Development of a Novel Software Interface for Tracking Student Behavior, Performance and Attendance

Digital Technologies Research and Applications

Article

Development of a Novel Software Interface for Tracking Student Behavior, Performance and Attendance

Todd, C., & Secco, E. L. (2025). Development of a Novel Software Interface for Tracking Student Behavior, Performance and Attendance. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 4(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i3.1574

Authors

  • Charlie Todd

    School of Computer Science and the Environment, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK
  • Emanuele Lindo Secco

    School of Computer Science and the Environment, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK

Received: 2 September 2025; Revised: 18 October 2025; Accepted: 22 October 2025; Published: 25 November 2025

This paper presents a novel software interface for tracking student behavior, performance and attendance, exploring how software is used in education and analyzing the benefits and challenges that can come with its use. Technology has become increasingly important to education over recent years, making it a major focus within both technology and education. In this context, the paper presents the implementation of a website, designed to convey how technology can streamline access to information, making it faster and more efficient than the usual paper-based methods used to track attendance, behavior and grades of students. Leveraging on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Constructivist Learning Theory (CLT), a Client-Application Server and Database have been integrated into a novel framework where different users (i.e., student, parent, teacher, admin) can query the database. Role-based access is controlled through users’ tables which contain the user ID, name, email, and password. The relationships between the tables are enforced using foreign keys to maintain data integrity. The proposed system’s design prioritizes accessibility, enhancing the learning capability with a user-friendly interface. The system’s performance has been successfully tested in terms of time response, speed, efficiency and clarity. Initial single-user testing showed a load time of 18 ms for the student login page, with further validation needed for multi-user scenarios.

Keywords:

Education Software Education Management System Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) User Interface (UI) Graphical User Interface (GUI) Human‑Centered Design (HCD) Software Prototype

References

  1. Budiarto, M.; Audiah, S.; Astuti, E.D.; et al. Enhancing School and College Attendance Using Advanced Technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT), Tangerang, Indonesia, 7–8 August 2024; pp. 1–6.
  2. Vain, C. Strategies for Digital Safety and Cybersecurity in Schools. Available online: https://cpdonline.co.uk/knowledge-base/safeguarding/strategies-digital-safety-cybersecurity-schools (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  3. Marston, D.; Fuchs, L.S.; Deno, S.L. Measuring Pupil Progress: A Comparison of Standardized Achievement Tests and Curriculum-Related Measures. Diagnostique 1986, 11, 77–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073724778601100203
  4. Unsworth, R. Teaching through the Cloud: An Ethnography of the Role of Cloud‐Based Collaborative Technologies in the Formation of Teachers’ Classroom Practices. Anthropol. Educ. Q. 2024, 55, 24–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12471
  5. Kotevski, Z. On the Technologies and Systems for Student Attendance Tracking. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 2018, 10, 44–52.
  6. Proctur. The Importance of Student Attendance Tracking Software in Modern Schools. Available online: https://proctur.com/blog/student-attendance-tracking-software/ (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  7. Susilowati, T.; Ihsan Dacholfany, M.; Aminin, S.; et al. Getting Parents Involved in Child’s School: Using Attendance Application System Based on SMS Gateway. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 167–174.
  8. Beaudin, K. College and University Data Breaches: Regulating Higher Education Cybersecurity under State and Federal Law. J. Coll. & Univ. L. 2015, 41, 657.
  9. Friend, M. Importance of ICT in Schools & Benefits for Education. Available online: https://www.classroom365.co.uk/ict-in-schools/ (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  10. Potashnik, M.; Adkins, D. Cost Analysis of Information Technology Projects in Education: Experiences from Developing Countries; Education Section, Human Development Department, World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  11. Flannery, N. The Effectiveness of Attendance-Based Rewards at an Alternative High School. Eiu. Edu. 2022, 1, 1–53.
  12. Lorenzen, S.; Hjuler, N.; Alstrup, S. Tracking Behavioral Patterns Among Students in an Online Educational System. arXiv preprint 2019, arXiv:1908.08937.
  13. Center for Democracy & Technology. Students and Teachers Warn That Schools’ Use of Monitoring Software Is Harming Students. Available online: https://cdt.org/press/students-and-teachers-warn-that-schools-use-of-monitoring-software-is-harming-students/ (accessed on 3 August 2022).
  14. Thompson, P. Technology Acceptance Model. Available online: https://open.library.okstate.edu/foundationsofeducationaltechnology/chapter/2-technology-acceptance-model/ (accessed on 15 August 2019).
  15. Kurt, S. Constructivist Learning Theory. Available online: https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning-theory/ (accessed on 21 February 2021).
  16. GeeksforGeeks. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Available online: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc/ (accessed on 26 February 2020).
  17. Ormazabal, M.; Secco, E.L. A Low-Cost EMG Graphical User Interface Controller for Robotic Hand. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; 2, pp. 459–475.
  18. Baines, C.; Secco, E.L. Design of a Set of Interfaces to Estimate Whether Computer Games Improve User’s Skills and Abilities. Acta Sci. Comput. Sci. 2022, 4, 22–29.
  19. Bell, D.; Secco, E.L. Design of a 3D-Printed Accessible and Affordable Robotic Arm and a User-Friendly Graphical User Interface. In Fourth Congress on Intelligent Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; 1, pp. 195–205.
  20. Secco, E.L.; McHugh, D.D.; Buckley, N. A CNN-Based Computer Vision Interface for Prosthetics’ Application. In Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 41–59.
  21. Yabaku, M.; Ouhbi, S. University Students' Perception and Expectations of Generative AI Tools for Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Würzburg, Germany, 29 July 2024–1 August 2024; pp. 1–5.
  22. Pouyioutas, P.; Zantides, E.; Poveda, M.; et al. Redesigning the User Interface of the InterLearning Software - Graphic Design Meets Computer Science. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06), London, UK, 5–7 July 2006; 811–816.
  23. Cardell-Oliver, R.; Zhang, L.; Barady, R.; et al. Automated Feedback for Quality Assurance in Software Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the 21st Australian Software Engineering Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 6–9 April 2010; pp. 157–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2010.24