Integrating Technological and Behavioral Perspectives in the Adoption of China’s Digital Currency (e-CNY): A Systematic Literature Review

Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Review

Integrating Technological and Behavioral Perspectives in the Adoption of China’s Digital Currency (e-CNY): A Systematic Literature Review

Shen, A., Mohd Taib, H., & Murugiah, L. (2026). Integrating Technological and Behavioral Perspectives in the Adoption of China’s Digital Currency (e-CNY): A Systematic Literature Review. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i1.2159

Authors

  • Ao Shen

    School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia
  • Hasniza Mohd Taib

    School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia
  • Logasvathi Murugiah

    School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia

Received: 25 December 2025; Revised: 26 January 2026; Accepted: 6 February 2026; Published: 24 February 2026

Despite rapid pilot expansion, public uptake of China’s central bank digital currency, e-CNY, remains uneven. This study synthesizes evidence on e-CNY adoption and develops an integrative perspective that connects technology acceptance with behavioral and cognitive mechanisms. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and CNKI for studies published from January 2014 to December 2025. After screening and eligibility assessment, 62 studies were included and coded using thematic synthesis. The evidence converges on three determinant clusters: technological adaptability (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions), behavioral and cognitive determinants (institutional trust, perceived risk, financial literacy, awareness), and contextual moderators (merchant acceptance, policy communication, regional infrastructure, and demographics). Across studies, institutional trust and perceived risk show the most consistent and substantial associations with adoption intention, while effective government communication and a dense merchant ecosystem reduce uncertainty and strengthen perceived usefulness. Building on these findings, we propose an integrative framework that links Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) constructs to behavioral and cognitive mechanisms and outline a Theory–Context–Characteristics–Methodology (TCCM)-based agenda for future research on CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) adoption dynamics. The results offer actionable implications for central banks on privacy design, communication strategies, and inclusion-oriented deployment to support sustainable CBDC diffusion. The review also highlights gaps in post adoption behavior, privacy perception measurement, and cross-regional comparisons, and calls for longitudinal, experimental, and mixed method designs to validate causal mechanisms in real world CBDC use.

Keywords:

e-CNY Central Bank Digital Currency UTAUT Behavioral Finance Adoption Intention Institutional Trust Perceived Risk

