Advancing Sociocultural Competence in Linguistics Education through Global Simulation Enhanced by Natural Language Processing and Speech Recognition Technologies

Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Article

Advancing Sociocultural Competence in Linguistics Education through Global Simulation Enhanced by Natural Language Processing and Speech Recognition Technologies

Downloads

https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i1.1964
Khakimova, M., Mamarajabov, S., Fayzullaeva, N., Ochilova, G., Musakhanova, G., Akbarova, S., Kayumova, M., Khojiyeva, I., & Begmatov, D. (2026). Advancing Sociocultural Competence in Linguistics Education through Global Simulation Enhanced by Natural Language Processing and Speech Recognition Technologies. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 5(1), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i1.1964
Volume 5 Issue 1: March 2026 (in progress)
Copyright (c) 2026 Mukhabbat Khakimova, Shavkat Mamarajabov, Nilufar Fayzullaeva, Gulnoza Ochilova, Gulnora Musakhanova, Sayyora Akbarova, Mekhribonu Kayumova, Iroda Khojiyeva, Davlat Begmatov
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

License

Digital Technologies Research and Applications (DTRA)  publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by DTRA agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for any purpose, including commercial use. As long as the author and original source are properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, and transform the content.

Authors

  • Mukhabbat Khakimova

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Shavkat Mamarajabov

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Nilufar Fayzullaeva

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Gulnoza Ochilova

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Gulnora Musakhanova

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Sayyora Akbarova

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Mekhribonu Kayumova

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Iroda Khojiyeva

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan
  • Davlat Begmatov

    Department of Economic Theory, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, Uzbekistan

Received: 30 November 2025; Revised: 21 January 2026; Accepted: 2 February 2026; Published: 3 March 2026

This study examines the development of sociocultural competence among international linguistics students learning English as a second foreign language through global simulation supported by Natural Language Processing (NLP) and speech recognition technologies. Sociocultural competence is defined as the capacity to communicate effectively and appropriately across cultural contexts and is assessed through indicators such as intercultural awareness, context-sensitive language use, communicative adaptability, and pragmatically appropriate choices. The instructional intervention integrates NLP techniques including text classification, semantic similarity analysis, and language modeling to generate real-time feedback on the cultural appropriateness of learners’ responses. Speech recognition technology is employed to analyze oral production and to support immediate corrective guidance across varying proficiency levels. Simulation tasks are structured around authentic intercultural dilemmas and role-based interactions, with methodological precautions taken to reduce cultural bias and stereotyping. A quasi-experimental design (n = 32) compares technology-enhanced simulation with conventional instruction. Data are collected through validated assessment rubrics, pre- and post-test measures, and interaction logs to quantify changes in sociocultural performance. Findings indicate measurable improvement in students’ intercultural communicative competence in the experimental group, suggesting that AI-supported simulation can strengthen both linguistic accuracy and sociocultural appropriateness beyond traditional classroom practices. The study also addresses ethical considerations related to data privacy and speech processing. Although limited by sample size and institutional scope, the research offers a replicable framework for integrating computational tools into linguistics education and highlights directions for broader, cross-contextual implementation.

Keywords:

Global Simulation Sociocultural Competence Natural Language Processing Speech Recognition Technologies Linguistics Education Technology-Enhanced Language Learning

