571
  58. Lauwo, M.S.; Accurso, K.; Rajagopal, H. Plurilingualism, equity, and pre-service teacher identity: Centring [linguistic] diversity in teacher education. TESL Can. J. 2022, 38, 113–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v38i2.1359
  59. Marti Arnandiz, O.; Portolés Falomir, L. The effect of individual factors on L3 educators’ beliefs about multilingual education. Lang. Cult. Curric. 2022, 35, 353–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1999463
  60. Haught, J.R. Sociocultural Theory and Language Learning as Performance: Teaching and Learning Additional Languages through Performing Arts; Bloomsbury Publishing PLC: London, UK, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978730717
  61. Norton, T.C.; Rodriguez, D.C.; Howell, C.; et al. ‘Maybe we can turn the tide’: An explanatory mixed-methods study to understand how knowledge brokers mobilise health evidence in low-and middle-income countries. Evid. Policy 2021, 17, 9–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419x15679622689515
  62. Shi, Y. Multimodal teaching in digital media arts education: Insights and challenges from educators’ perspectives. Cogent Educ. 2025, 12, 2590849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2590849
  63. Satri, P.; Hidayah, J.; Edy, S. The Use of Digital Technology to Support the Integrated English Language Learning in Merdeka Curriculum at SMP Negeri 1 Rejang Lebong; Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup: Curup, Indonesia, 2025.
  64. Gazioglu, M.; Cole, M.W. Intersecting ideologies: A case study of educators’ language beliefs and practices with trilingual students. Int. Multiling. Res. J. 2024, 19, 261–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2024.2374963
  65. Creswell, J.W.; Poth, C.N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016.
  66. Creswell, J.W.; Inoue, M. A process for conducting mixed methods data analysis. J. Gen. Fam. Med. 2025, 26, 4–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.736
  67. Smit, B. Introduction to ATLAS.ti for Mixed Analysis. In The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 331–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203729434-28
  68. Vanicek, T.; Popelka, S. The think-aloud method for evaluating the usability of a regional atlas. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030095
  69. Smit, B.; Scherman, V. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software for scoping reviews: A case of ATLAS.ti. SAGE Open 2021, 16094069211019140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019140
  70. Paulus, T.M.; Lester, J.N. Using software to support qualitative data analysis. In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; pp. 420–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977159.00048
  71. Yilmaz, T. Translanguaging as a pedagogy for equity of language minoritized students. Int. J. Multiling. 2021, 18, 435–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1640705
  72. Dafouz, E.; Smit, U. Towards multilingualism in English-medium higher education: A student perspective. J. Engl.-Med. Instr. 2022, 1, 29–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21018.daf
  73. Husband, G. Ethical data collection and recognizing the impact of semi-structured interviews on research respondents. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206
  74. Jackman, P.C.; Schweickle, M.; Goddard, S.; et al. The event-focused interview: What is it, why is it useful, and how is it used? Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 2022, 14, 167–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2021.1904442
  75. Herbst, R.S.; Frizzarini, S.T.; Herbst, G.M. ATLAS.ti® in qualitative research: Expanding horizons in oral history analysis. Seven Editora 2024, 974–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.010-062
  76. Mohamad, A.M.; Yan, F.Y.Y.; Aziz, N.A.; et al. Inductive-Deductive Reasoning in Qualitative Analysis using ATLAS.ti: Trending Cybersecurity Twitter Data Analytics. In Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology, Belgaum, India, 27–29 May 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/incet54531.2022.9824944
  77. Li, Y.; Zhang, S. Qualitative data analysis. In Applied Research Methods in Urban and Regional Planning; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 149–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93574-0_8
  78. Gupta, A. Qualitative Methods and Data Analysis Using ATLAS.ti; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49650-9
  79. Fearnley, C.J. Mind mapping in qualitative data analysis: Managing interview data in interdisciplinary and multi-sited research projects. Geo Geogr. Environ. 2022, 9, e00109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.109
  80. Rodríguez-Dorans, E.; Jacobs, P. Making narrative portraits: A methodological approach to analysing qualitative data. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2020, 23, 611–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1719609
  81. Peel, K.L. A beginner’s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2020, 25.
  82. Rodríguez-Izquierdo, R.M.; Falcón, I.G.; Permisán, C.G. Teacher beliefs and approaches to linguistic diversity. Spanish as a second language in the inclusion of immigrant students. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2020, 90, 103035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103035
  83. Newman, P.A.; Guta, A.; Black, T. Ethical considerations for qualitative research methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergency situations: Navigating the virtual field. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021, 20, 16094069211047823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047823
  84. May, T.; Perry, B. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process; McGraw-Hill Education: London, UK, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2348595
  85. Muzari, T.; Shava, G.N.; Shonhiwa, S. Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 3, 14–20.