References

  1. Bai, H.; Cong, L.W.; Luo, M.; et al. Adoption of central bank digital currencies: Initial evidence from China. J. Corp. Finance 2025, 91, 102735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102735
  2. Ngo, V.; Nguyen, P.; Nguyen, H.; et al. Governance and monetary policy impacts on public acceptance of CBDC adoption. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 2023, 64, 101865.
  3. Scollan, B.; Darling, E. Designing digital currency wallets for broad adoption. J. Payments Strategy Syst. 2023, 17, 96–106.
  4. Cheng, P. Decoding the rise of central bank digital currency in China: designs, problems, and prospects. J. Bank. Regul. 2023, 24, 156–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00193-5
  5. Auer, R.; Frost, J.; Gambacorta, L.; et al. Central bank digital currencies: Motives, economic implications, and the research frontier. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2022, 14, 697–721.
  6. Kim, T.B.; Ho, C.-T.B. Validating the moderating role of age in multi-perspective acceptance model of wearable healthcare technology. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 61, 101603.
  7. Cheng, X.; Song, Z. Digital payments adoption in emerging markets: The context of China’s digital currency electronic payment. J. Econ. Manag. Trade 2023, 29, 105–130.
  8. Wang, H. How to understand China's approach to central bank digital currency? Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2023, 50, 105788.
  9. Xinhua. China's digital RMB transactions top 14.2 trillion yuan. Available online: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202510/29/content_WS6901a9c9c6d00ca5f9a0726a.html (accessed on 22 December 2025).
  10. Bhattacharya, D. Digital Yuan (e-CNY): China’s official digital currency. Strateg. Anal. 2022, 46, 93–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2039582
  11. Broby, D. Central bank digital currencies: Lessons from China. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2024, 40, 699–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6688/jise.202407_40(4).0002
  12. Liu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wu, G.; et al. Determinants of individuals’ intentions to use central bank digital currency: Evidence from China. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2024, 36, 2213–2227.
  13. Kulal, A.; Parvin, S.R.; Dinesh, S.; et al. Developing a digital currency adoption scale: A validity and reliability study. Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100422.
  14. Sha, C.; Che, T.; Xu, T.; et al. Antecedents of users’ switching intention to central bank digital currency: A push-pull-mooring model perspective. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2024, 68, 101467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101467
  15. Chu, Y.; Rathbun, N.S. Monetary sovereignty and central bank digital currencies: Competing models for future cross-border payment platforms. Glob. Policy 2025, 16, 329–340.
  16. Davoodalhosseini, S.M. Central bank digital currency and monetary policy. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 2022, 142, 104150.
  17. Hoang, V.H.; Phan, L.H.T. Digital banking adoption and financial inclusion in Vietnam: A multi-dimensional analysis of user perceptions and socioeconomic factors. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Stud. 2024, 7, 6436–6450.
  18. Zhang, J. Impact of digital yuan (e-CNY) promotion on traditional banking: Challenges and response strategies. Law Econ. 2025, 4, 24–37.
  19. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.; Davis, G.; et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478.
  20. Liu, M.; Wang, C.; Hu, J. Understanding older adults’ adoption of facial recognition payment: An integrated model of TAM and UXT. PLoS One 2025, 20, e0325291.
  21. Huang, Y.; Qiu, W.; Yang, W.; et al. A study on the development path and promotion measures of E-CNY. In Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet and Digital Economy (ICAID 2023), 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-222-4_23
  22. Kshetri, N. China’s digital yuan: Motivations of the Chinese government and potential global effects. J. Contemp. China 2022, 32, 1–19.
  23. Liu, M.; Deng, L.; Duan, N. Factors influencing adoption intentions of digital currency: A qualitative study from China. Res. Sq. 2025, 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6947203/v1
  24. Amin, R.; Hossain, M.A.; Hossain, M.; et al. Adoption of central bank digital currency: An empirical investigation of trialability efficacy on Digital Yuan. Digit. Transform. Soc. 2025, 4.
  25. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  26. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  27. Thomas, J.; Harden, A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2008, 8, 45.
  28. Lyu, W.; Liu, Y.M.; Jiang, Y.; et al. e-CNY and digital economy in China. J. Adv. Res. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2023, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61841/g15vgt84
  29. Chen, B.; Ma, Z.; Dang, M.; et al. Antecedents of E-CNY adoption in China: A cluster analysis-based UTAUT model. Chin. Econ. 2025, 58, 440–457.
  30. Kamboj, S.; Matharu, M.; Shukla, Y. Examining the effect of perceived risk, self-efficacy and individual differences on consumer intention to use contactless mobile payment services. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2025, 16, 650–681.
  31. Wang, D.; Su, H. Impacts of merchant acceptance with consumers’ perceived trust and risk in adopting central bank digital currency in China. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 1–46.
  32. Kumari, V.; Bala, P.K.; Chakraborty, S. An empirical study of user adoption of cryptocurrency using blockchain technology: Analysing role of success factors like technology awareness and financial literacy. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 1580–1600.
  33. Mullappallykayamkulath, M.A. Digital financial literacy and its impact on the financial behaviour of millennials: An empirical investigation. Int. J. Financ. Manag. 2022, 12, 3.
  34. Hu, S.; Liu, D. Digital economy, financial literacy, and financial risk-taking in rural households. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance 2025, 98, 103922.
  35. Cham, T.-H.; Cheah, J.-H.; Cheng, B.; et al. I am too old for this! Barriers contributing to the non-adoption of mobile payment. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2022, 40, 1017–1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2021-0283