References

  1. Cicurel, F. The conquest of meaning or the metalinguistic nature of communication in the language classroom. Fr. Monde 1984, 23, 72–86.
  2. Zvarych, I.; Tonkonoh, I.; Bopko, I.; et al. The effectiveness of using simulation in learning a foreign language. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2024, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.1916
  3. Veselova, P.N. Potential of Using Global Simulation Technology as Effective Means of Developing Communicative Competence in Foreign Students at All Levels of Russian as a Second Language Proficiency. Philol. Theory Pract. 2021, 14, 563–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210051
  4. Usacheva, E.A. Didactic Simulation as a Means of Teaching Foreign Language Speech. In Proceedings of the Conference Actual Problems of RomanoGermanic Philology and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, Lipetsk, Russia, 23 October 2020; pp. 76–81.
  5. Veselovskaya, T.S.; Veselova, P.N.; Rodionova, K.E. Global Simulation Technology on the Kumospace Platform as an Effective Means of Developing Student Autonomy and Linguistic and Cultural Competence. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Congress “Russian Language in CIS Countries: Status, Functioning, Communication”, Moscow, Russia, 1–3 November 2022; pp. 150–153.
  6. Jones, K. Simulations in Language Teaching; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; p. 4.
  7. Debyser, F. L’immeuble (The Building); Hachette: New York, NY, USA, 1996; p. 95. (in French)
  8. Hall, C.J.; Newbrand, D.; Ecke, P.; et al. Learners’ Implicit Assumptions About Syntactic Frames in New L3 Words: The Role of Cognates, Typological Proximity, and L2 Status. Lang. Learn. 2009, 59, 153–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00503.x
  9. Hyland, K. Language learning simulations: A practical guide. Engl. Teach. Forum 1993, 31, 16–21.
  10. Archibald, A.M. Using simulation activities in advanced level English classes. D. Fremdsprachl. Unterr. Engl. 1997, 2, 34–38.
  11. Caré, J.-M. Invent to learn - Global simulations. D. Neueren Sprachen 1995, 94, 69–87. (in French)
  12. Sippel, V.A. Holistic Learning within the Framework of Global Simulation: Principles–Experiences–Suggestions; Gunter Narr Verlag: Tübingen, Germany, 2003. (in German)
  13. Sanchez, D.R.; Rueda, A.; Kawasaki, K.; et al. Reviewing Simulation Technology: Implications for Workplace Training. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2023, 7, 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050050
  14. Jallad, S.T. Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education on Educational Practices of Communication Skills, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence Among Undergraduate Nursing Students. Creat. Nurs. 2025, 31, 135–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535241301115
  15. Wang, Y.-C. Acquiring the English Language through Web-Based Role-Playing Simulations: Informal Learning in Interactive Environments. Int. J. Engl. Lang. Educ. 2014, 2, 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v2i2.5932
  16. Bagheri, M. The effects of task design variables and corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing complexity and accuracy. Cogent Educ. 2024, 11, 2310433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2310433
  17. Vlčková, I. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Foreign Languages. ACC J. 2023, 29, 124–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acc-2023-0020
  18. Holmes, W.; Bialik, M.; Fadel, C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Prospects and Challenges for Teaching and Learning; Alpina PRO: Moscow, Russia, 2022.
  19. Shawaqfeh, A.T.; Jameel, A.S.; Al-adwan, L.A.Y.; et al. Interaction as a Mechanism to Enhance English Language Proficiency in the Classroom. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2023, 15, 229–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.25
  20. Azimov, E.G.; Shchukin, A.N. New Dictionary of Methodological Terms and Concepts (Theory and Practice of Language Teaching); IKAR Publ.: Moscow, Russia, 2009. (in Russian)
  21. Baymanov, X. Implementation of intercultural and cognitive-communicative communication in the study of foreign languages. Mod. Sci. Res. 2024, 3, 1–5.
  22. Egitim, S. Does language teachers’ intercultural competence influence oral participation in EFL classrooms?: Unveiling learner perspectives through a mixed methods inquiry. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev. 2025, 46, 2778–2793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2306169
  23. Ariyan, M.A.; Gorobinskaya, N.V. Online Collaborative Learning as a Way of Boosting Language and Teaching Proficiency. In Handbook of Research on Curriculum Reform Initiatives in English Education; IGI Global Scientific Publishing.: London, UK, 2019; pp. 104–121.
  24. Regan, V.; Terry, K.K. The Acquisition of L2 Sociolinguistic Competence: Critical Insights from an Evolving Field. Languages 2025, 10, 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10060133
  25. Tang, K.H.D. Student-centered Approach in Teaching and Learning: What Does It Really Mean? Acta Pedagog. Asiana 2023, 2, 72–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
  26. Falaleev, A.N.; Eremina, V.A. On the problem of the state anti-crisis policy instruments in Russia refinement. Sib. Aerosp. J. 2009, 10, 145–148.
  27. Odinokaya, M.; Rubtsova, A.; Eremin, Y.; et al. Technologies for innovative potential development of university students majoring in engineering. In International Conference on Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 270–296.
  28. Iroda, I. Issues of Improving Socio-Cultural Competence of Students in Foreign Language Lessons. Orient. J. Philol. 2022, 2, 81–93.
  29. Safina, M.S. Formation of Socio-cultural Competence in Foreign Language Teaching. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 136, 80–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.292
  30. Askarova, D. Formation of creativity and bookreaders qualities in higher education institution. Sci. Innov. 2022, 1, 1039–1044.
  31. Khakimova, M.; Jakhongir, S.; Fayzullayeva, N.; et al. Neuroscientific Discoveries and Their Implications for Early Childhood Language Education. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2025, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8446 doi:10.30564/fls.v7i3.8446
  32. Oltiboy, B.; Mansur, U.; Utkirjon, S.; et al. Optimizing Linguistic Outcomes in Education: A CRM-Based Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2025, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9383
  33. Oltiboy, B.; Mansur, U.; Utkirjon, S.; et al. Enhancing Linguistic Competency in Indonesia through Strategic Collaboration. Forum Linguist. Stud. 2025, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9381